Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
How to properly link to products from category pages?
- 
					
					
					
					
 Hi All, We have an e-commerce website and the category pages are built so that there is a product image and below it there is the title. Both the image and the title are in a href (each on its own). I encountered the following unfinished discussion here at MOZ: 
 http://www.seomoz.org/q/how-to-optimize-achor-text-links-on-ecommerce-category-page#post-93758The discussion states that its improper. The question is - if it is wrong then why? (maybe because Google will give its weight to the image anchor instead of the text anchor since it is higher in the page). The other question is how to resolve the matter? 
 Should I add nofollow to the image href?Thanks 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Dear Everett, Can you supply the link to the article? Thanks 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Also see this page for more information on using named anchor links (i.e. page.html#image) to avoid the "first link counts" issue. This is what Alan Mosley is recommending. I think it is much safer than using CSS to try and "trick" search engines. You can put the image on product pages in a named anchor like #image. Resources: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/results-of-google-experimentation-only-the-first-anchor-text-counts http://www.seomoz.org/ugc/3-ways-to-avoid-the-first-link-counts-rule http://www.seomoz.org/blog/the-first-link-counts-rule-and-the-hash-sign 
- 
					
					
					
					
 No problem, glad I could help! 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Works amazing!!!!! Thanks a lot for all of your help. 
- 
					
					
					
					
 I would do something like this: http://jsfiddle.net/D7vMG/3/ (do you see the z-indexes? it makes sure the anchor is higher positioned then the paragraph.) You can of course use only the <a>-tag and not a heading. In that case you can put the position: absolute on the a-tag.</a> <a>Hope it helps! Good luck!</a> 
- 
					
					
					
					
 THANKS!!! I've been working on it since your first reply  Last question (I'm a bit rude now) - I also have price beneath "The New Ipad" anchor. Currently it is not in the href and I'm thinking of keeping it this way (which would mean it will be in the H3 but not in the href). Also, the href's are simple href's not surrounded by h3's, What do you think? Changing them? (keeping the price outside the href but inside the H3) It seems correct but changing would mean of a lot of anchors will be changed on the entire website... scarry 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Yeah of course, you can style the link any way you want. Even hide it  although I wouldn't recommend that hehe. although I wouldn't recommend that hehe.I made this jsfiddle for you: http://jsfiddle.net/D7vMG/1/ good luck trying it yourself! 
- 
					
					
					
					
 It is pretty much as if the anchor flows over the entire image. I did this a while back on a dutch telecom website called typhone dot nl. Check it out, it's on the frontpage (the offer blocks all have it) The H3 is just there as an example. If I just got an H1 above all products, i use h2's, if there is a h2, i use h3's. and so on. 
- 
					
					
					
					
 That's what the css code above does, it puts the link beneath the image visually when users look at the site, while keeping the link above the image in the actual code. 
- 
					
					
					
					
 I should not of said 2 pages, but it has been shown that both links will give link text relevancy. The javascript link will be followed, it will not help 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Is there a way to do so and having the link appearing beneath the image? I don't want to change the design 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Dear Alan, If Google will see it as two pages I'm guessing I will need to add a canonical to the # version. Is that the case? What about having the image with a javascript link? (location.href) or is that suspicious? 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Dont use no-follow, you will just leak link juice. One way around this, is to use a anchor # in your url for the image. like page.html#someterm This will in fact give you link text relevancy for both, google will see this as 2 different pages. Make sure you have alt text for the image. This tataic and well as what x-com may in the future be seen as over optimization, so it may be tter to do somthing like this Your link textYou can just link the whole lot in the one link. Or move your text to above the image. 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Thank you for the answer. I'm not too strong with css besides for the basics, what you mean is that the anchor will be displayed beneath the image for the user even though the code is placed before the image and also that clicking on the image will actually be like clicking on the anchor since its size includes the image??? Brilliant, it will also give more "engagement credit" to the anchor instead of splitting it (actually ppl usually clicking on the image). By the way, do you put all of your products on the page as H3? Thanks 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Hi Noamflint, we develop a lot of e-commerce websites and I want to fill you in how we tackled this problem several months ago and how. We deleted the anchor of the image! In our code it looks something like: The New iPadAs you see at the moment there is no anchor on the image, but our clients do want this. because of usabilty. and people just love clicking images. We solved this with CSS: div { position: relative; padding-top: 30px; display: block; } div h3 { position: absolute; top: 0px; left: 0px; display: block; } div h3 a { width: 200px; height: 230px; display: block; } div img { width: 200px; height: 200px; display: block; } This code above is pseudo of course, but i hope you see what we are trying to accomplish. The anchor tag is positioned absolute in the parent div. With the dimensions on it, the link is above the image, so when people hover the image. they automatically hover the link. Clicking in it, takes them to the detail page. You should try it! Maybe it will help you out. 
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
- 
		
		Moz ToolsChat with the community about the Moz tools. 
- 
		
		SEO TacticsDiscuss the SEO process with fellow marketers 
- 
		
		CommunityDiscuss industry events, jobs, and news! 
- 
		
		Digital MarketingChat about tactics outside of SEO 
- 
		
		Research & TrendsDive into research and trends in the search industry. 
- 
		
		SupportConnect on product support and feature requests. 
Related Questions
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Would You Redirect a Page if the Parent Page was Redirected?
 Hi everyone! Let's use this as an example URL: https://www.example.com/marvel/avengers/hulk/ We have done a 301 redirect for the "Avengers" page to another page on the site. Sibling pages of the "Hulk" page live off "marvel" now (ex: /marvel/thor/ and /marvel/iron-man/). Is there any benefit in doing a 301 for the "Hulk" page to live at /marvel/hulk/ like it's sibling pages? Is there any harm long-term in leaving the "Hulk" page under a permanently redirected page? Thank you! Matt Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | amag0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Is it bad for SEO to have a page that is not linked to anywhere on your site?
 Hi, We had a content manager request to delete a page from our site. Looking at the traffic to the page, I noticed there were a lot of inbound links from credible sites. Rather than deleting the page, we simply removed it from the navigation, so that a user could still access the page by clicking on a link to it from an external site. Questions: Is it bad for SEO to have a page that is not directly accessible from your site? If no: do we keep this page in our Sitemap, or remove it? If yes: what is a better strategy to ensure the inbound links aren't considered "broken links" and also to minimize any negative impact to our SEO? Should we delete the page and 301 redirect users to the parent page for the page we had previously hidden? Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | jnew9290
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Pages with excessive number of links
 Hi all, I work for a retailer and I've crawled our website with RankTracker for optimization suggestions. The main suggestion is "Pages with excessive number of links: 4178" The page with the largest amount of links has 634 links (627 internal, 7 external), the lowest 382 links (375 internal, 7 external). However, when I view the source on any one of the example pages, it becomes obvious that the site's main navigation header contains 358 links, so every new page starts with 358 links before any content. Our rivals and much larger sites like argos.co.uk appear to have just as many links in their main navigation menu. So my questions are: 1. Will these excessive links really be causing us a problem or is it just 'good practice' to have fewer links Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Bee159
 2. Can I use 'no follow' to stop Google etc from counting the 358 main navigation links
 3. Is have 4000+ pages of your website all dumbly pointing to other pages a help or hindrance?
 4. Can we 'minify' this code so it's cached on first load and therefore loads faster? Thank you.0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Should my back links go to home page or internal pages
 Right now we rank on page 2 for many KWs, so should i now focus my attention on getting links to my home page to build domain authority or continue to direct links to the internal pages for specific KWs? I am about to write some articles for several good ranking sites and want to know whether to link my company name (same as domain name) or KW to the home page or use individual KWs to the internal pages - I am only allowed one link per article to my site. Thanks Ash Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | AshShep10
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Effect of Removing Footer Links In all Pages Except Home Page
 Dear MOZ Community: In an effort to improve the user interface of our business website (a New York CIty commercial real estate agency) my designer eliminated a standardized footer containing links to about 20 pages. The new design maintains this footer on the home page, but all other pages (about 600 eliminate the footer). The new design does a very good job eliminating non essential items. Most of the changes remove or reduce the size of unnecessary design elements. The footer removal is the only change really effect the link structure. The new design is not launched yet. Hoping to receive some good advice from the MOZ community before proceeding My concern is that removing these links could have an adverse or unpredictable effect on ranking. Last Summer we launched a completely redesigned version of the site and our ranking collapsed for 3 months. However unlike the previous upgrade this modifications does not URL names, tags, text or any major element. Only major change is the footer removal. Some of the footer pages provide good (not critical) info for visitors. Note the footer will still appear on the home page but will be removed on the interior pages. Are we risking any detrimental ranking effect by removing this footer? Can we compensate by adding text links to these pages if the links from the footer are removed? Seems irregular to have a home page footer but no footer on the other pages. Are we inviting any downgrade, penalty, adverse SEO effect by implementing this? I very much like the new design but do not want to risk a fall in rank and traffic. Thanks for your input!!! Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Kingalan1
 Alan0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Do 404 Pages from Broken Links Still Pass Link Equity?
 Hi everyone, I've searched the Q&A section, and also Google, for about the past hour and couldn't find a clear answer on this. When inbound links point to a page that no longer exists, thus producing a 404 Error Page, is link equity/domain authority lost? We are migrating a large eCommerce website and have hundreds of pages with little to no traffic that have legacy 301 redirects pointing to their URLs. I'm trying to decide how necessary it is to keep these redirects. I'm not concerned about the page authority of the pages with little traffic...I'm concerned about overall domain authority of the site since that certainly plays a role in how the site ranks overall in Google (especially pages with no links pointing to them...perfect example is Amazon...thousands of pages with no external links that rank #1 in Google for their product name). Anyone have a clear answer? Thanks! Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | M_D_Golden_Peak0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Dynamic pages - ecommerce product pages
 Hi guys, Before I dive into my question, let me give you some background.. I manage an ecommerce site and we're got thousands of product pages. The pages contain dynamic blocks and information in these blocks are fed by another system. So in a nutshell, our product team enters the data in a software and boom, the information is generated in these page blocks. But that's not all, these pages then redirect to a duplicate version with a custom URL. This is cached and this is what the end user sees. This was done to speed up load, rather than the system generate a dynamic page on the fly, the cache page is loaded and the user sees it super fast. Another benefit happened as well, after going live with the cached pages, they started getting indexed and ranking in Google. The problem is that, the redirect to the duplicate cached page isn't a permanent one, it's a meta refresh, a 302 that happens in a second. So yeah, I've got 302s kicking about. The development team can set up 301 but then there won't be any caching, pages will just load dynamically. Google records pages that are cached but does it cache a dynamic page though? Without a cached page, I'm wondering if I would drop in traffic. The view source might just show a list of dynamic blocks, no content! How would you tackle this? I've already setup canonical tags on the cached pages but removing cache.. Thanks Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Bio-RadAbs0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Duplicate internal links on page, any benefit to nofollow
 Link spam is naturally a hot topic amongst SEO's, particularly post Penguin. While digging around forums etc, I watched a video blog from Matt Cutts posted a while ago that suggests that Google only pays attention to the first instance of a link on the page As most websites will have multiple instances of a links (header, footer and body text), is it beneficial to nofollow the additional instances of the link? Also as the first instance of a link will in most cases be within the header nav, does that then make the content link text critical or can good on page optimisation be pulled from the title attribute? I would appreciate the experiences and thoughts Mozzers thoughts on this thanks in advance! Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | JustinTaylor880
 
			
		 
			
		 
			
		 
			
		 
			
		 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				