• majorAlexa

        See all notifications

        Skip to content
        Moz logo Menu open Menu close
        • Products
          • Moz Pro
          • Moz Pro Home
          • Moz Local
          • Moz Local Home
          • STAT
          • Moz API
          • Moz API Home
          • Compare SEO Products
          • Moz Data
        • Free SEO Tools
          • Domain Analysis
          • Keyword Explorer
          • Link Explorer
          • Competitive Research
          • MozBar
          • More Free SEO Tools
        • Learn SEO
          • Beginner's Guide to SEO
          • SEO Learning Center
          • Moz Academy
          • MozCon
          • Webinars, Whitepapers, & Guides
        • Blog
        • Why Moz
          • Digital Marketers
          • Agency Solutions
          • Enterprise Solutions
          • Small Business Solutions
          • The Moz Story
          • New Releases
        • Log in
        • Log out
        • Products
          • Moz Pro

            Your all-in-one suite of SEO essentials.

          • Moz Local

            Raise your local SEO visibility with complete local SEO management.

          • STAT

            SERP tracking and analytics for enterprise SEO experts.

          • Moz API

            Power your SEO with our index of over 44 trillion links.

          • Compare SEO Products

            See which Moz SEO solution best meets your business needs.

          • Moz Data

            Power your SEO strategy & AI models with custom data solutions.

          Let your business shine with Listings AI
          Moz Local

          Let your business shine with Listings AI

          Learn more
        • Free SEO Tools
          • Domain Analysis

            Get top competitive SEO metrics like DA, top pages and more.

          • Keyword Explorer

            Find traffic-driving keywords with our 1.25 billion+ keyword index.

          • Link Explorer

            Explore over 40 trillion links for powerful backlink data.

          • Competitive Research

            Uncover valuable insights on your organic search competitors.

          • MozBar

            See top SEO metrics for free as you browse the web.

          • More Free SEO Tools

            Explore all the free SEO tools Moz has to offer.

          NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic
          Moz Pro

          NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic

          Learn more
        • Learn SEO
          • Beginner's Guide to SEO

            The #1 most popular introduction to SEO, trusted by millions.

          • SEO Learning Center

            Broaden your knowledge with SEO resources for all skill levels.

          • On-Demand Webinars

            Learn modern SEO best practices from industry experts.

          • How-To Guides

            Step-by-step guides to search success from the authority on SEO.

          • Moz Academy

            Upskill and get certified with on-demand courses & certifications.

          • MozCon

            Save on Early Bird tickets and join us in London or New York City

          Unlock flexible pricing & new endpoints
          Moz API

          Unlock flexible pricing & new endpoints

          Find your plan
        • Blog
        • Why Moz
          • Digital Marketers

            Simplify SEO tasks to save time and grow your traffic.

          • Small Business Solutions

            Uncover insights to make smarter marketing decisions in less time.

          • Agency Solutions

            Earn & keep valuable clients with unparalleled data & insights.

          • Enterprise Solutions

            Gain a competitive edge in the ever-changing world of search.

          • The Moz Story

            Moz was the first & remains the most trusted SEO company.

          • New Releases

            Get the scoop on the latest and greatest from Moz.

          Surface actionable competitive intel
          New Feature

          Surface actionable competitive intel

          Learn More
        • Log in
          • Moz Pro
          • Moz Local
          • Moz Local Dashboard
          • Moz API
          • Moz API Dashboard
          • Moz Academy
        • Avatar
          • Moz Home
          • Notifications
          • Account & Billing
          • Manage Users
          • Community Profile
          • My Q&A
          • My Videos
          • Log Out

        The Moz Q&A Forum

        • Forum
        • Questions
        • My Q&A
        • Users
        • Ask the Community

        Welcome to the Q&A Forum

        Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

        1. Home
        2. SEO Tactics
        3. Intermediate & Advanced SEO
        4. Are pages with a canonical tag indexed?

        Moz Q&A is closed.

        After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.

        Are pages with a canonical tag indexed?

        Intermediate & Advanced SEO
        3
        17
        17838
        Loading More Posts
        • Watching

          Notify me of new replies.
          Show question in unread.

        • Not Watching

          Do not notify me of new replies.
          Show question in unread if category is not ignored.

        • Ignoring

          Do not notify me of new replies.
          Do not show question in unread.

        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes
        Reply
        • Reply as question
        Locked
        This topic has been deleted. Only users with question management privileges can see it.
        • fablau
          fablau last edited by

          Hello here,

          here are my questions for you related to the canonical tag:

          1. If I put online a new webpage with a canonical tag pointing to a different page, will this new page be indexed by Google and will I be able to find it in the index?

          2. If instead I apply the canonical tag to a page already in the index, will this page be removed from the index?

          Thank you in advance for any insights!

          Fabrizio

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • fablau
            fablau @mememax last edited by

            Yes, I will look into doing that on GWT.

            Was a nice and useful chat indeed! Thank you again.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • mememax
              mememax @fablau last edited by

              Sorry Fabrizio I got mad with my old answer 🙂

              that canonical doesn't make sense with a noindex, with noindex follow.you're completely fine.

              Summing up I think that you have many parameters so you should try to write them down and define the role of each one.

              Then add them in GWT and choose there which are the ones which doesn't add any value and which you want to "block" (instead of putting a noindex).

              The valuable ones (the one which adds value and changes content) should contain the self canonical and paginated next/prev. If you can get rid of unesful parameters it could be better so to have cleaner and shorter urls.

              Just be sure that you're mainly using the most important parameters so you're consistent with your strategy.

              Hope this will clear your doubts, it was a nice chat! 🙂

              fablau 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • fablau
                fablau @Dr-Pete last edited by

                Yes, actually I could get rid of the lpg parameter (it wasn't really needed!), so now the tag definitions are (for the 3rd page of the Guitar index):

                <LINK rel="<a class="attribute-value">next</a>" href="[http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=4](view-source:http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=4)"> <LINK rel="<a class="attribute-value">prev</a>" href="[http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=2](view-source:http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=2)"> <LINK rel="<a class="attribute-value">canonical</a>" href="[http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=3](view-source:http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=3)">
                

                Now, the only doubt I still have is to add or not add the noindex tag to the page when it is requested to be displayed in a different way (such as the "table view" or a different item display order). In my opinion, if I stick with the canonical tag I don't need a noindex directive. What do you think?

                mememax 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Dr-Pete
                  Dr-Pete Staff @mememax last edited by

                  Yeah, to be fair, I'm not clear on what all of the additional parameters (like "lpg=") do, so this can get tricky fast. Basically, look at it this way:

                  If the URL is:
                  example.com/page=3?param=x

                  Then the tags should point to:

                  Rel=prev:
                  example.com/page=2?param=x

                  Rel=next:
                  example.com/page=4?param=x

                  Rel=canonical:
                  example.com/page=3 (no parameters)

                  Some parameters may not be indexed and/or functional, though, so individual cases can vary. You may choose to ignore some parameters in Google Webmaster Tools, for example. It gets tricky as the parameter list grows.

                  fablau 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • fablau
                    fablau @mememax last edited by

                    Mememax, after thinking I have some doubts though about what you have suggested.

                    Why I want to put a noindex tag to the page displaying the list in "table view" if I already have a canonical tag pointing to the "regular view" page? Wouldn't the canonical tag be enough for the purpose of telling that the "real" canonical page is the "regular view" version? I am asking this because if I want to apply a noindex tag to that kind of different view, I may want to do the same to the list displayed with a different order, and for any other different way of displaying the list, etc... hence just using the canonical tag would be appropriate, pointing always to the "regular list" view, no matter what kind of "filtering" or "different view' option is selected. What do you think?

                    In other words, I don't think I need to include a noindex tag for any different kind of view the user requests as long as I provide a canonical tag pointing to the regular view list.

                    Am I correct?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • fablau
                      fablau @mememax last edited by

                      Yes, thank you Mememax, I agree with you 100%. That makes perfect sense and I will work on that tomorrow morning. I am eager to know Dr. Peter thoughts and confirmation.

                      On my side, I think I got it cleared-up now. Thank you very much again!

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • fablau
                        fablau @Dr-Pete last edited by

                        Thank you ! That makes sense now.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • mememax
                          mememax @fablau last edited by

                          Hey Fabrizio, I think that what Google states in their guidelines is that you have two choices:

                          • if you have a view all page, you should noindex and follow all your other pages so google will deliver only that page
                          • if you don't have a view all page or if you prefer to show paginated series (i.e. to make pages lighter and quicker to deliver to users) you may consider to use rel next/prev.

                          In this second case it may happen that you also add filters or session ids in the urls of those pages, in that case you should consider adding a self referentail canonical tag to avoid duplicates. But this is only if you cover this case, if you're looking to canonicalize correctly your paginated series you may not use the self canonical tag, because if not properly implemented this may get you a bit of extra work.

                          In this page for example

                          I found this:

                          http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=3&lpg=0">

                          Which  I don't think is what you want to do.

                          Also if you set the page to view as a table: your url changes to http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=3&viewlistflag=1

                          and while the canonical should remain the same (well done but I think you should get rid of the lpg parameter in the canonical), the rel next prev should change accordingly IMO.

                          So instead of being:

                          prev: http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=2&lpg=20
                          next: http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=4&lpg=60

                          you should offer the next and prev page of the filtered url:

                          next: http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=4&lpg=60&viewlistflag=1
                          prev: http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=2&lpg=20&viewlistflag=1

                          Or in this case (since the content is almost the same you may consider the list page as the canonical of the table one putting there a noindex.

                          Summing up, IMO: in this page http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=3

                          you'll have:

                          prev: http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=4&lpg=60
                          next: http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=2&lpg=20
                          (optional) a self canonical to http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=3

                          In this page (and in other filtered pages if you have apply the same idea):
                          http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=3&viewlistflag=1

                          You'll have:

                          noindex,follow and canonical to the list page:
                          http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=3

                          maybe dr peter can correct me if I'm wrong but I think this should be more consistent like this. Sorry for the huge answer

                          fablau Dr-Pete 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • Dr-Pete
                            Dr-Pete Staff @fablau last edited by

                            Wow, yes - sorry about that. I've updated it. Google original write-up actually covers this case, too (it's toward the end):

                            http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2011/09/pagination-with-relnext-and-relprev.html

                            fablau 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • fablau
                              fablau @Dr-Pete last edited by

                              Please, have a look at the page below, I have modified the canonical tag as suggested:

                              http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=3&lpg=40

                              Is that correct?

                              Thank you again very much.

                              mememax 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • fablau
                                fablau @Dr-Pete last edited by

                                Thank you Peter, I guess you meant to have the "canonical" tag as last tag in your example above, and also the previous rel=next and rel=prev definitions should be inverted:

                                Am I correct? That makes sense. If so, I will update my site to reflect this.

                                Thank you for the link!

                                Dr-Pete 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • Dr-Pete
                                  Dr-Pete Staff @fablau last edited by

                                  This gets tricky fast. Google currently wants rel=prev/next to contain the parameters currently in use (like sorts) for the page you're on and then wants you rel-canonical to the non-parameterized version. So, if the URL is:

                                  http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=3&lpg=40

                                  ...then the tags should be...

                                  Yeah, it's a bit strange. They have suggested that it's ok to rel-canonical to a "View All" page, but with the kind of product volume you have, that's generally a bad idea (for users and search). The have specifically recommended against setting rel-canonical to Page 1 of search results, especially if you use rel=prev/next.

                                  Rel=prev/next will still show pages in the index, but I've found it to work pretty well. The other option is the more classic approach to simple META NOINDEX, FOLLOW pages 2+. That can still be effective, but it's getting less common.

                                  Adam Audette has generally strong posts about this topic - here's a good, recent one:

                                  http://searchengineland.com/the-latest-greatest-on-seo-pagination-114284

                                  fablau 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • fablau
                                    fablau @Dr-Pete last edited by

                                    Thank you for your post, and I think you have just opened a doubt I had, and that's exactly what also concerned me.

                                    Have a look at this typical category page of ours:

                                    http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html

                                    For that category pagination, I have implemented the rel=prev/next as suggested by Google, but being afraid to be penalized for duplicate content, I also put a canonical tag pointing at the first page of that index. Should I have put the canonical tag pointing to the page series itself?

                                    Something like:

                                    http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=2

                                    
                                    for the second page instead of the general:
                                    
                                    

                                    http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html

                                    as I am currently doing?

                                    Thanks!

                                    Dr-Pete 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • Dr-Pete
                                      Dr-Pete Staff last edited by

                                      I have to disagree on this one. If Google honors a canonical tag, the non-canonical page will generally disappear from the index, at least inasmuch as we can measure it (with "site:", getting it to rank, etc.). It's a strong signal in many cases.

                                      This is part of the reason Google introduced rel=prev/next for paginated content. With canonical, pages in the series aren't usually able to rank. Rel=prev/next allows them to rank without clogging up the index (theoretically). For search pagination, it's generally a better solution.

                                      If your paginated content is still showing in large quantities in the index, Google may not be honoring the canonical tag properly, and they could be causing duplicate content issues. It depends on the implementation, but they recommend these days that you don't canonical to the first page of search results. Google may choose to ignore the tag in some cases.

                                      fablau 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                                      • fablau
                                        fablau @mememax last edited by

                                        Thank you very much, that makes perfect sense. In my case, I am talking exactly about paginated content, and that's probably why all pages are in the index despite they are canonicalized to point to the main page. So, I guess that even if you have thousands of paginated pages indexed (mine is a pretty big e-commerce website), that's not going to be an issue. Am I right?

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • mememax
                                          mememax last edited by

                                          Normally the only thing which will prevent a page from ranking is noindex tag. If you don't want to have it indexed just noindex it, if that page has been laready indexed, put the noindex tag and delete from index using GWT option.

                                          Concerning the canonical tag thing, it will consolidate the seo value in one page but it won't prevent those page to appear in rankings, however you may have two cases:

                                          1. the two or more pages are identical. In that case google may accept the canonicalization and show always the original page.
                                          2. the two or more pages are slightly different, it's the case of paginated pages which are canonicalized using rel next/prev. In that sense the whole value will be consolidated in page 1 but then the page which will be shown in the rankings will be the one which responds to that query, for example if someone is looking for blue glass, google will return the page which shows blue glass listing if that's different from the first one.

                                          Hope this may help you!

                                          fablau 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                                          • 1 / 1
                                          • First post
                                            Last post

                                          Browse Questions

                                          Explore more categories

                                          • Moz Tools

                                            Chat with the community about the Moz tools.

                                          • SEO Tactics

                                            Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers

                                          • Community

                                            Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!

                                          • Digital Marketing

                                            Chat about tactics outside of SEO

                                          • Research & Trends

                                            Dive into research and trends in the search industry.

                                          • Support

                                            Connect on product support and feature requests.

                                          • See all categories

                                          Related Questions

                                          • Chris_Mc

                                            Home Page Title - Google Overriding my Title Tag

                                            title tags

                                            Hi, We have noticed our home page title tag has now been replaced by our brand name (by Google I'm assuming). We have also noted that the page is dropping off SERPS for our main keywords, I suspect they are related but ofc I cant be sure. I know the recent Google update has impacted titles but I wasn't sure if it would apply here. Has anyone any advice on this and/or having the same issue? We normally rank well for grass seed (UK search) https://thegrasspeople.com/ I also noticed some strange mark up in our source code which seems to have been left behind by Sketch - we are getting this removed. <title>Combined Shape</title> <desc>Created with Sketch.</desc> Chris

                                            Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Chris_Mc
                                            0
                                          • Jes-Extender-Australia

                                            Htaccess - Redirecting TAG or Category pages

                                            Hello Fellow Moz's, We have an issue redirecting some /TAG and /Category pages to inner pages. As an example we use: RedirectMatch 301 /category/Sample-Category(.*) https://OurDomain.com.au/New-Page//$1 That works well. The issue is we have other categories and tags that are named similar to /Sample-Category As an example, if we try to redirect /Sample-Category-1 to /New-Page-1 - it will not work, and redirects to /New-Page I assume this is because /Sample-Category is already being redirected, so anything after /Sample-Category like -1 or -2 or -3 etc, will not be recognized. Anyone know of a workaround?

                                            Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Jes-Extender-Australia
                                            0
                                          • Kingalan1

                                            Best Practices for Title Tags for Product Listing Page

                                            My industry is commercial real estate in New York City. Our site has 300 real estate listings. The format we have been using for Title Tags are below. This probably disastrous from an SEO perspective. Using number is a total waste space. A few questions:
                                            -Should we set listing not no index if they are not content rich?
                                            -If we do choose to index them, should we avoid titles listing Square Footage and dollar amounts?
                                            -Since local SEO is critical, should the titles always list New York, NY or Manhattan, NY?
                                            -I have red that titles should contain some form of branding. But our company name is Metro Manhattan Office Space. That would take up way too much space. Even "Metro Manhattan" is long. DO we need to use the title tag for branding or can we just focus on a brief description of page content incorporating one important phrase? Our site is: w w w . m e t r o - m a n h a t t a n . c o m <colgroup><col width="405"></colgroup>
                                            | Turnkey Flatiron Tech Space | 2,850 SF $10,687/month | <colgroup><col width="405"></colgroup>
                                            | Gallery, Office Rental | Midtown, W. 57 St | 4441SF $24055/month | <colgroup><col width="405"></colgroup>
                                            | Open Plan Loft |Flatiron, Chelsea | 2414SF $12,874/month | <colgroup><col width="405"></colgroup>
                                            | Tribeca Corner Loft | Varick Street | 2267SF $11,712/month | <colgroup><col width="405"></colgroup>
                                            | 275 Madison, LAW, P7, 3,252SF, $65 - Manhattan, New York |

                                            Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Kingalan1
                                            0
                                          • ostesmorbrod

                                            Landing pages for paid traffic and the use of noindex vs canonical

                                            A client of mine has a lot of differentiated landing pages with only a few changes on each, but with the same intent and goal as the generic version. The generic version of the landing page  is included in navigation, sitemap and is indexed on Google. The purpose of the differentiated landing pages is to include the city and some minor changes in the text/imagery to best fit the Adwords text. Other than that, the intent and purpose of the pages are the same as the main / generic page. They are not to be indexed, nor am I trying to have hidden pages linking to the generic and indexed one (I'm not going the blackhat way). So – I want to avoid that the duplicate landing pages are being indexed (obviously), but I'm not sure if I should use noindex (nofollow as well?) or rel=canonical, since these landing pages are localized campaign versions of the generic page with more or less only paid traffic to them. I don't want to be accidentally penalized, but I still need the generic / main page to rank as high as possible... What would be your recommendation on this issue?

                                            Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ostesmorbrod
                                            0
                                          • odihost

                                            Google does not want to index my page

                                            I have a site that is hundreds of page indexed on Google. But there is a page that I put in the footer section that Google seems does not like and are not indexing that page. I've tried submitting it to their index through google webmaster and it will appear on Google index but then after a few days it's gone again. Before that page had canonical meta to another page, but it is removed now.

                                            Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | odihost
                                            0
                                          • Blink-SEO

                                            Do internal links from non-indexed pages matter?

                                            Hi everybody! Here's my question. After a site migration, a client has seen a big drop in rankings. We're trying to narrow down the issue. It seems that they have lost around 15,000 links following the switch, but these came from pages that were blocked in the robots.txt file. I was wondering if there was any research that has been done on the impact of internal links from no-indexed pages. Would be great to hear your thoughts! Sam

                                            Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Blink-SEO
                                            0
                                          • SeoMartin1

                                            Whats the best way to remove search indexed pages on magento?

                                            A new client ( aqmp.com.br/ )call me yestarday and she told me since they moved on magento they droped down more than US$ 20.000 in sales revenue ( monthly)... I´ve just checked the webmaster tool and I´ve just discovered the number of crawled pages went from 3.260 to 75.000 since magento started... magento is creating lots of pages with queries like search and filters. Example: http://aqmp.com.br/acessorios/lencos.html http://aqmp.com.br/acessorios/lencos.html?mode=grid http://aqmp.com.br/acessorios/lencos.html?dir=desc&order=name Add a instruction on robots.txt is the best way to remove unnecessary pages of the search engine?

                                            Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SeoMartin1
                                            0
                                          • askotzko

                                            Does rel=canonical fix duplicate page titles?

                                            I implemented rel=canonical on our pages which helped a lot, but my latest Moz crawl is still showing lots of duplicate page titles (2,000+). There are other ways to get to this page (depending on what feature you clicked, it will have a different URL) but will have the same page title. Does having rel=canonical in place fix the duplicate page title problem, or do I need to change something else? I was under the impression that the canonical tag would address this by telling the crawler which URL was the URL and the crawler would only use that one for the page title.

                                            Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | askotzko
                                            0

                                          Get started with Moz Pro!

                                          Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

                                          Start my free trial
                                          Products
                                          • Moz Pro
                                          • Moz Local
                                          • Moz API
                                          • Moz Data
                                          • STAT
                                          • Product Updates
                                          Moz Solutions
                                          • SMB Solutions
                                          • Agency Solutions
                                          • Enterprise Solutions
                                          • Digital Marketers
                                          Free SEO Tools
                                          • Domain Authority Checker
                                          • Link Explorer
                                          • Keyword Explorer
                                          • Competitive Research
                                          • Brand Authority Checker
                                          • Local Citation Checker
                                          • MozBar Extension
                                          • MozCast
                                          Resources
                                          • Blog
                                          • SEO Learning Center
                                          • Help Hub
                                          • Beginner's Guide to SEO
                                          • How-to Guides
                                          • Moz Academy
                                          • API Docs
                                          About Moz
                                          • About
                                          • Team
                                          • Careers
                                          • Contact
                                          Why Moz
                                          • Case Studies
                                          • Testimonials
                                          Get Involved
                                          • Become an Affiliate
                                          • MozCon
                                          • Webinars
                                          • Practical Marketer Series
                                          • MozPod
                                          Connect with us

                                          Contact the Help team

                                          Join our newsletter
                                          Moz logo
                                          © 2021 - 2025 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
                                          • Accessibility
                                          • Terms of Use
                                          • Privacy

                                          Looks like your connection to Moz was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.