Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
"the plural seems to un-natural to fit in the content, or title"
In that case, I wouldn't use it. I can't speak for Portugese, but in English, in the last 2 or more years I can't remember any cases I've had where Google doesn't recognise the difference between plural and non-plural anyway.
What happens when you search for the keyword in plural? Do non-plural results show up? And vice-versa? Trying that out should help.
Even if you search on google.com? Have you tried other countries like google.fr? If google.com is redirecting to the Netherlands' version visiting www.google.com/ncr should stop it.
This works on any localised version of Google (at least those I've tried!). So you can go to google.de and enter Berlin as the location, google.co.uk and enter London etc.
For Facebook your answer is here: https://www.facebook.com/help/131671940241729
You can get some idea of organic image traffic if you use Google Analytics:
Acquisition > All Referrals > click on google and look at /imgres. If you want to see where the traffic is going to (to get an idea of which images) click /imgres and on the Secondary dimension dropdown go to Behaviour > Landing Page.
If it's as simple as redirecting using the same slugs (hence one global redirect rule) then I would redirect the images. If it's complicated then I might not bother, depending on whether image search leads to many visits and conversions to your site or not. Usually image traffic doesn't convert well. If you're migrating to a new domain and keeping the same folder structure it should be as easy as doing one global redirect?
Rather than redirecting I'd most likely take the opportunity to make the filenames of images more friendly than ce7aeffb1e5bdfc8d4288885c52de8e3.jpg by using short descriptive filenames.
Wikipedia editors often delete pages about individuals or businesses if they deem that the individual or business isn't notable enough to have their own page. So in most cases probably not a good idea.
I agree with EGOL.
Another problem with Wikipedia is that you don't have control over the content - anyone can edit a page.
Maybe one day your company will become well-known enough for someone to independently create a Wikipedia page about the company. At that point Wikipedia might be less likely to outrank your own site!