Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Schema Markup for property listings (estate agent)
- 
					
					
					
					
 Hello, I've been looking online for some help with this. An estate agent has a page of properties for sale. Is it possible to mark these individual properties up and if so would they appear as rich snippets in the SERPS - never seen anything like this for properties for sale so just wondered, 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Maslavista, That response is a keeper! I wish there was some way within Moz to create a file of favorites. 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Thank you 
- 
					
					
					
					
 What about this: This is from trulia.com website: 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Thanks but I was meaning the actual properties that they sell? 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Try this http://microdatagenerator.com/realEstateAgency.html and you can read this article https://builtvisible.com/micro-data-schema-org-guide-generating-rich-snippets/ 
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
- 
		
		Moz ToolsChat with the community about the Moz tools. 
- 
		
		SEO TacticsDiscuss the SEO process with fellow marketers 
- 
		
		CommunityDiscuss industry events, jobs, and news! 
- 
		
		Digital MarketingChat about tactics outside of SEO 
- 
		
		Research & TrendsDive into research and trends in the search industry. 
- 
		
		SupportConnect on product support and feature requests. 
Related Questions
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Schema Markup Warning "Missing field "url" (optional)"
 Hello Moz Team, I hope everyone is doing well & good, I need bit help regarding Schema Markup, I am facing issue in my schema markup specifically with my blog posts, In my majority of the posts I find error "Missing field "url" (optional)" Technical SEO | | JoeySolicitor
 As this schema is generated by Yoast plugin, I haven't applied any custom steps. Recently I published a post https://dailycontributors.com/kisscartoon-alternatives-and-complete-review/ and I tested it at two platforms of schema test 1, Validator.Schema.org
 2. Search.google.com/test/rich-results So the validator generate results as follows and shows no error
 Schema without error.PNG It shows no error But where as Schema with error.PNG in search central results it gives me a warning "Missing field "url" (optional)". So is this really be going to issue for my ranking ? Please help thanks!6
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Is there a way to get a list of all pages of your website that are indexed in Google?
 I am trying to put together a comprehensive list of all pages that are indexed in Google and have differing opinions on how to do this. Technical SEO | | SpodekandCo0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Schema markup for Webinars
 I'm looking for a solution to implement schema markup for our webinars. We have an events page that has a list of upcoming events, as well as a list of the webinars we've done with a link to YouTube to watch the webinar. The webinars on our events page have the title and date. What kind of schema markup can we implement for these past events? It is not really an event, but it's not a video either (unless we embed the video on our site). Any tips? (**Also, I would like to use JSON-LD instead of HTML to implement the schema). Thanks! Technical SEO | | laurenpritchett0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		The W3C Markup Validation Service - Good, Bad or Impartial?
 Hi guys, it seems that now days it is almost impossible to achieve 0 (Zero) Errors when testing a site via (The W3C Markup Validation Service - https://validator.w3.org). With analytic codes, pixels and all kind of tracking and social media scripts gunning it seems to be an unachievable task. My questions to you fellow SEO'rs out there are 2: 1. How important and to what degree of effort do you go when you technically review a site and make the decision as to what needs to be fixed and what you shouldn't bother with. 2. How do you argue your corner when explaining to your clients that its impossible to active 100% validation. *As a note i will say that i mostly refer to Wordpress driven sites. would love ot hear your take. Daniel. Technical SEO | | artdivision0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Should a sub domain be a separate property in the Search Console?
 We're launching a blog on a sub-domain of a corp site (blog.corpsite.com). We already have corpsite.com set up in the Search Console. Should I set up a separate property for this sub-domain in the Search Console (WMT) in order to manage it? Is it necessary? Thanks, JM Technical SEO | | HeroDesignStudio0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Where to put Schema On Page
 What part of my page should I put Schema data? Header? Footer? Also All pages? or just home page? Technical SEO | | bozzie3114
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Universal Business Listing?
 Can anyone recommend the best or a better alternative to submitting a clients site to multiple directories than Universal Business Listing? Is UBL the best or is there something better and/or less expensive out there? https://ubl.org Thanks Technical SEO | | fun52dig0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Using Schema.org: Product or Event as the schema type?
 Hello, Most of you heard from the launch of the new format for microdata: Schema.org and my question is about the different types of Schema they provide. Our websites provide an overview of courses, visitors can search/filter training courses and most important: read peer reviews. Until now we formatted (the source) of those courses with the schema type "Product" because it allows us to provide search engines with metadata about reviews via the "Aggregrated Rating". Recently we updated the information about courses, to also provide start dates and locations to users, just like the schema type for: "Events". Because we would like to provide search engines also with both types of data I would like to know your opinion. Schema.org looks like not to support the Aggregated Rating for Events and vice versa for Startdates/Locations for the Product type. And combining the two Schema types also does not looks like an option because we can't put them on the same level like it should be. So what would you recommend to use for kind of schema type(s), are we able to use the 'Product' type next to the 'Event' type and so to combine them? Thanks a lot! Technical SEO | | Martijn_Scheijbeler0
 
			
		 
			
		 
			
		 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				