Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Reusing an already 301 redirected URL for a very important keyword
- 
					
					
					
					
 I have a question about reusing an already 301 redirected URL Till now I never reused an URLs that has been already redirected with a 301 redirect. However, I just started working on a website where in past they created a lot of 301 redirects without thinking about the future, and now certain URLs, that are currently redirected with a 301, would be very useful (exact match) and needed (for some of the most important keywords for this specific business), to maintain an optimal, homogeneous and "beautiful" URL structure. Has any of you ever reused a URL that was previously redirected with a 301 redirect? If yes what are your experiences with it? Can content on the reused URL (that was previously 301 redirected and than the redirect removed) normally rank if the page is reestablished and the redirect is removed (and you do great content, on page, internal linking, backlinking, .... ) or is such an URL risky / not recommended / "burned" forever and not recommended to be reused again... especially for very important keywords since it present the exact match ?! Thank you very much for all your help! Regards 
- 
					
					
					
					
 @Tracey_Evans agreed. You should also consider that browsers will cache data for websites they visit @moz46y If a user visits a URL that returns a 301 status code it will remember this. If the user tries to access that redirect URL in the future the browser can just take them to the version that returns a 200 status code (in the name of efficiency). This can be undone, but it requires the user clearing their browser's cache. Not sure if it would be an issue in your use case but it's worthwhile knowing! Cheers, 
 Stefan
- 
					
					
					
					
 @moz46y 
 Reusing a URL that has already been redirected with a 301 redirect is indeed feasible, but it requires careful consideration. When you remove the 301 redirect and re-establish the original URL with new content, search engines like Google need time to re-crawl and re-index this URL. The success of this approach largely depends on the quality and relevance of the new content. If the content is high-quality, relevant to the keyword, and offers a good user experience, there's a good chance that the URL can regain its ranking potential. It's important to focus on on-page SEO, internal linking, and backlinking to aid in quicker re-indexing and potentially restore the URL’s authority.However, there are risks involved. The URL may not regain its previous ranking quickly, especially for competitive keywords. The history of redirects might cause search engines to take more time to trust the URL again. Therefore, it's crucial to monitor its performance closely using tools like Google Search Console to track changes in ranking and traffic. If the URL is crucial for very important keywords and you're concerned about potential risks, you might consider creating a new, similarly optimized URL as a safer alternative. In summary, while reusing a previously 301 redirected URL is possible and can be successful, it's a strategy that requires a strategic approach, careful implementation, and continuous monitoring. 
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
- 
		
		Moz ToolsChat with the community about the Moz tools. 
- 
		
		SEO TacticsDiscuss the SEO process with fellow marketers 
- 
		
		CommunityDiscuss industry events, jobs, and news! 
- 
		
		Digital MarketingChat about tactics outside of SEO 
- 
		
		Research & TrendsDive into research and trends in the search industry. 
- 
		
		SupportConnect on product support and feature requests. 
Related Questions
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Best redirect destination for 18k highly-linked pages
 Technical SEO question regarding redirects; I appreciate any insights on best way to handle. Situation: We're decommissioning several major content sections on a website, comprising ~18k webpages. This is a well established site (10+ years) and many of the pages within these sections have high-quality inbound links from .orgs and .edus. Challenge: We're trying to determine the best place to redirect these 18k pages. For user experience, we believe best option is the homepage, which has a statement about the changes to the site and links to the most important remaining sections of the site. It's also the most important page on site, so the bolster of 301 redirected links doesn't seem bad. However, someone on our team is concerned that that many new redirected pages and links going to our homepage will trigger a negative SEO flag for the homepage, and recommends instead that they all go to our custom 404 page (which also includes links to important remaining sections). What's the right approach here to preserve remaining SEO value of these soon-to-be-redirected pages without triggering Google penalties? Technical SEO | | davidvogel1
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Is domain forwarding the same as a 301 redirect?
 Hi, I have an older domain with some SEO auth for varying pages and a newer domain that is for the brand. Right now there are some 301s for about 13 pages and we are currently moving servers. I was wondering if domain forwarding is the same as writing 301 redirects for each page or is it something different (302)? SEO Tactics | | BrandonDebison0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Multilang site: Auto redirect 301 or 302?
 We need to establish if 301 or 302 response code is to be used for our auto redirects based on Accept-Language header. https://domain.com International SEO | | fJ66doneOIdDpj
 30x > https://domain.com/en
 30x > https://domain.com/ru
 30x > https://domain.com/de The site architecture is set up with proper inline HREFLANG.
 We have read different opinions about this, Ahrefs says 302 is the correct one:
 https://ahrefs.com/blog/301-vs-302-redirects/
 302 redirect:
 "You want to redirect users to the right version of the site for them (based on location/language)." You could argue that the root redirect is never permanent as it varies based on user language settings (302)
 On the other hand, the lang specific redirects are permanent per language: IF Accept-Language header = en
 https://domain.com > 301 > https://domain.com/en
 IF Accept-Language header = ru
 https://domain.com > 301 > https://domain.com/ru So each of these is 'permanent'. So which is the correct?0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Is 301 redirect the only way when using Vanity URLs?
 We have been using vanity urls for some of our pages. Mostly the pages that have a vanity URL have a long URL length. But now the problem is, the vanity URL is getting displayed on the search engine when the particular keyword related to the page is entered. I checked the google search console, the vanity URL is indexed and the original URL remains unindexed. What should I do? Is adding 301 redirect to the vanity URLs are solution? Since some of vanity URLs are not redirecting to the original. Some of the original pages are not getting traffic. Also, can using canonical tag help? Technical SEO | | tejasbansode0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		301 redirect from Blogger
 Hello, I have a client with a Wordpress network of blogs, each blog is owned by a different blogger. Many of them were migrated time ago from Blogger. I have seen that the way used to redirect them is a meta refresh, so no authority is being passed. I cannot find any reliable way of making a 301 from Blogger, There are some plugins, but I'm afraid of using them. Any of you have experience with this situation please? I have even thought about placing a global rel canonical before the meta refresh, but I think that here the problem is the meta refresh itself.... Thank you in advance Technical SEO | | Juandbbam0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Loss of search engine positions after 301 redirect - what went wrong?!?
 Hi Guys After adhering to the On Page optimisation suggestions given by SEOmoz, we redirected some of old urls to new ones. We set 301 redirects from the old pages to new on a page by page basis but our search engine ranking subsequently fell off the radar and lost PR. We confirmed redirection with fiddler and it shows 301 permanent redirect on every page as expected. To manage redirection using a common code logic we executed following: In Http module, using “rewrite path” we route “all old page requests” to a page called “redirect.aspx? oldpagename =[oldpagename]”. This happens at server side. In redirect.aspx we are redirecting from old page to new page using 301 permanent redirect. In the browser, when old page is requested, it will 301 redirect to new page. In hope we and others can learn from our mistakes - what did we do wrong ?!? Thanks in advance. Dave - www.paysubsonline.com Technical SEO | | Evo0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		301 Redirect with an Exact Domain name Match
 My Client had a site that ranked for a pretty competitive two word phrase, but for a variety of reasons had to transfer the site to a different domain name (with none of the previous keywords). We've 301'd everything just fine to the new site, but our traffic for that two word phrase, as well as related long tail traffic, is beginning to drop. Could the drop be related to something that we didn't do well in the transfer? Or is it due to the new domain name now not being an exact match? Sitenote question: Our Google Analytics is still set up for the former domain name and shows data just fine. Is there any reason to switch GA to the new domain? What are the pros/cons? Much thanks in advance! Technical SEO | | TrevorMcKendrick0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		How long will Google take to stop crawling an old URL once it has been 301 redirected
 I need to do a clean-up old urls that have been redirected in sitemap and was wondering about this. Technical SEO | | Ant-8080
 
			
		 
				
		 
			
		 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				