Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Best Practices for Homepage Title Tag
- 
					
					
					
					
 Hi, I would like to know if there is any update about the best practices for the homepage title tag. I mean, a couple of years ago, it was still working placing main keywords in the homepage title tag. But since the last google SERP update, the number of characters that are being shown were reduced, and now we try to work with 55 and 56 characters. That has reduced our capacity of including many keywords on the title tag. Besides, search engines are smarter now to choose the correct inner page to show in SERP. But I am wondering if the Homepage Title should have a branded orientation or should include main keywords, cause it is still working that strategy. I would appreciatte any update in this issue. Thank you! 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Thanks again! 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Correct - I can give you a trick though. If the SERP is a high value page. Thousands if not millions of dollars has been spent on Adwords A/B testing the Ads that work on that page. When you frame your meta description and Title if you can - take into account the top Ads that companies keep on replaying. They would not keep running them, if not highly successful on that page. Go get them... 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Thank you! 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Thank you Tom! For sure, a ctr optimized title works better. I still don't know if having less kws in title tag pays the worth... I still don't know, what would be better Attractive title, but less keywords. 
 or
 less attractive title and more keywordsSpanish language makes it a little more difficult, cause generally words are longer, and you cannot say too much... Maybe the only way is testing for each case, what works better. 
 I wish it were esier!Thank you! 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Thank you John for your detailed answer! Very interesting insights 
 It seems that there is not easy way and not a general answer to this question.
- 
					
					
					
					
 Interesting responses - we specialize in title tags and descriptions. There is no uniform practice as such. I disagree more with Tom on the above, but he is also right! The suggested method by Alick is I believe still generally the best way forward. That said as Tom pointed out clickability should also be an integral feature in how you form the Title tag and description. So there is a trade off - and difficult often to find the balance SEO -v- Clickability. High traffic pages should have alot of thought and consideration - impacts can be massive. The positive is with the new search traffic data available in WMT's you can try a few options over several weeks. In the new WMT's you can monitor each page more accurately and the effect of Position, Impressions, Clicks and CTR changes. Our experience is that with changes to the Title & Description & the subsequent Clicks on page google re-evaluates "the page relevance to the query" to answer a "searchers query". Google re-sets or re-tests you. Google either then "publishes the page on more or less searches" and google monitors searchers behavior on the page when people click through, for stickiness. A good Title tag will have strong keyword elements and this can be be measured in WMT's as Google places the Result on more "searched pages". Immediately after indexing the page position may drop and likewise CTR. However the clicks go up. Why does this happen? It is because google believes the new result answers more searchers queries. Then the google tests how people respond to the page when they click through - if positive the page position climbs on the new pages - if there is no stickiness (ie they pogostick) it declines. If google believes the new page is answering a "searchers query" then the page ranking generally will slowly increase, and likewise CTR. Anyway maybe got a bit off track. But feel free to ask any questions. ps Yes I know google state CTR is not a ranking factor however they do take stock of what customers do on a page. 
- 
					
					
					
					
 I disagree with the post above. The most important thing for your title tag is to make it compelling enough to click. It's your biggest shop window - you need to use the space. A "Keyword - Keyword | Brand" isn't going to do that. You will, of course, want to include your primary keyword in there, but you tell me which of these you'd prefer to click: "Blue Widgets - Red Widgets | The Widgets Co" "Cheap Blue Widgets - Free USA Shipping! | The Widgets Co" Try and get your key selling points in the title tag as often as your keywords. Give the user a reason to click. In addition, title tags are truncated/shortened based on character width, not the number characters. Dr Pete at Moz put together a great preview tool that you can check your title tags in to make sure they won't be shortened. Hope this helps. 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Hi, Optimal format for any page title tag is **Primary Keyword - Secondary Keyword | Brand Name. ** You can use it same for homepage also. If a brand is well-known enough to make a difference in click-through rates in search results, the brand name should be first. If the brand is less known or relevant than the keyword, the keyword should be first. If you keep your titles under 55 characters, you can expect at least 95% of your titles to display properly Hope this helps. Thanks 
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
- 
		
		Moz ToolsChat with the community about the Moz tools. 
- 
		
		SEO TacticsDiscuss the SEO process with fellow marketers 
- 
		
		CommunityDiscuss industry events, jobs, and news! 
- 
		
		Digital MarketingChat about tactics outside of SEO 
- 
		
		Research & TrendsDive into research and trends in the search industry. 
- 
		
		SupportConnect on product support and feature requests. 
Related Questions
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Why is our noindex tag not working?
 Hi, I have the following page where we've implemented a no index tag. But when we run this page in screaming frog or this tool here to verify the noidex is present and functioning, it shows that it's not. But if you view the source of the page, the code is present in the head tag. And unfortunately we've seen instances where Google is indexing pages we've noindexed. Any thoughts on the example above or why this is happening in Google? Eddy Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | eddys_kap0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Too many Tags and Categories what should I do to clean this up?
 Hello, Everyone! I am trying to do a clean up for one of my client sites. I'm noticing that the Categories and tags are way out of hand. It looks like random tags and categories were just added because they could be added. Are all of these tags and categories contributing to duplicate content? And if so What method should I go about to cleaning this up? The only thing that seems logical to me is rel=canonical. Thank you so much! Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Striventa1
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Faceted Navigation URLs Best Practices
 Hi, We are developing new Products Pages with faceted filters. You can see it here: https://www.viatrading.com/wholesale-products/ We have a feature allowing to Order By and Group By, which alters the order of all products. There will also be the option to view Products as a table, which will contain same products but with different design and maybe slightly different content of each product. All this will happen without changing the URL, https://www.viatrading.com/all/ Is this the best practice? Thanks, Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | viatrading10
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Google cache is showing my UK homepage site instead of the US homepage and ranking the UK site in US
 Hi There, When I check the cache of the US website (www.us.allsaints.com) Google returns the UK website. This is also reflected in the US Google Search Results when the UK site ranks for our brand name instead of the US site. The homepage has hreflang tags only on the homepage and the domains have been pointed correctly to the right territories via Google Webmaster Console.This has happened before in 26th July 2015 and was wondering if any had any idea why this is happening or if any one has experienced the same issueFDGjldR Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | adzhass0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Is it alright to repeat a keyword in the title tag?
 I know at first glance, the answer to this is a resounding NO, that it can be construed as keyword stuffing, Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MIGandCo
 but please hear me out. I am working on optimizing a client's website and although MOST of the title tags
 can be optimized without repeating a keyword, occasionally I run into one where it doesn't read right if I
 don't repeat the keyword. Here's an example: Current title:
 Photoshop on the Cloud | Adobe Photoshop Webinars | Company Name What I am considering using as the optimized title:
 Adobe Photoshop on the Cloud | Adobe Photoshop Webinars | Company Name Yes, I know both titles are longer than recommended. In both instances, only the company name gets
 truncated so I am not too worried about that. So I guess what I want to know is this: Am I right in my original assumption that it is NEVER okay to
 repeat keywords in a title tag or is it alright when it makes sense to do so?0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Best practice for H1 on site without H1 - Alternative methods?
 I have recently set up a mens style blog - the site is made up of articles pulled in from a CMS and I am wanting to keep the design as clean as possible - so no text other than the articles. This makes it hard to get a H1 tag into the page - are there any solutions/alternatives? that would be good for SEO? The site is http://www.iamtheconnoisseur.com/ Thanks Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SWD.Advertising0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Best practice for retiring old product pages
 We’re a software company. Would someone be able to help me with a basic process for retiring old product pages and re-directing the SEO value to new pages. We are retiring some old products to focus on new products. The new software has much similar functionality to the old software, but has more features. How can we ensure that the new pages get the best start in life? Also, what is the best way of doing this for users? Our plan currently is to: Leave the old pages up initially with a message to the user that the old software has been retired. There will also be a message explaining that the user might be interested in one of our new products and a link to the new pages. When traffic to these pages reduces, then we will delete these pages and re-direct them to the homepage. Has anyone got any recommendations for how we could approach this differently? One idea that I’m considering is to immediately re-direct the old product pages to the new pages. I was wondering if we could then provide a message to the user explaining that the old product has been retired but that the new improved product is available. I’d also be interested in pointing the re-directs to the new product pages that are most relevant rather than the homepage, so that they get the value of the old links. I’ve found in the past that old retirement pages for products can outrank the new pages as until you 301 them then all the links and authority flow to these pages. Any help would be very much appreciated 🙂 Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | RG_SEO0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		There's a website I'm working with that has a .php extension. All the pages do. What's the best practice to remove the .php extension across all pages?
 Client wishes to drop the .php extension on all their pages (they've got around 2k pages). I assured them that wasn't necessary. However, in the event that I do end up doing this what's the best practices way (and easiest way) to do this? This is also a WordPress site. Thanks. Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | digisavvy0
 
			
		 
			
		 
			
		 
			
		 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				