Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Paginated Pages Which Shouldnt' Exist..
- 
					
					
					
					
 Hi I have paginated pages on a crawl which shouldn't be paginated: https://www.key.co.uk/en/key/chairs My crawl shows: <colgroup><col width="377"></colgroup> 
 | https://www.key.co.uk/en/key/chairs?page=2 |
 | https://www.key.co.uk/en/key/chairs?page=3 |
 | https://www.key.co.uk/en/key/chairs?page=4 |
 | https://www.key.co.uk/en/key/chairs?page=5 |
 | https://www.key.co.uk/en/key/chairs?page=6 |
 | https://www.key.co.uk/en/key/chairs?page=7 |
 | https://www.key.co.uk/en/key/chairs?page=8 |
 | https://www.key.co.uk/en/key/chairs?page=9 |
 | https://www.key.co.uk/en/key/chairs?page=10 |
 | https://www.key.co.uk/en/key/chairs?page=11 |
 | https://www.key.co.uk/en/key/chairs?page=12 |
 | https://www.key.co.uk/en/key/chairs?page=13 |
 | https://www.key.co.uk/en/key/chairs?page=14 |
 | https://www.key.co.uk/en/key/chairs?page=15 |
 | https://www.key.co.uk/en/key/chairs?page=16 |
 | https://www.key.co.uk/en/key/chairs?page=17 |Where is this coming from? Thank you 
- 
					
					
					
					
 You will also have to get those URLs out of the index once you fix the rel next/prev issue. In order to do that effectively, they should return a 404 or 410 status code in the HTTP header so Google knows that they no longer exist (even though they never really did in the first place). Otherwise, it's what is known as a "soft 404" in which the page doesn't really exist, but returns a 200 (OK) status code, which is confusing to Google if you don't want them indexed. 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Hi Becky I can see chairs: https://www.key.co.uk/en/key/chairs But the paginated versions above are not in there. (can you see them?) All you need to do is remove this directive for pages without a page 2: rel="next" href="https://www.key.co.uk/en/key/chairs?page=2" > as there is no page 2 for chairs. Regards Nigel 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Hi Nigel Thanks for jumping in. I'm confused as I have found the pages on my screaming frog crawl? This page https://www.key.co.uk/en/key/chairs shouldn't have any pagination as there are no additional pages, but there is rel=next in the source code... Now I'm a bit confused! Becky 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Yes I've just gone through every top level page too & pagination is awful, so I'm compiling a list and a case to push it. It's pretty bad across the site, so I'll push for this to be updated. I find new issues with it all the time.. Thanks for your help! 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Yes exactly. Even though the pages don't exist to the user, they still technically exist. If I were you, I'd take a very deep look at pagination on your site. If this is happening at scale, then fixing it could be a major improvement to your site. I took a look and it seems to be happening on all your top-level category pages like Chairs, Office Furniture, Shelving & Racking, etc. These paginated pages are essentially a bunch of duplicate pages of your main category pages, each with a self-referencing canonical (which is the proper way to set up pagination). So Google could be extremely confused about which one to rank. In most cases, Google will rank page 1 because the use of rel="next"/rel="prev" is essentially telling Google that page 1 is the canonical version. However, you're still opening yourself up to the possibility of Google crawling all of these duplicate pages which is a huge waste on your crawl budget. Hope that helps! 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Hi Thank you both. We do have issues with our pagination which I've raised with developers, but it's taking forever to sort out. I'll flag this as well. So even though the content on the paginated pages for Chairs doesn't exist we still need to remove the tags on these - https://www.key.co.uk/en/key/chairs?page=10 
- 
					
					
					
					
 If you view your source code, you'll notice you are actually using rel="next" and rel="prev" on the main category page (https://www.key.co.uk/en/key/chairs). This is why you (and most likely Googlebot as well) are crawling these paginated pages. Even though you don't have links to the paginated pages on the main category page, they still exist and you're giving crawlers the directive (rel next / rel prev) to crawl them. If you remove rel="next" on the category home page, that should help but you should really remove rel="next" and rel="prev" on the paginated pages as well. Unless you do that, Google will still find them and crawl them because they're aware these pages exist and they're likely indexed. Here's a great resource on understanding pagination as well as the correct use of rel="next" and rel="prev" from Maile Ohye at Google: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=njn8uXTWiGg Hope this helps! 
 Cheers!
 -Tyler
- 
					
					
					
					
 Nice website by the way. It looks very professional. And your 49 DA is very impressive. 
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
- 
		
		Moz ToolsChat with the community about the Moz tools. 
- 
		
		SEO TacticsDiscuss the SEO process with fellow marketers 
- 
		
		CommunityDiscuss industry events, jobs, and news! 
- 
		
		Digital MarketingChat about tactics outside of SEO 
- 
		
		Research & TrendsDive into research and trends in the search industry. 
- 
		
		SupportConnect on product support and feature requests. 
Related Questions
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Should you 'noindex' Checkout Pages?
 Today I was reviewing my Moz analytics and suddenly noticed 1,000 issues with pages without a meta description. I reviewed the list and learned it is 1,000 checkout pages. That's because my website has thousands of agency pages from which you can buy a product, and it reflects that difference on each version of the checkout. So, I was thinking about no-indexing (but continuing to 'follow') these checkout pages, but wondering if it has any knock-on effects I may be unaware of? Any assistance is much appreciated. Luke Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Luke_Proctor0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Is it ok to repeat a (focus) keyword used on a previous page, on a new page?
 I am cataloguing the pages on our website in terms of which focus keyword has been used with the page. I've noticed that some pages repeated the same keyword / term. I've heard that it's not really good practice, as it's like telling google conflicting information, as the pages with the same keywords will be competing against each other. Is this correct information? If so, is the alternative to use various long-winded keywords instead? If not, meaning it's ok to repeat the keyword on different pages, is there a maximum recommended number of times that we want to repeat the word? Still new-ish to SEO, so any help is much appreciated! V. Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Vitzz1
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Does Google ignore content styled with 'display:none'?
 Do you know if an H1 within a div that has a 'display: none' style applied will still be crawled and evaluated by Google? We have that situation on this page on line 136: view-source:https://www.junk-king.com/services/items-we-take/foreclosure-cleanouts Of course we also have an H1 up at the top of the page and are concerned that the second one will cause interference with our SEO efforts. I've seen conflicting and inconclusive information on line - not sure. Thanks for any help. Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | rastellop0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		What's the best way to noindex pages but still keep backlinks equity?
 Hello everyone, Maybe it is a stupid question, but I ask to the experts... What's the best way to noindex pages but still keep backlinks equity from those noindexed pages? For example, let's say I have many pages that look similar to a "main" page which I solely want to appear on Google, so I want to noindex all pages with the exception of that "main" page... but, what if I also want to transfer any possible link equity present on the noindexed pages to the main page? The only solution I have thought is to add a canonical tag pointing to the main page on those noindexed pages... but will that work or cause wreak havoc in some way? Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | fablau3
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		How long takes to a page show up in Google results after removing noindex from a page?
 Hi folks, A client of mine created a new page and used meta robots noindex to not show the page while they are not ready to launch it. The problem is that somehow Google "crawled" the page and now, after removing the meta robots noindex, the page does not show up in the results. We've tried to crawl it using Fetch as Googlebot, and then submit it using the button that appears. We've included the page in sitemap.xml and also used the old Google submit new page URL https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/submit-url Does anyone know how long will it take for Google to show the page AFTER removing meta robots noindex from the page? Any reliable references of the statement? I did not find any Google video/post about this. I know that in some days it will appear but I'd like to have a good reference for the future. Thanks. Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | fabioricotta-840380
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Is there any negative SEO effect of having comma's in URL's?
 Hello, I have a client who has a large ecommerce website. Some category names have been created with comma's in - which has meant that their software has automatically generated URL's with comma's in for every page that comes beneath the category in the site hierarchy. eg. 1 : http://shop.deliaonline.com/store/music,-dvd-and-games/dvds-and-blu_rays/ eg. 2 : http://shop.deliaonline.com/store/music,-dvd-and-games/dvds-and-blu_rays/action-and-adventure/ etc... I know that URL's with comma's in look a bit ugly! But is there 'any' SEO reason why URL's with comma's in are any less effective? Kind Regs, RB Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | RichBestSEO0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		NOINDEX listing pages: Page 2, Page 3... etc?
 Would it be beneficial to NOINDEX category listing pages except for the first page. For example on this site: http://flyawaysimulation.com/downloads/101/fsx-missions/ Has lots of pages such as Page 2, Page 3, Page 4... etc: http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Aflyawaysimulation.com+fsx+missions Would there be any SEO benefit of NOINDEX on these pages? Of course, FOLLOW is default, so links would still be followed and juice applied. Your thoughts and suggestions are much appreciated. Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Peter2640
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Should the sitemap include just menu pages or all pages site wide?
 I have a Drupal site that utilizes Solr, with 10 menu pages and about 4,000 pages of content. Redoing a few things and we'll need to revamp the sitemap. Typically I'd jam all pages into a single sitemap and that's it, but post-Panda, should I do anything different? Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | EricPacifico0
 
			
		 
			
		 
			
		 
			
		 
			
		 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				