Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Google SERP shows wrong (and inappropriate) thumbnail for Facebook videos?
-
Hello
I'm running into a strange issue with at least one of my client's video. The video is posted on Facebook. When searching for the video on Google, the SERP shows a completely wrong, and inappropriate, thumbnail image. (And in one case the preview video starts playing within Google SERP.) It also seems that Google is indexing various countries' facebook page for the same video separately (it-it.facebook.com, fr-fr.facebook.com, etc). Note that only the thumbnail and preview video within Google are wrong; if you click on the link, you see the correct video and page.
I hesitate to divulge the actual client video, but there are some reports on Google's search community about the same behavior:
- Here's one that stargs back in March: https://support.google.com/webmasters/thread/33760205?hl=en
- and a more recent one: https://support.google.com/websearch/thread/71452151?hl=en
It looks increasingly like a bug in some google algorithm, but nobody at google seems to acknowledge that. I've unpublished the original video from FB and submitted an 'outdated content' removal to Google, which is pending.
In the meantime, my questions for our group of experts here:
- Has anyone else experienced this and any other suggestionso n how to fix?
- If we assume that this is not a google bug: how could a malicious actor or black-hat SEO influence Google's algorithms to cause this?
Thanks,
mickey
-
Removing (unpublishing) content from facebook and using Gogole's removal tool works after a day or two. However, the issue returns when re-publishing and reintroduces the content .
This looks a lot like a bug in Google's algorithm. In one case, they publish the same thumbnail photo for two different videos (although the titles were related):
-
Thanks for responding, seoelevated. I'll add sepecific details on the videoObject schema further down.
I've had some success with removing these from Google SERP following these steps:
- Un-publish the page from FB (or from wherever else, presumably)
- Submit the URLs (copied from Google SERP) to Google's "remove out dated content"
- Google will complain that the page is still live, but click "Yes", it has indeed been updated or removed
- Select "the snippet and cache are outdated". (If you select " completely removed," the request will be Denied)
- Add some word from the google SERP snippet that would not appear on the updated page.
- repeat this process for all versions of this.
For step 6, I had submitted removal rquests for the same video on facebook.com, de-de.facebook.com, and zh-cn.facebook.com. I did not, however, submit it-it.facebok.com, and the wrong thumbnail still shows up on that page. (I just submitted that for removal as well.)
Next steps: I'll re-publish the facebook video pages and see what happens
Now, about schema: Yes I've checked the VideoObject schema. Here is an example with an unrelated video, one that also has an unrelated image but not an offensive one: https://www.facebook.com/CIPEDC/videos/10152675950170686/
When I look at the schema JSON on the page source I see a correct thumbnail: https://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t15.5256-10/10963580_10152675951280686_1532157832_n.jpg?_nc_cat=103&_nc_sid=ed1892&_nc_ohc=3RP7d75npd4AX94ZsXC&_nc_ht=scontent-iad3-1.xx&oh=23f2c96e4bad740fcc2cbaf7f9b33bd0&oe=5F90B8FD :
_ "thumbnailUrl": "https://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t15.5256-10/10963580_10152675951280686_1532157832_n.jpg?_nc_cat=103&_nc_sid=ed1892&_nc_ohc=3RP7d75npd4AX94ZsXC&nc_ht=scontent-iad3-1.xx&oh=23f2c96e4bad740fcc2cbaf7f9b33bd0&oe=5F90B8FD",
This is an appropriate thumbnail for this video.
When I run the video URL through Google's Rich Results tester I get a different ThumbnailURL: https://lookaside.fbsbx.com/lookaside/crawler/media/?media_id=10152675950170686&get_thumbnail=1
This redirects to to the video page on Facebook--at least it does so on a browser and with curl:
< HTTP/2 302
< vary: Accept-Encoding
< pragma: no-cache
< location: https://www.facebook.com/CIPEDC/videos/10152675950170686/?is_lookaside=1It's possible that Facebook responds with a different URL or redirect based on user-agent, of course.
I also ran this through LinkedIn's post inspector. It picked up the same image as GOogle but can't render it:
https://www.linkedin.com/post-inspector/inspect/https:%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2FCIPEDC%2Fvideos%2F10152675950170686%2Fmickey
-
This is very interesting, and I see from the threads you linked that multiple businesses are having the same problem and the same difficulty navigating both the Google or Facebook support communities. Out of curiosity, are you able to inspect one of your Facebook pages whcih still has the video, and see if any schema for the type "VideoObject" is included in the page, and if so, paste the markup here (redacted as necessary)? I don't think I'll probably be able to help much on this, but perhaps something in the schema data might give some clues to the community here to work with.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google Indexed Images: Website Vs Social Media
I use Pinterest, Twitter and Instagram to post images that are already featured on my website. I have been following a routine of uploading the images to these social media platforms only after I can see Google has indexed the image from my original site. My website is ecommerce and the product images drive sales more than any other factor. The thinking behind my method was that when these images are posted on Pinterest, Twitter and the various Instagram crawler sites (I realise Instagram images aren’t indexed directly), Google would recognise that the image was already attributed to my website. The ‘duplicate’ image would not therefore be indexed and the originally uploaded website image would remain in ‘Google Images’. After completing various searches and reviewing other Q&A’s on Moz, it seems as though this is in no way guaranteed and images reposted on social media platforms may still replace the already indexed image from the website. I am assuming this is because Google views these platforms as more authoritative than mine. I usually change the image by adding logos, text, backgrounds, borders etc before posting on Pinterest and this seems to have worked most of the time (both the original and ‘amended for Pinterest’ versions are often indexed) but images posted on other platforms are usually identical. Does it make sense to continue with my method or am I shooting myself in the foot by reposting these images on social media at all? I obviously want customers searching for products, who then click on an image, to be directed to my site rather than one of my social media pages or worse, an image reposting site. Additionally, If I post images on social media before they are uploaded to my website (for example to tease a product launch), would Google likely class these images as the ‘original’ and therefore be less likely to index the website version of the image once it is uploaded? Any thoughts are appreciated.
Social Media | | g3mmab2 -
Question about understanding Google Ranking System
Hi, I have too many question that I need answer to understand Google ranking system. I have been analyzing different website in different niche, but puzzling to understand how Google rank actually. Some websites have good number of backlinks with good SEO metrics, but some low SEO profiled websiites outrank good sites. I am here with my first question. I am working for one client website who sell sex toys online. So we are optimizing keywords like sex toys, buy sex toys, sex shop, sex toy store and too many keywords to rank on google.ca. My client website is cupidboutique.com. We have some competitors that I want to mention below: 1. PinkCherry: This is one of our big competitor. They have 2 domain one is for US and one is for Canada. Both websites ranking well for different keywords. Basically .ca domain is more successful than .com domain. But I am surprise why Google consider the websites for rank. If you see, both websites are identical, that means both website have same product, same category structure, and the most important all products description are duplicate on each domain. On google webmaster guideline, google mention that if 2 domain have identical content, then Google ignore the duplicate one in ranking. But still both websites ranking for different search term. I compare the SEO metrics of our domain and their .ca domain, there is not big difference. Our websites also have good number of links, good PA/DA, even more good number of social sharing than them. But our rankings are not even comparable with them. They are ranking within 20-30th on Google for different product category keywords, but not our. 2. Hushcanada: This is another website ranking well, but I a surprise how? This website is ranking on very high competitive keyword with very fewer number of backlinks. Their PA/DA, number of backlinks, social sharing all metrics are very few. Their business also established recently that is 2013, which I found through archive.org, whereas our client business has been running since 2003-2004. As a Ecommerce business website their homepage is not showing any product , their catalog can be found under "shop online" page only. There are even some more websites ranking well with very low SEO metrics in this niche. If Google is not looking for these SEO staff, then what other staff Google looks to rank website? Hope I will get some favorable answer of my question.
Social Media | | moonheart0 -
What do you do when your Facebook page is Unpublished?
The page in question has been there for about 5 years and has about 80 followers. It is for a business that sells steel plate (B2B) and everything is totally compliant with Facebook T&C as far as I can tell. It's been unpublished with the statement "Your Page has been unpublished and it cannot be published again." We did an appeal about 6 weeks ago and heard absolutely nothing.... Generally we got no likes, no comments and reached about 20 people with each post. So I am lost as to why we were banned and lost as to what we do next It's fine if they want to unpublish - it's their site - what's frustrating is the arbitrariness, the lack of information as to why it was banned and lack of communication. It's fine if it's a spam site (except if you are a spammer) but I'm selling boring steel plates..... pwqkaz1xzkx7myx2ncwn
Social Media | | Zippy-Bungle0 -
Where do the Facebook star ratings come from?
I have a client whose FB page has a 5 star rating (apparently from 5 reviews) but I have no clue from where they are aggregated? I tried Google-ing for answers with no luck! Any idea? This is the page I am referring to... https://www.facebook.com/pages/Partners-in-Womens-Health-of-Jupiter-LLC/310303442400699?bookmark_t=page
Social Media | | RickyShockley0 -
Does Google prefer YouTube video's embedded on a site or put in a Pop up image class for SEO purposes
Our company is an eCommerce site for aftermarket automotive accessories, we have been posting videos on our site. On some pages we have videos embedded from Youtube and on other pages the videos are embedded but in a Popup Image Class. Below I'll provide an example of one way we put the popup image class on our site <iframe id="vidf" style="display:none;" width="460" height="320" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/MattCutts?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen=""></iframe> Now concerning SEO would it be better just to embed a video the traditional way or use the popup image class? The reason I ask is because the popup image class hides the video on the page with an image on top then once you click that image the video pops up. Can Google still crawl/see the video? What would be best practice for SEO?
Social Media | | WebRiverGroup0 -
Shortcut Link and Referral domain in Google Analytics
Hello, One of my clients has a Facebook page for his company, and his social media manager posts some promotional and educational posts on daily basis. the social media manager uses affiliate ID's in the destination URL to track traffic and leads that come from the social media and to make it look nicer he uses shortcut links service - bitly. Now I have a few questions about this: I don't see traffic comes from bit.ly or bitly.com in Google Analytics, my question: is using 301 redirect makes Google Analytics understand that the last website which sent the traffic to my website is not the actual Referral website? Is using shortcut links in the social media damages the links value (even though they are <nofollow>links - but still considered as signals from social media</nofollow> Thanks. LorS1nd.jpg
Social Media | | JonsonSwartz0 -
Best option for Facebook Page/Usernames?
Hey guys My first post here! currently trialling seomoz and impressed so far 🙂 My question relates to a choice of Facebook page/username for a client whose preference is to refer to their online business name by the domain name, where this business name includes his two most important keywords. So as an example: firstsecondthird.co.uk Now in terms of seo that's fine as search engines factor in keywords in the domain name, and even referring to domain name in website copy does not seem to pose too many issues. However on Facebook I've noticed that if we go with page name of: FirstSecondThird (obsiously we can't add .co.uk - I've used camel case for readability) then when using the facebook search the page does NOT get listed for any of the keywords as it appears it only matches on whole strings. So I'm going to recommend that he changes Faceook page name to First Second Third (with spaces) even though client does not really like this option. Do you guys think that makes sense? Also if I do make that change should I also go with fixed Username of First-Second-Third i.e. with hyphens or stick with one long string i.e. FirstSecondThird, which matches the domain name? Any advice appreciated. PS hope this is under right topic- several others seemed applicable Thanks
Social Media | | redactuk0 -
Is there any SEO benefit to hosting your Facebook photos on your own site?
I will often post photos that I have taken to my Facebook page (either personal or my fan page). Sometimes these can get lots of likes. I got thinking that perhaps I host these photos on my site (i.e. www.example.com/images/photo1.jpg) and then share that "page" on Facebook. That way any of the likes would be counted towards my site. What do you guys think?
Social Media | | MarieHaynes0