Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Prevent link juice to flow on low-value pages
- 
					
					
					
					
 Hello there! Most of the websites have links to low-value pages in their main navigation (header or footer)... thus, available through every other pages. I especially think about "Conditions of Use" or "Privacy Notice" pages, which have no value for SEO. What I would like, is to prevent link juice to flow into those pages... but still keep the links for visitors. What is the best way to achieve this? - Put a rel="nofollow" attribute on those links?
- Put a "robots" meta tag containing "noindex,nofollow" on those pages?
- Put a "Disallow" for those pages in a "robots.txt" file?
- Use efficient Javascript links? (that crawlers won't be able to follow)
 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Mmh, good point. Never heard that "privacy policy page" could be a trust signal. Is there an article somewhere that talks about this? Well, I took those two pages as an example... but my question was about avoiding link juice to flow on non-SEO pages in general. Thanks a lot for your answers! 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Exactly, and what I also try to explain to people is that privacy policy type page is additional signal for Google when they try to understand the type of site you are and how trustworthy it is. Why in the world would you noindex something like that? 
- 
					
					
					
					
 As I understand it nofollow still dilutes your link juice even though it does not pass PR (theoretically). Google made this announcement to combat PR sculpting in 2009. Here is a post from Rand about it. Unlsee something has changed that I am not aware of you could link in an iFrame and Google will not see it, nor will it dilute your PR passed out. 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Great suggestions. I've recently combined some pages (login/register, about/contact/ToS/privacy, and a few others) and have been very happy with the results. I removed 8 links from every page. I am also thinking about removing some more links from my product pages, to try and keep the most juice on those pages. Those pages don't need the same navigation as the homepage. 
- 
					
					
					
					
 It depends on what your purpose is. If you want them totally block from being index then putting the page in the robots.tx fil or using a robots meta tag would work fine. If you just want to de-emphasize the page to the search engines you can use nofollows or javascript links on footer/header links. One thing that we have done is to combine some of these pages (terms and privacy) into one page to cut down on the number of total links on each page. You could also not include the privacy page link on every page (depending on your site) but just link it from certain pages that collect sensitive data (near the form). I hope this helps. The main thing to remember is that each site is different so you will have to adjust your tactics depending on precisely what you are trying to accomplish. 
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
- 
		
		Moz ToolsChat with the community about the Moz tools. 
- 
		
		SEO TacticsDiscuss the SEO process with fellow marketers 
- 
		
		CommunityDiscuss industry events, jobs, and news! 
- 
		
		Digital MarketingChat about tactics outside of SEO 
- 
		
		Research & TrendsDive into research and trends in the search industry. 
- 
		
		SupportConnect on product support and feature requests. 
Related Questions
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Landing page separate from product page
 Hello there, I have a wordpress website with a woocommerce plugin. I have 4 landing pages that describe my products and at the end of the pages, I have a CTA to my product page. is it bad for SEO? my website: https://relationadviser.ir On-Page Optimization | | Aaron.be1
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Should I optimize my home-page or a sub-page for my most important keyword
 Quick question: When choosing the most important keyword set that I would like to rank for, would I be better off optimizing my homepage, or a sub page for this keyword. My thinking goes as follows: The homepage (IE www.mysite.com) naturally has more backlinks and thus a better Google Page Rank. However, there are certain things I could do to a subpage (IE www.mysite.com/green-widgets-los-angeles ) that I wouldn't want to do to the homepage, which might be more "optimal" overall. Option C, I suppose, would be to optimize both the homepage, and a single sub-page, which is seeming like a pretty good solution, but I have been told that having multiple pages optimized for the same keywords might "confuse" search engines. Would love any insight on this! On-Page Optimization | | Jacob_A2
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Listing all services on one page vs separate pages per service
 My company offers several generalized categories with more specific services underneath each category. Currently the way it's structured is if you click "Voice" you get a full description of each voice service we offer. I have a feeling this is shooting us in the foot. Would it be better to have a general overview of the services we offer on the "Voice" page that then links to the specified service? The blurb about the service on the overview page would be unique, not taken from the actual specific service's page. On-Page Optimization | | AMATechTel0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Page rank check
 Hello everyone, How long should I wait to see if page rank for optimized pages have improved? cheers On-Page Optimization | | PremioOscar0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Too many links on page -- how to fix
 We are getting reports that there are too many links on most of the pages in one of the sites we manage. Not just a few too many... 275 (versus <100 that is the target). The entire site is built with a very heavy global navigation, which contains a lot of links -- so while the users don't see all of that, Google does. Short of re-architecting the site, can you suggest ways to provide site navigation that don't violate this rule? On-Page Optimization | | novellseo2
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Do we have too many links in our footer?
 Hi guys, we have 41 links on our holiday(vacation) rental website, this seems too many when looking at best practice. 24 of these are links to community pages while 8 link to activities pages. The community and activity pages are also accessible from links on the top menu so they are not strictly necessary but do get 10% of site clickthroughs according to Google in-page analytics. I therefore do not want to remove the links if there is no good evidence that google will penalize us for this. What do you think would be best for our site? Thanks, John Tulley. footer.jpg On-Page Optimization | | JohnTulley0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Tag clouds: good for internal linking and increase of keyword relevant pages?
 As Matt Cutts explained, tag clouds are OK if you're not engaged in keyword stuffing (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bYPX_ZmhLqg) - i.e. if you're not putting in 500 tags. I'm currently creating tags for an online-bookseller; just like Amazon this e-commerce-site has potentially a couple of million books. Tag clouds will be added to each book detail page in order to enrich each of these pages with relevant keywords both for search engines and users (get a quick overview over the main topics of the book; navigate the site and find other books associated with each tag). Each of these book-specific tag clouds will hold up to 50 tags max, typically rather in the range of up to 10-20. From an SEO perspective, my question is twofold: 1. Does the site benefit from these tag clouds by improving the internal linking structure? 2. Does the site benefit from creating lots of additional tag-specific-pages (up to 200k different tags) or can these pages become a problem, as they don't contain a lot of rich content as such but rather lists of books associated with each tag? Thanks in advance! On-Page Optimization | | semantopic0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Would it be bad to change the canonical URL to the most recent page that has duplicate content, or should we just 301 redirect to the new page?
 Is it bad to change the canonical URL in the tag, meaning does it lose it's stats? If we add a new page that may have duplicate content, but we want that page to be indexed over the older pages, should we just change the canonical page or redirect from the original canonical page? Thanks so much! -Amy On-Page Optimization | | MeghanPrudencio0
 
			
		 
			
		 
			
		 
			
		 
			
		 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				