Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Moving site from www to non www and also hosting to vps what will be the effect?
- 
					
					
					
					
 Hi SEO gurus, 
 I am trying to move my site from shared hosting to VPS hosting and also moving from www to non www version.
 What is the best possible way to avoid any issue and without losing the backlinks.
 Is it good or bad to do? URL: https://buylikesservices.com/
- 
					
					
					
					
 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Private hosting is better but it comes more expensive 
- 
					
					
					
					
 I have a website The Tourist Spot, earlier it was indexed with a non-www version but later I got it redirected to the www version. But when check my indexed pages on google, I find that I have both versions of the website indexed. Now I want to remove the non-www version. I tried to remove using the console but there was a notification that if I submit to delete page then all versions will be removed from google for the next 6 months. Now I need help to remove/deindex the non-www version. Anyone help me, please? 
- 
					
					
					
					
 To have a unique domain structure, you should redirect www to nonwww using 301 redirect as other members said too. And regarding changing your webhosting, the best way is to migrate your website content at first and when everything was ready at your new hosting, then change nameservers of your domain through the control panel of your domain, In this case your website faces least downtime. Changing hosting only changes the IP of your website and search engines understand it and its a normal procedure for almost all websites to change their webhosting. So only try to do it with lowest possible downtime. 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Why take the risk? Having your site load with the www doesn't hurt you. It's not as if the site will perform better without the www and if your site is configured properly your site will load no matter how you have that part of it set. Google views www.domain.com as a different site from domain.com. You can mitgiate your risk by doing 301 redirects from your www site to your non www but there is always going to be some amount of risk and the potential to see a temporary dip while Google figures out what just happened. Not sure I see enough benefit in making the move to warrant changing it. 
- 
					
					
					
					
 @seoblogs61 Hey, sorry for the super slow reply. Hosting shouldn't matter unless it changes the URLs (any further than you're deliberately changing them). Moving from www to non www means you need to make sure there is a 1:1 mapping of old to new URLs as 301 redirects. This may be possible using a server config rule. Be aware that any URL migration comes with SEO risks. The 301 redirects in theory will carry across most of the value of your backlinks, but there may be delays in Google understanding the new relationship, or a slight dilution, or some technical hitch which causes some URLs to not be caught by your rule. 
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
- 
		
		Moz ToolsChat with the community about the Moz tools. 
- 
		
		SEO TacticsDiscuss the SEO process with fellow marketers 
- 
		
		CommunityDiscuss industry events, jobs, and news! 
- 
		
		Digital MarketingChat about tactics outside of SEO 
- 
		
		Research & TrendsDive into research and trends in the search industry. 
- 
		
		SupportConnect on product support and feature requests. 
Related Questions
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		301 redirect hops from non-https and www
 It's best practice to minimize the amount of 301 redirect hops. Ideally only one redirect hop. It's also best practice to 301 redirect (or at least canonical) your non-https and/or your non-www (or www) to the canonical protocol/subdomain. The simplest (and possibly the most common) way to implement canonical protocol/subdomain redirects is through a load balancer or before your app processes the request. Both of which will just blanket 301 to the canonical domain/protocol regardless if the path exists or not In which case, you could have: Two hops. i.e. hop #1 http://example.com/foo to https://example.com/foo, hop #2 https://example.com/foo to https://example.com/bar 301 to a 404. Let's say https://example.com/dog never existed, but somebody for whatever reason linked to it (maybe a typo). If I request https://www.example.com/dog, the load balancer would 301 to a 404 page. Either scenario above should be fairly rare. However, you can't control how people link to you. Should I care about either above scenario? I could have my app attempt to check if the page exists before forwarding, but that code could be complicated. Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | dsbud0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Moving html site to wordpress and 301 redirect from index.htm to index.php or just www.example.com
 I found page duplicate content when using Moz crawl tool, see below. http://www.example.com Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | gozmoz
 Page Authority 40
 Linking Root Domains 31
 External Link Count 138
 Internal Link Count 18
 Status Code 200
 1 duplicate http://www.example.com/index.htm
 Page Authority 19
 Linking Root Domains 1
 External Link Count 0
 Internal Link Count 15
 Status Code 200
 1 duplicate I have recently transfered my old html site to wordpress.
 To keep the urls the same I am using a plugin which appends .htm at the end of each page. My old site home page was index.htm. I have created index.htm in wordpress as well but now there is a conflict of duplicate content. I am using latest post as my home page which is index.php Question 1.
 Should I also use redirect 301 im htaccess file to transfer index.htm page authority (19) to www.example.com If yes, do I use
 Redirect 301 /index.htm http://www.example.com/index.php
 or
 Redirect 301 /index.htm http://www.example.com Question 2
 Should I change my "Home" menu link to http://www.example.com instead of http://www.example.com/index.htm that would fix the duplicate content, as indx.htm does not exist anymore. Is there a better option? Thanks0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		6 .htaccess Rewrites: Remove index.html, Remove .html, Force non-www, Force Trailing Slash
 i've to give some information about my website Environment 1. i have static webpage in the root. 2. Wordpress installed in sub-dictionary www.domain.com/blog/ 3. I have two .htaccess , one in the root and one in the wordpress Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | NeatIT
 folder. i want to www to non on all URLs Remove index.html from url Remove all .html extension / Re-direct 301 to url
 without .html extension Add trailing slash to the static webpages / Re-direct 301 from non-trailing slash Force trailing slash to the Wordpress Webpages / Re-direct 301 from non-trailing slash Some examples domain.tld/index.html >> domain.tld/ domain.tld/file.html >> domain.tld/file/ domain.tld/file.html/ >> domain.tld/file/ domain.tld/wordpress/post-name >> domain.tld/wordpress/post-name/ My code in ROOT htaccess is <ifmodule mod_rewrite.c="">Options +FollowSymLinks -MultiViews RewriteEngine On
 RewriteBase / #removing trailing slash
 RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d
 RewriteRule ^(.*)/$ $1 [R=301,L] #www to non
 RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.(([a-z0-9_]+.)?domain.com)$ [NC]
 RewriteRule .? http://%1%{REQUEST_URI} [R=301,L] #html
 RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f
 RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d
 RewriteRule ^([^.]+)$ $1.html [NC,L] #index redirect
 RewriteCond %{THE_REQUEST} ^[A-Z]{3,9}\ /index.html\ HTTP/
 RewriteRule ^index.html$ http://domain.com/ [R=301,L]
 RewriteCond %{THE_REQUEST} .html
 RewriteRule ^(.*).html$ /$1 [R=301,L]</ifmodule> The above code do 1. redirect www to non-www
 2. Remove trailing slash at the end (if exists)
 3. Remove index.html
 4. Remove all .html
 5. Redirect 301 to filename but doesn't add trailing slash at the end0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Will obfuscating HTML have a bad effect on my ranking?
 I would like to obfuscate my HTML so that people do not see that I used a Template on my site. Does obfuscating HTML have a bad effect on the ranking in google? Thanks! Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | RWW0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Question about moving content from one site to another without a 301
 I could use a second opinion about moving content from some inactive sites to my main site. Once upon a time, we had a handful of geotargeted websites set up targeting various cities that we serve. This was in addition to our main site, which was mostly targeted to our primary office and ranked great for those keywords. Our main site has plenty of authority, has been around for ages, etc. We built out these geo-targeted sites with some good landing pages and kept them active with regularly scheduled blog posts which were unique and either interesting or helpful. Although we had a little success with these, we eventually saw the light and realized that our main site was strong enough to rank for these cities as well, which made life a whole lot easier, not to mention a lot less spammy. We've got some good content on these other sites that I'd like to use on our main site, especially the blog posts. Now that I've got it through my head that there's no such thing as a duplicate content penalty, I understand that I could just start moving this content over so long as I put a 301 redirect in place where the content used to be on these old sites. Which leads me to my question. Our SEO was careful not to have these other websites pointing to our main site to avoid looking like we were trying to do something shady from a link building perspective. His concern is that these redirects would undermine that effort and having a bunch of redirects from a half dozen sites could end up hurting us somehow. Do you think that is the case? What he is suggesting we do is remove all of the content that we'd like to use and use Webmaster Tools to request that this content be removed from the index. Then, after the sites have been recrawled, we'll check for ourselves to confirm they've been removed and proceed with using the content however we'd like. Thoughts? Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | LeeAbrahamson0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Other domains hosted on same server showing up in SERP for 1st site's keywords
 For the website in question, the first domain alphabetically on the shared hosting space, strange search results are appearing on the SERP for keywords associated with the site. Here is an example: A search for "unique company name" shows the results: www.uniquecompanyname.com as the top result. But on pages 2 and 3, we are getting results for the same content but for domains hosted on the same server. Here are some examples with the domain name replaced: UNIQUE DOMAIN NAME PAGE TITLE Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Motava
 ftp.DOMAIN2.com/?action=news&id=63
 META DESCRIPTION TEXT UNIQUE DOMAIN NAME PAGE TITLE 2
 www.DOMAIN3.com/?action=news&id=120
 META DESCRIPTION TEXT2 UNIQUE DOMAIN NAME PAGE TITLE 2
 www.DOMAIN4.com/?action=news&id=120
 META DESCRIPTION TEXT2 UNIQUE DOMAIN NAME PAGE TITLE 3
 mail.DOMAIN5.com/?action=category&id=17
 META DESCRIPTION TEXT3 ns5.DOMAIN6.com/?action=article&id=27 There are more but those are just some examples. These other domain names being listed are other customer domains on the same VPS shared server. When clicking the result the browser URL still shows the other customer domain name B but the content is usually the 404 page. The page title and meta description on that page is not displayed the same as on the SERP.As far as we can tell, this is the only domain this is occurring for.So far, no crawl errors detected in Webmaster Tools and moz crawl not completed yet.0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Franchise sites on subdomains
 I've been asked by a client to optimise a a webpage for a location i.e. London. Turns out that the location is actually a franchise of the main company. When the company launch a new franchise, so far they have simply added a new page to the main site, for example: mysite.co.uk/sub-folder/london They have so far done this for 10 or so franchises and task someone with optimising that page for their main keyword + location. I think I know the answer to this, but would like to get a back up / additional info on it in terms of ranking / seo benefits. I am going to suggest the idea of using a subdomain for each location, example: london.mysite.co.uk Would this be the correct approach. If you think yes, why? Many thanks, Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Webrevolve0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Badges For a B2b site
 love this seo tactic but it seems hard to get people to adopt it Has anyone seen a successful badge campaign for a b2b site? please provide examples if you can. Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | DavidKonigsberg0
 
			
		 
				
		 
			
		 
			
		 
			
		 
			
		 
			
		 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				