Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Should we use "and" or "&"?
- 
					
					
					
					
 Our client has an ampersand in their brand name. The logo has "&", their url is spelled out. I'm trying to get them to standardize the use of the name for directories/listings. Should we use "and" or "&"? 
- 
					
					
					
					
 I'd go for &. I optimized a page for "Canada & New England Cruises" some years back. The results were: canada and new england cruises = 24th of 6,300,000 results canada & new england cruises = 32nd of 7,660,000 results This indicates to me that Google probably knows the difference. 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Greetings VernonMack, Thanks for coming to Q&A with your question. I'm the Local SEO Associate here in the forum. Your question is a good one and, happily, the answer here is simple. You need to use whatever your legal business name is. If your DBA uses ampersand, then consistently use this to describe your business on your website, local listings and elsewhere. If it uses and, then use that. Be consistent and you will be fine. 
- 
					
					
					
					
 and = & (much of a muchness really) I'd go with "&" i the directories if that's what's in the logo so consumers get familiar / see consistency with the brand - also it's shorter  
- 
					
					
					
					
 Use at&t or at t (including spacing). Let's refer to the At&t example If you use "&" google will still read it as att or at&t however if you include "and" then this becomes a totally different term. So try with spacing or & Hope this helps, Vahe 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Hi Woj. Thanks for the reply. Looks like my first question was unclear. URL is already established. Please see clarification note to Francisco above. 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Thanks, Francisco. I need to use one or the other. i.e. "Heating & Air" or "Heating and Air" because HeatingAir would not be right. To clarify, I am trying to determine the best way to add the client's NAME (not url) to listings/directories. I was just noting that the url is already ...heatingandair.com. 
- 
					
					
					
					
 The "&" character is typically reserved for the querystring portion of the URL I'd avoid using "and" or "&" in url's except for in the TLD if it's critical for the brand Also, another tip.. if you use "and", make sure it doesn't get confused with the surrounding words, e.g. - camelandhorse.com may be read as "came land horse" or "camel and horse"
 (sorry, no real-word example came mind lol - except for the old expertsexchange.com URL) 
- 
					
					
					
					
 I would probably use AT&T's example (ATT). I believe Matt Cutts said the & is looked at as a character. I tried going straight to at&t.com and it sent me to a SERP. Using the word "and" in the domain sounds weird to me. 
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
- 
		
		Moz ToolsChat with the community about the Moz tools. 
- 
		
		SEO TacticsDiscuss the SEO process with fellow marketers 
- 
		
		CommunityDiscuss industry events, jobs, and news! 
- 
		
		Digital MarketingChat about tactics outside of SEO 
- 
		
		Research & TrendsDive into research and trends in the search industry. 
- 
		
		SupportConnect on product support and feature requests. 
Related Questions
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Sudden Indexation of "Index of /wp-content/uploads/"
 Hi all, I have suddenly noticed a massive jump in indexed pages. After performing a "site:" search, it was revealed that the sudden jump was due to the indexation of many pages beginning with the serp title "Index of /wp-content/uploads/" for many uploaded pieces of content & plugins. This has appeared approximately one month after switching to https. I have also noticed a decline in Bing rankings. Does anyone know what is causing/how to fix this? To be clear, these pages are **not **normal /wp-content/uploads/ but rather "index of" pages, being included in Google. Thank you. Technical SEO | | Tom3_150
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		"Noindex, follow" for thin pages?
 Hey there Mozzers, I have a question regarding Thin pages. Unfortunately, we have Thin pages, almost empty to be honest. I have the idea to ask the dev team to do "noindex, follow" on these pages. What do you think? Has someone faced this situation before? Will appreciate your input! Technical SEO | | Europarl_SEO_Team0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Link rel="prev" AND canonical
 Hi guys, When you have several tabs on your website with products, you can most likely navigate to page 2, 3, 4 etc... Technical SEO | | AdenaSEO
 You can add the link rel="prev" and link rel="next" tags to make sure that 1 page get's indexed / ranked by Google. am I correct? However this still means that all the pages can get indexed, right? For example a webshop makes use of the link rel="prev" and ="next" tags. In the Google results page though, all the seperate tabs pages are still visible/indexed..
 http://www.domain.nl/watches/?tab=1
 http://www.domain.nl/watches/?tab=24
 http://www.domain.nl/watches/?tab=19
 etc..... Can we prevent this, and make sure only the main page get's indexed and ranked, by adding a canonical link on every 'tab page' to the main page --> www.domain.nl/watches/ I hope I explained it well and I'm looking forward to hearing from you. Regards, Tom1
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		What is the difference between "Referring Pages" and "Total Backlinks" [on Ahrefs]?
 I always thought they were essentially the same thing myself but appears there may be a difference? Any one care to help me out? Cheers! Technical SEO | | Webrevolve0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Staging site and "live" site have both been indexed by Google
 While creating a site we forgot to password protect the staging site while it was being built. Now that the site has been moved to the new domain, it has come to my attention that both the staging site (site.staging.com) and the "live" site (site.com) are both being indexed. What is the best way to solve this problem? I was thinking about adding a 301 redirect from the staging site to the live site via HTACCESS. Any recommendations? Technical SEO | | melen0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Wordpress "incoming search terms" plugin
 Hello everyone! newbie to SEO and have been trying to keep everything nice and ethical but I've seen on a couple of blogs today "incoming search terms" at the bottom of the blogs, then a bullet pointed list of search terms beneath it. So I had a quick search about the use of it and noticed wordpress has a plugin that automatic ally generates these "incoming search terms". I ask is this a legitimate plugin or will this harm my blog? I assume it generally will as I can't see this being much use for the audience, rather it would be 100% for trying to lure in search engines. Technical SEO | | acecream0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Iframes & SEO
 I've got a client that wants a site with all content in iFrames. They saw another site they liked & asked if we could do it. Of course we can technically. How big a negative hit would they take with SEO? Is there anything we can do to mitigate it, such as redirects, etc? Thanks for the help! Technical SEO | | wcksmith0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Is using a Href in Div OK?
 Hi, I was just wondering what your thoughts are on using a Href in a Div, which contains anchor text. We currently use the Href on the div, as opposed to just the anchor text as I want the whole div to be clickable as opposed to just the anchor text. So currently I have: Keword 1 Technical SEO | | James77
 Keyword 2 Is this perfectly fine to do it like this as opposed to using <a tags="" ???<br="">I suppose there are various alternatives - if you must use the</a><a tag="" like:<="" p=""></a> <a tag="" like:<="" p=""></a> Keword 1
 Keyword 2 However I would assume a search engine is smart enought to know its the same thing??? Thanks0
 
			
		 
			
		 
			
		 
			
		 
			
		 
			
		 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				