Noindex : Do Follow or No Follow Tags?

[WebServiceConsulting.com]

Hello,

I have a website with tags (which have the noindex tag) on each article post.

I've been told that I should noindex/nofollow these tag pages, because they are getting link juice passed to them, and since they aren't getting indexed, it's wasting link juice to those pages, when the link juice could be passed to a page that is actually getting indexed.

What are your thoughts on this?

Also, what would be the point to noindex/follow a page, if you are noindexing that page? Isn't it just wasting link juice?

What is the proper SEO way to optimize tags.

[FedeEinhorn]

I think the way you have your tags set is perfect. While having a robots=noindex tag allows google to read the page and pass pagerank, there's no point listing them in search results as they actually don't offer any valuable content; they link to, but they don't have it.

That said, google goes over your tag pages passing pagerank, which ultimately get more juice to your articles. Sometimes, within a post, you can link to a tag page within the content, so users can read more about certain topics and you are passing more juice to that tag page, although not being indexed, that tag page passes pagerank back to the articles.

The noindex has nothing (almost) to do with pagerank, it could be a tremendously useful page (you can even earn links to it from external sources), but they are only valuable to users reading your content and interested in a particular "subject" you mention within the post/context.

[ChristopherGlaeser]

The use of nofollow does not retain link juice (Google made this change years ago).  Each link uses link juice; a follow link passes link juice to the other page and nofollow throws the link juice away.  You should use nofollow for paid links and if you can not vouch for the other page (e.g. spam links in a blog comment).  If you link to a quality site that is not a paid link, then follow is fine.

Best,
Christopher