• majorAlexa

        See all notifications

        Skip to content
        Moz logo Menu open Menu close
        • Products
          • Moz Pro
          • Moz Pro Home
          • Moz Local
          • Moz Local Home
          • STAT
          • Moz API
          • Moz API Home
          • Compare SEO Products
          • Moz Data
        • Free SEO Tools
          • Domain Analysis
          • Keyword Explorer
          • Link Explorer
          • Competitive Research
          • MozBar
          • More Free SEO Tools
        • Learn SEO
          • Beginner's Guide to SEO
          • SEO Learning Center
          • Moz Academy
          • MozCon
          • Webinars, Whitepapers, & Guides
        • Blog
        • Why Moz
          • Digital Marketers
          • Agency Solutions
          • Enterprise Solutions
          • Small Business Solutions
          • The Moz Story
          • New Releases
        • Log in
        • Log out
        • Products
          • Moz Pro

            Your all-in-one suite of SEO essentials.

          • Moz Local

            Raise your local SEO visibility with complete local SEO management.

          • STAT

            SERP tracking and analytics for enterprise SEO experts.

          • Moz API

            Power your SEO with our index of over 44 trillion links.

          • Compare SEO Products

            See which Moz SEO solution best meets your business needs.

          • Moz Data

            Power your SEO strategy & AI models with custom data solutions.

          Let your business shine with Listings AI
          Moz Local

          Let your business shine with Listings AI

          Learn more
        • Free SEO Tools
          • Domain Analysis

            Get top competitive SEO metrics like DA, top pages and more.

          • Keyword Explorer

            Find traffic-driving keywords with our 1.25 billion+ keyword index.

          • Link Explorer

            Explore over 40 trillion links for powerful backlink data.

          • Competitive Research

            Uncover valuable insights on your organic search competitors.

          • MozBar

            See top SEO metrics for free as you browse the web.

          • More Free SEO Tools

            Explore all the free SEO tools Moz has to offer.

          NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic
          Moz Pro

          NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic

          Learn more
        • Learn SEO
          • Beginner's Guide to SEO

            The #1 most popular introduction to SEO, trusted by millions.

          • SEO Learning Center

            Broaden your knowledge with SEO resources for all skill levels.

          • On-Demand Webinars

            Learn modern SEO best practices from industry experts.

          • How-To Guides

            Step-by-step guides to search success from the authority on SEO.

          • Moz Academy

            Upskill and get certified with on-demand courses & certifications.

          • MozCon

            Save on Early Bird tickets and join us in London or New York City

          Unlock flexible pricing & new endpoints
          Moz API

          Unlock flexible pricing & new endpoints

          Find your plan
        • Blog
        • Why Moz
          • Digital Marketers

            Simplify SEO tasks to save time and grow your traffic.

          • Small Business Solutions

            Uncover insights to make smarter marketing decisions in less time.

          • Agency Solutions

            Earn & keep valuable clients with unparalleled data & insights.

          • Enterprise Solutions

            Gain a competitive edge in the ever-changing world of search.

          • The Moz Story

            Moz was the first & remains the most trusted SEO company.

          • New Releases

            Get the scoop on the latest and greatest from Moz.

          Surface actionable competitive intel
          New Feature

          Surface actionable competitive intel

          Learn More
        • Log in
          • Moz Pro
          • Moz Local
          • Moz Local Dashboard
          • Moz API
          • Moz API Dashboard
          • Moz Academy
        • Avatar
          • Moz Home
          • Notifications
          • Account & Billing
          • Manage Users
          • Community Profile
          • My Q&A
          • My Videos
          • Log Out

        The Moz Q&A Forum

        • Forum
        • Questions
        • My Q&A
        • Users
        • Ask the Community

        Welcome to the Q&A Forum

        Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

        1. Home
        2. Research & Trends
        3. White Hat / Black Hat SEO
        4. Can I leave off HTTP/HTTPS in a canonical tag?

        Moz Q&A is closed.

        After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.

        Can I leave off HTTP/HTTPS in a canonical tag?

        White Hat / Black Hat SEO
        5
        16
        21914
        Loading More Posts
        • Watching

          Notify me of new replies.
          Show question in unread.

        • Not Watching

          Do not notify me of new replies.
          Show question in unread if category is not ignored.

        • Ignoring

          Do not notify me of new replies.
          Do not show question in unread.

        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes
        Reply
        • Reply as question
        Locked
        This topic has been deleted. Only users with question management privileges can see it.
        • Shawn_Huber
          Shawn_Huber last edited by

          We are working on moving our site to HTTPS and I was asked by my dev team if it is required to declare HTTP or HTTPS in the canonical tag? I know that relative URL's are acceptable but cannot find anything about HTTP/HTTPS.

          Example of what they would like to do

          Has anyone done this?

          Any reason to not leave off the protocol?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • linklater
            linklater @Shawn_Huber last edited by

            Very good to hear, thanks Shawn!  The goal is to use absolute canonicals, but for a period of time, we may have to use protocol relative.  The redirects in place should avoid any duplicate content issues, which seems to be the big landmine.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • Everett
              Everett @Shawn_Huber last edited by

              That's good to know. Thanks for the update Shawn.

              Since the initial discussion took place several Google reps. have publicly stated that there is no PageRank loss between redirects and rel ="canonical" tags. This seems to substantiate their claim.

              The biggest issue with these is when giving conflicting instructions to user agents, such as a redirect to a page that rel canonicals back to the URL from which it was redirected, thus closing an infinite loop. For example, if you redirected from HTTP to HTTPS, but then the HTTPS version had a rel ="canonical" tag that was hard-coded to the HTTP version.

              The above issue doesn't apply because you're redirecting from HTTP to HTTPs, which shows a relative path rel canonical tag for the HTTPs domain.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • Shawn_Huber
                Shawn_Huber @linklater last edited by

                Now that our entire site is HTTPS, there does not seem to be any negative impact to our URL's by leaving off the HTTP protocol. If there was any traffic lost, it didn't seem significant as our reports did not indicate a decline. One year later, traffic through SEO is higher than before we implemented.

                I personally agree with Everett, don't leave things to chance. I did require that the homepage did have HTTPS for the canonical though.  I felt massive panic attacks while we were going through the transition. However, if you are unable to convince your developers the importance of using an absolute path for canonical this did not seem to have a negative impact on our site.

                I am glad that we didn't have any noticeable impact, but I am also glad that I didn't turn it into a bigger issue within our leadership team. Since we didn't see anything negative, it could've reduced my credibility within the business which would've had made it difficult for larger SEO problems.

                BTW, we are still using relative canonical tags today. (except the homepage, that still has HTTPS)

                Everett linklater 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • linklater
                  linklater last edited by

                  Hey Shawn, did using an unspecified HTTP/HTTPS protocol work for you in the canonical and/or HREF-LANG? We are going through a transition to HTTPS as well, and have multiple systems with some URLs that are hard coded. Hoping this solution would work as a short-term fix, while we update these pages to use a new, more dynamic system.

                  Shawn_Huber 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Everett
                    Everett last edited by

                    Shawn,

                    My advice would be to canonical everything to the HTTPS version using an absolute path. That would be the best practice. I understand that is not what you're doing and you aren't getting any errors, but site-wide use of rel canonicals is something that can do more harm than good if a search engine misinterprets what you're trying to accomplish.

                    Either way, good luck and keep us posted.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Andy.Drinkwater
                      Andy.Drinkwater @Shawn_Huber last edited by

                      No worries Shawn. I also hope it doesn't cause issues down the line. Everything in me is screaming "Don't do it!" 😉

                      Best of luck.

                      -Andy

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Shawn_Huber
                        Shawn_Huber @Andy.Drinkwater last edited by

                        I know, and that's what sucks. It appears to work, but goes against what seems to be best practice and since I cannot find other instances to state one or the other it's hard not to follow their logic.

                        I just hope it doesn't screw up everything in the end. Thanks for the discussion.

                        Andy.Drinkwater 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • Andy.Drinkwater
                          Andy.Drinkwater @Shawn_Huber last edited by

                          Well, if it works (which I didn't think it would!) then I guess that answers one question - and I ran that page through Screaming Frog just to confirm there are no issues and it does indeed canonical back to the https version of the page.

                          I just can't get out of the mindset that the format looks wrong. I haven't seen other instances of it done that way, and like you, have no documentation to suggest issues that might be caused.

                          Sorry I can't be of more help.

                          -Andy

                          Shawn_Huber 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • Shawn_Huber
                            Shawn_Huber @Andy.Drinkwater last edited by

                            Thanks Andy, I posted a reply to the other response that ties into your comment here. On the page I listed above, there are not errors if I use HTTPS and the canonical doesn't declare anything. We have SSL certs, just haven't made the big switch yet.

                            Andy.Drinkwater 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • Shawn_Huber
                              Shawn_Huber @PatrickDelehanty last edited by

                              Thanks for the answers, all of which I've passed on to them.

                              They have attempted this on a page and have not seen any errors or issues as of yet which is problematic for me in the sense of if I cannot show where any issue results by them taking shortcuts, they will not necessarily listen to my feedback.

                              Here is the URL that they have left off the protocol in the canonical

                              http://www.alaskaair.com/content/deals/flights/cheapest-flights-to-hawaii.aspx.

                              I use the Chrome extension Canonical which doesn't give me the icon indicating that I am not viewing the preferred URL. When I use HTTPS and view source it looks the same as it does with HTTP. Sometimes there are parameters in the URL like ?INT=AS_HomePage_-prodID:SEO and even with HTTP missing from the canonical it still seems to work.

                              Since I cannot find any documentation against doing it this way I am getting strong resistance to declaring HTTP and then going back at some point when it moves to HTTPS and updating. Like I've stated above, they are using this for links and assets on the site since our site moves back and forth between HTTPS and HTTP depending on what the customer is doing and they have found leaving off the protocol it makes their life easier and limits the errors that Andy below mentions.

                              https://www.alaskaair.com/content/deals/flights/cheapest-flights-to-hawaii.aspx

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • PatrickDelehanty
                                PatrickDelehanty @PatrickDelehanty last edited by

                                Hi again

                                To be clear, I think this would populate http://www.domain.com//www.domain.com as the where the canonical should be attributed to.

                                Hope this makes a bite more sense. Good luck!

                                Shawn_Huber 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • Andy.Drinkwater
                                  Andy.Drinkwater last edited by

                                  Example of what they would like to do

                                  That would be a no-no Shawn. If you are running over SSL, then you need to canonical back to the https version of the page. If you don't, you will end up with errors on the page (yellow warning triangle) and trust issues with Google. What they would like to do is canonical to a malformed URL which it could interpret as a file.

                                  Try going to any URL and just entering it as //www.domain.com

                                  -Andy

                                  Shawn_Huber 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • PatrickDelehanty
                                    PatrickDelehanty @Shawn_Huber last edited by

                                    Hi there

                                    According to Google...

                                    Avoid errors**:** use absolute paths rather than relative paths with the rel="canonical" link element. However, they then say (under "Prefer HTTPS over HTTP for canonical URLs)...


                                    Google prefers HTTPS pages over equivalent HTTP pages as canonical, except when there are conflicting signals such as the following:

                                    • The HTTPS page has an invalid SSL certificate.
                                    • The HTTPS page contains insecure dependencies.
                                    • The HTTPS page is roboted (and the HTTP page is not).
                                    • The HTTPS page redirects users to or through an HTTP page.
                                    • The HTTPS page has a rel="canonical" link to the HTTP page.
                                    • The HTTPS page contains a noindex robots meta tag

                                    Although our systems prefer HTTPS pages over HTTP pages by default, you can ensure this behavior by taking any of the following actions:

                                    • Add 301 or 302 redirects from the HTTP page to the HTTPS page.
                                    • Add a rel="canonical" link from the HTTP page to the HTTPS page.
                                    • Implement HSTS.

                                    To prevent Google from incorrectly making the HTTP page canonical, you should avoid the following practices:

                                    • Bad SSL certificates and HTTPS-to-HTTP redirects cause us to prefer HTTP very strongly. Implementing HSTS cannot override this strong preference.
                                    • Including the HTTP page in your sitemap or hreflang entries rather than the HTTPS version.
                                    • Implementing your SSL/TLS certificafe for the wrong host-variant: for example, example.com serving the certificate for www.example.com.  The certificate must match your complete site URL, or be a wildcard certificate that can be used for multiple subdomains on a domain.

                                    Since I don't know how your SSL is configured, I can't tell you one way or another, but if you have a https version of your pages, then head that direction. Having a relative protocol won't seem to work here for what you're asking.

                                    Read the above and let me know if that helps! Good luck!

                                    PatrickDelehanty 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • Shawn_Huber
                                      Shawn_Huber @PatrickDelehanty last edited by

                                      I did read that before I asked, it didn't really answer my question. I understand that relative URL's work, but leaving off the protocol declaration isn't relative it just leaves it up to the server to provide whether the site is secure or not.

                                      Since we use multiple systems across our site, there isn't an easy way to implement relative or absolute canonical tags which is why the dev's want to know if they can implement without HTTP/HTTPS. They like to do this with assets on the site and have started to code links in a similar manner. What I can't determine is if this will cause issues.

                                      PatrickDelehanty 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • PatrickDelehanty
                                        PatrickDelehanty last edited by

                                        Hi there

                                        According to Google, they want you to either use relative URLs or use absolute URLs. You can read more here.

                                        I recommend reading this so you can see the types of common mistakes they find and how to resolve those.

                                        Good luck!

                                        Shawn_Huber 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • 1 / 1
                                        • First post
                                          Last post

                                        Browse Questions

                                        Explore more categories

                                        • Moz Tools

                                          Chat with the community about the Moz tools.

                                        • SEO Tactics

                                          Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers

                                        • Community

                                          Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!

                                        • Digital Marketing

                                          Chat about tactics outside of SEO

                                        • Research & Trends

                                          Dive into research and trends in the search industry.

                                        • Support

                                          Connect on product support and feature requests.

                                        • See all categories

                                        Related Questions

                                        • imjonny

                                          How many links can you have on sitemap.html

                                          we have a lot of pages that we want to create crawlable paths to. How many links are able to be crawled on 1 page for sitemap.html

                                          White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | imjonny
                                          0
                                        • gamesecure

                                          Title Tag : use comma, pipe or colon (:)

                                          Hi, If Title has two and three keywords then which one is better option to separate them either with comma or pipe or colon. Example : Arvixe Review, Coupons (Jun 2015)  and Uptime Report  (I used (,) as a separator) Arvixe Review is primary keywords  and Coupons and Uptime are secondary keywords. Aim is rank on keywords like Arvixe Review, Arvixe Coupons and Arvixe Uptime.
                                          Also, including current month and year with Title tag and it will change every month. Its means every month our title is changed.
                                          Is this effect in SEO? Suggest best possible title for keywords like Arvixe Review, Coupons (Jun 2015)  and Uptime Report. Rajiv

                                          White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | gamesecure
                                          0
                                        • carlystemmer

                                          How/Why do I have so many Spam backlinks?

                                          I was looking in GWT yesterday and found we have several thousand "spam" backlinks...I am curious why this happens and how this happens? There are some links from websites/domains that are not mine that appear to be spam. However, we own a large group of domains and have noticed some of the links are coming from 2 of those sites/domains we own to my main site. The sites/domains are not active, we just own them. I am wondering how someone could access these domains that are not active and create spammy backlinks to my main website? (They created about 20,000 links). Thanks.

                                          White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | carlystemmer
                                          0
                                        • seequs

                                          Do Ghost Traffic/Spam Referrals factor into rankings, or do they just affect the CTR and Bounce Rate in Analytics?

                                          So, by now I'm sure everyone that pays attention to their Analytics/GWT's (or Search Console, now) has seen spam referral traffic and ghost traffic showing up (Ilovevitaly.com, simple-share-buttons.com, semalt.com, etc).  Here is my question(s)...  Does this factor into rankings in anyway?   We all know that click through rate and bounce rate (might) send signals to the algorithm and signal a low quality site, which could affect rankings. I guess what I'm asking is are they getting any of that data from Analytics?  Since ghost referral traffic never actually visits my site, how could it affect the CTR our Bounce Rate that the algorithm is seeing?  I'm hoping that it only affects my Bounce/CTR in Analytics and I can just filter that stuff out with filters in Analytics and it won't ever affect my rankings. But.... since we don't know where exactly the algorithm is pulling data on CTR and bounce rate, I guess I'm just worried that having a large amount of this spam/ghost traffic that I see in analytics could be causing harm to my rankings....  Sorry, long winded way of saying... Should I pay attention to this traffic?  Should I care about it?  Will it harm my site or my rankings at all?  And finally... when is google going to shut these open back doors in Analytics so that Vitaly and his ilk are shut down forever?

                                          White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | seequs
                                          2
                                        • edward-may

                                          I'm changing title tags and meta tags, url, will i loose my ranking?

                                          Hi Guys QUESTION: I'm currently going through a re-design for my new website that was published in November 2014 - since launching we found there were many things we needed to change, our pages were content thin being one of the biggest. I had industry experts that came in and made comments on the title tags lacking relevance for eg: our title tag for our home page is currently "Psychic Advice" most ideal customers don't search "Psychic Advice" they search more like "Online Psychic Reading" or Psychic Readings" I noticed alot of my competitors also were using title tags such as Online Psychic Readings, Free Psychic Readings etc so it brings me to my question of "changing the title tags around.  The issue is, im ranking for two keywords in my industry, online psychics and online psychic readings in NZ. 1. Our home page and category pages are content thin.... so hoping that adding the changes will create perhaps some consistency also with the added unique and quality content. Here is the current website: zenory. co.nz and the new one is www.ew-zenory.herokuapp.com which is currently in development I have 3 top level domains com,com.au, and co.nz Is there anyone that can give me an idea if I were to change my home page title tag to **ZENORY | Online Psychic Readings | Live Psychic Phone and Chat ** If this will push my rankings down though this page will have alot more valuable content etc?  For obvious reasons im going to guess it will make drop, I'm wondering though if it is worth changing the title tags and meta descriptions around or leaving it as is if its already doing well? How much of a difference do title tags and meta descriptions really make? Any insight into this would be great! Thanks

                                          White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | edward-may
                                          1
                                        • Lisa-Devins

                                          Do I lose link juice if I have a https site and someone links to me using http instead?

                                          We have recently launched a https site which is getting some organic links some of which are using https and some are using http. Am I losing link juice on the ones linked using http even though I am redirecting or does Google view them the same way? As most people still use http naturally will it look strange to google if I contact anyone who has given us a link and ask them to change to https?

                                          White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Lisa-Devins
                                          0
                                        • esiow2013

                                          Can I 301 redirect old URLs to staging URLs (ex. staging.newdomain.com) for testing?

                                          I will temporarily remove a few pages from my old website and redirect them to a new domain but in staging domain. Once the redirection is successful, I will remove the redirection rules in my .htaccess and get the removed pages back to live. Thanks in advance!

                                          White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | esiow2013
                                          0
                                        • BonsaiMediaGroup

                                          Can you set up a Google Local account under a PO Box?

                                          I have a client that wants a Google local listing in a town he serves but does not have a physical location.  Is it an issue to share an address with an existing company?  Is is it better to use a P.O. Box? or is there a forwarding address company? Is this considered a black hat Local SEO tactic?

                                          White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | BonsaiMediaGroup
                                          0

                                        Get started with Moz Pro!

                                        Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

                                        Start my free trial
                                        Products
                                        • Moz Pro
                                        • Moz Local
                                        • Moz API
                                        • Moz Data
                                        • STAT
                                        • Product Updates
                                        Moz Solutions
                                        • SMB Solutions
                                        • Agency Solutions
                                        • Enterprise Solutions
                                        • Digital Marketers
                                        Free SEO Tools
                                        • Domain Authority Checker
                                        • Link Explorer
                                        • Keyword Explorer
                                        • Competitive Research
                                        • Brand Authority Checker
                                        • Local Citation Checker
                                        • MozBar Extension
                                        • MozCast
                                        Resources
                                        • Blog
                                        • SEO Learning Center
                                        • Help Hub
                                        • Beginner's Guide to SEO
                                        • How-to Guides
                                        • Moz Academy
                                        • API Docs
                                        About Moz
                                        • About
                                        • Team
                                        • Careers
                                        • Contact
                                        Why Moz
                                        • Case Studies
                                        • Testimonials
                                        Get Involved
                                        • Become an Affiliate
                                        • MozCon
                                        • Webinars
                                        • Practical Marketer Series
                                        • MozPod
                                        Connect with us

                                        Contact the Help team

                                        Join our newsletter
                                        Moz logo
                                        © 2021 - 2025 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
                                        • Accessibility
                                        • Terms of Use
                                        • Privacy

                                        Looks like your connection to Moz was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.