Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Suspicious external links to site have 302 redirects
- 
					
					
					
					
 Hi, I have been asked to look at a site where I suspect some questionable SEO work, particularly link building. The site does seem to be performing very poorly in Google since January 2014, although there are no messages in WMT. Using WMT, OPenSiteExplorer, Majestic & NetPeak, I have analysed inbound links and found a group of links which although are listed in WMT, etc appear to 302 redirect to a directory in China (therefore the actual linking domain is not visible). It looks like a crude type of link farm, but I cant understand why they would use 302s not 301s. The domains are not visible due to redirects. Should I request a disavow or ignore? The linking domains are listed below: http://www.basalts.cn/ 
 http://www.chinamarbles.com.cn/
 http://www.china-slate.com.cn/
 http://www.granitecountertop.com.cn/
 http://www.granite-exporter.com/
 http://www.sandstones.biz/
 http://www.stone-2.com/
 http://www.stonebuild.cn/
 http://www.stonecompany.com.cn/
 http://www.stonecontact.cn/
 http://www.stonecrate.com/
 http://www.stonedesk.com/
 http://www.stonedvd.com/
 http://www.stonepark.cn/
 http://www.stonetool.com.cn/
 http://www.stonewebsite.com/Thanks Steve 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Linda, OK, thanks. Grateful to have another opinion on it. It seems like this site has suffered, but the rest of links look reasonable. However, the previous SEO done appears to have been link building with complete absence of keyword research and subsequent optimisation of pages, posts, etc. Regards, Steve 
- 
					
					
					
					
 As strict as Google can be, I have never heard of them penalizing anyone for something bad they used to do (but didn't get caught at) and have now stopped doing. I think they reserve their penalties for current bad actions. [Which is not to say you were doing something bad--we are talking about your wanting to be sure that it doesn't appear to Google that you tried something bad.] In general, I think it's best not to disavow unless it is an extreme situation. As Google itself says: "In most cases, Google can assess which links to trust without additional guidance, so most normal or typical sites will not need to use this tool." 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Linda, Thanks. It appears that the domains are all owned by the same / person entity and could it be that there is any legacy effect of having these links prior to 302? Regards Steve 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Since the links are using 302 redirects they are not passing any link juice, so I can't imagine that you'd be penalized for them. 
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
- 
		
		Moz ToolsChat with the community about the Moz tools. 
- 
		
		SEO TacticsDiscuss the SEO process with fellow marketers 
- 
		
		CommunityDiscuss industry events, jobs, and news! 
- 
		
		Digital MarketingChat about tactics outside of SEO 
- 
		
		Research & TrendsDive into research and trends in the search industry. 
- 
		
		SupportConnect on product support and feature requests. 
Related Questions
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Preventing CNAME Site Duplications
 Hello fellow mozzers! Let me see if I can explain this properly. First, our server admin is out of contact at the moment, White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | David-Kley
 so we are having to take this project on somewhat blind. (forgive the ignorance of terms). We have a client that needs a cname record setup, as they need a sales.DOMAIN.com to go to a different
 provider of data. They have a "store" platform that is hosted elsewhere and they require a cname to be
 sent to a custom subdomain they set up on their end. My question is, how do we prevent the cname from being indexed along with the main domain? If we
 process a redirect for the subdomain, then the site will not be able to go out and grab the other providers
 info and display it. Currently, if you type in the sales.DOMAIN.com it shows the main site's homepage.
 That cannot be allow to take place as we all know, having more than one domain with
 exact same content = very bad for seo. I'd rather not rely on Google to figure it out. Should we just have the cname host (where its pointing at) add a robots rule and have it set to not index
 the cname? The store does not need to be indexed, as the items are changed almost daily. Lastly, is an A record required for this type of situation in any way? Forgive my ignorance of subdomains, cname records and related terms. Our server admin being
 unavailable is not helping this project move along any. Any advice on the best way to handle
 this would be very helpful!0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Do I lose link juice if I have a https site and someone links to me using http instead?
 We have recently launched a https site which is getting some organic links some of which are using https and some are using http. Am I losing link juice on the ones linked using http even though I am redirecting or does Google view them the same way? As most people still use http naturally will it look strange to google if I contact anyone who has given us a link and ask them to change to https? White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Lisa-Devins0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Remedies, Cure, and Precautions for 302 redirect Hijacking.
 Hi Moz Guys, I hope all of you are good out there. I am here to discuss remedies, cure, and precautions for 302 redirect hijacking. Although it is quite old and whenever I searched in Google, it looks like a long gone glitch of Google serps but it just happened to one of my customers' site. The site in question is www(dot)solidswiss(dot)cd. If you check the cache(cache:site) then you can see a hijacked site in the urls of the cached page. As a result all my customer's listing in the serps are replaced with this site. This hacked site then is redirecting to a competitor's site. I did many things to cop with the problem, site came back in the serps but hackers are doing this on lots of domains so when it recovered from one site then another site catches it. I am doing lots of reporting on submit spam site. I am doing lots of feedback on the serps page. I have switched to https . But seems like nothing is working. This community is full of experts and technical people. I am wondering that what are your views and suggestions to handle the problem permanently? White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | adqas0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		How do you change the 6 links under your website in Google?
 Hello everyone, I have no idea how to ask this question, so I'm going to give it a shot and hopefully someone can help me!! My company is called Eteach, so when you type in Eteach into Google, we come in the top position (phew!) but there are 6 links that appear underneath it (I've added a picture to show what I mean). How do you change these links?? I don't even know what to call them, so if there is a particular name for these then please let me know! They seem to be an organic rank rather than PPC...but if I'm wrong then do correct me! Thanks! zorIsxH.jpg White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Eteach_Marketing0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Site dropped suddenly. Is it due to htaccess?
 I had a new site that was ranking on the first page for 5 keywords. My site was hacked recently and I went through a lot of trouble to restore it. Last night, I discovered that my site was nowhere to be found but when i searched site: mysite.com, it was still ranking which means it was not penalized. I discovered the issue to be a .htaccess and it have been resolved. My question is now that the .htaccess issue is resolved , will my site be restored back to the first page? Is there additional things that i should do? I have notified google by submitting my site White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | semoney0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Link Building using Badges
 In light of penguin update, is link building using badges(like "I love SEOMOZ" badge) still considered a white hat tactic? I have read old posts on SEOMOZ blog about this topic and wondering if this method is still effective. Look forward to feedback from MOZers. White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Amjath0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Does anyone have any suggestions on removing spammy links?
 I have some clients that recently got hit by "Penguin" they have several less than desireable backlinks that could be the issue? Does anyone have any suggestions on getting these removed? What are the odds that a webmaster on these spammy sites are going to remove them, and is it worth the time and effort? White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | RonMedlin3
 
			
		 
			
		 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				