• seohunters9

        See all notifications

        Skip to content
        Moz logo Menu open Menu close
        • Products
          • Moz Pro
          • Moz Pro Home
          • Moz Local
          • Moz Local Home
          • STAT
          • Moz API
          • Moz API Home
          • Compare SEO Products
          • Moz Data
        • Free SEO Tools
          • Domain Analysis
          • Keyword Explorer
          • Link Explorer
          • Competitive Research
          • MozBar
          • More Free SEO Tools
        • Learn SEO
          • Beginner's Guide to SEO
          • SEO Learning Center
          • Moz Academy
          • MozCon
          • Webinars, Whitepapers, & Guides
        • Blog
        • Why Moz
          • Digital Marketers
          • Agency Solutions
          • Enterprise Solutions
          • Small Business Solutions
          • The Moz Story
          • New Releases
        • Log in
        • Log out
        • Products
          • Moz Pro

            Your all-in-one suite of SEO essentials.

          • Moz Local

            Raise your local SEO visibility with complete local SEO management.

          • STAT

            SERP tracking and analytics for enterprise SEO experts.

          • Moz API

            Power your SEO with our index of over 44 trillion links.

          • Compare SEO Products

            See which Moz SEO solution best meets your business needs.

          • Moz Data

            Power your SEO strategy & AI models with custom data solutions.

          Let your business shine with Listings AI
          Moz Local

          Let your business shine with Listings AI

          Learn more
        • Free SEO Tools
          • Domain Analysis

            Get top competitive SEO metrics like DA, top pages and more.

          • Keyword Explorer

            Find traffic-driving keywords with our 1.25 billion+ keyword index.

          • Link Explorer

            Explore over 40 trillion links for powerful backlink data.

          • Competitive Research

            Uncover valuable insights on your organic search competitors.

          • MozBar

            See top SEO metrics for free as you browse the web.

          • More Free SEO Tools

            Explore all the free SEO tools Moz has to offer.

          NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic
          Moz Pro

          NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic

          Learn more
        • Learn SEO
          • Beginner's Guide to SEO

            The #1 most popular introduction to SEO, trusted by millions.

          • SEO Learning Center

            Broaden your knowledge with SEO resources for all skill levels.

          • On-Demand Webinars

            Learn modern SEO best practices from industry experts.

          • How-To Guides

            Step-by-step guides to search success from the authority on SEO.

          • Moz Academy

            Upskill and get certified with on-demand courses & certifications.

          • MozCon

            Save on Early Bird tickets and join us in London or New York City

          Unlock flexible pricing & new endpoints
          Moz API

          Unlock flexible pricing & new endpoints

          Find your plan
        • Blog
        • Why Moz
          • Digital Marketers

            Simplify SEO tasks to save time and grow your traffic.

          • Small Business Solutions

            Uncover insights to make smarter marketing decisions in less time.

          • Agency Solutions

            Earn & keep valuable clients with unparalleled data & insights.

          • Enterprise Solutions

            Gain a competitive edge in the ever-changing world of search.

          • The Moz Story

            Moz was the first & remains the most trusted SEO company.

          • New Releases

            Get the scoop on the latest and greatest from Moz.

          Surface actionable competitive intel
          New Feature

          Surface actionable competitive intel

          Learn More
        • Log in
          • Moz Pro
          • Moz Local
          • Moz Local Dashboard
          • Moz API
          • Moz API Dashboard
          • Moz Academy
        • Avatar
          • Moz Home
          • Notifications
          • Account & Billing
          • Manage Users
          • Community Profile
          • My Q&A
          • My Videos
          • Log Out

        The Moz Q&A Forum

        • Forum
        • Questions
        • My Q&A
        • Users
        • Ask the Community

        Welcome to the Q&A Forum

        Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

        1. Home
        2. SEO Tactics
        3. Intermediate & Advanced SEO
        4. Should I use rel=canonical on similar product pages.

        Moz Q&A is closed.

        After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.

        Should I use rel=canonical on similar product pages.

        Intermediate & Advanced SEO
        8
        23
        4009
        Loading More Posts
        • Watching

          Notify me of new replies.
          Show question in unread.

        • Not Watching

          Do not notify me of new replies.
          Show question in unread if category is not ignored.

        • Ignoring

          Do not notify me of new replies.
          Do not show question in unread.

        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes
        Reply
        • Reply as question
        Locked
        This topic has been deleted. Only users with question management privileges can see it.
        • mark_baird
          mark_baird last edited by

          I'm thinking of using rel=canonical for similar products on my site.

          Say I'm selling pens and they are al very similar. I.e. a big pen in blue, a pack of 5 blue bic pens, a pack of 10, 50, 100 etc. should I rel=canonical them all to the best seller as its almost impossible to make the pages unique. (I realise the best I realise these should be attributes and not products but I'm sure you get my point)

          It seems sensible to have one master canonical page for bic pens on a site that has a great description video content and good images plus linked articles etc rather than loads of duplicate looking pages.

          love to hear thoughts from the Moz community.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Dr-Pete
            Dr-Pete Staff @BlairKuhnen last edited by

            There's no perfect solution, but Google's advice is to use rel=prev/next. This looks like pretty classic pagination. Rel-canonical is a stronger signal, but it's generally going to keep pages 2+ from ranking.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • BlairKuhnen
              BlairKuhnen @Dr-Pete last edited by

              Dr. Pete,

              I have a internal debate going and I was hoping you might be a tie breaker on rel=canonical vs noindex given these paginated pages and might be a good use case for others:

              https://www.newhomesource.com/communityresults/market-269/citynamefilter-cedar-park

              https://www.newhomesource.com/communityresults/market-269/citynamefilter-cedar-park/page-2

              The individual list items are unique, but clearly want to rank for essentially the exact same terms.  Page titles, metas, copy about cit is the same.  Just the list elements are different, but not a 12 pack of pens, 24 pack etc.  Is this tricky or clear?

              Dr-Pete 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Mark-Tillison
                Mark-Tillison @Dr-Pete last edited by

                Thank you Sir. I think we reached the same conclusion.

                By the way, the it was a just a simple example of the page hierarchy - we're not doing Horror Books 😉

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Dr-Pete
                  Dr-Pete Staff @Mark-Tillison last edited by

                  I haven't heard any SEO recommendations or benefits regarding rel="contents". Rel=prev/next has mixed results, but I'd generally only use it for its specific use case of paginated content.

                  I guess you could treat V2 as "pages" within V1. If you did that, what you'd need to do is treat the main page as a "View All" page and link to it from each author page. I'm not sure if that's the best approach, but it's more or less Google-approved.

                  If the site has decent authority and we're only talking 100s of pages, I might let them all live in the index and see what happens. Let Google sort it out, and then decide if you're ok with the outcome. If the site is low authority and/or we're talking 1000s of pages, I might be more cautious.

                  It's hard to speak in generalities - it depends a lot on the quality of the site and nature of the pages, including how much that content is available/duplicated across the web. One problem here is that author pages with lists of books probably exist on many sites, so you have to differentiate yourself.

                  Mark-Tillison 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • Mark-Tillison
                    Mark-Tillison @Dr-Pete last edited by

                    Good. Same page 🙂

                    I was looking in to rel=contents and those variations before, but I can't quite decide whether this is worth the effort or not.

                    e.g. There's a huge list of resources on a single page, segmented in to categories. The page is HUGE and takes ages to load, so I've been creating new pages for each segment and optimising those pages independently, but there is some common content with the primary page.

                    V1: Horror Novels page has a section for each author, each section lists all novels by that author.

                    V2: Each Author has a page which lists novels by that author, but links back to the Horror Novels page which is essentially an index of the Author pages. Would you also

                    Would you use rel=contents, rel=prev/next or a different approach in this case? From what I've read so far, there doesn't seem any "SEO value" in linking that way.

                    I guess we're trying to improve the UX through faster load times and segmenting the information in smaller chunks, but also presenting a number of pages to Google as a body of content rather than a single page without causing issues with duplicate or similar content - we just need to make sure that we're optimising it in the right way, of course.

                    Dr-Pete 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Dr-Pete
                      Dr-Pete Staff @Mark-Tillison last edited by

                      I would Meta Noindex an "email this page" template. It has no value for SERPs, it's generally at the end of a path, and no one is going to link to it. Just keep it out of the index altogether.

                      Mark-Tillison 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Mark-Tillison
                        Mark-Tillison @Dr-Pete last edited by

                        Thanks Pete

                        So, for a more specific example, if an eCommerce store has an "email this product" page for each product (Magento seems to love doing this and creates a duplicate of the same email page for every product), would you recommend a canonical link for each of those pages to the main Contact page or canonically linking each page to each related product page?

                        From setup, I'd consider NoIndex on all of those pages anyway, but it's a bit late for that once a site has been live for years.

                        The email pages are obviously related to the product page, but the content there isn't anywhere near identical.

                        Or maybe there's a "more appropriate solution" that you alluded to? 😉

                        Dr-Pete 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • Dr-Pete
                          Dr-Pete Staff last edited by

                          To clarify, that's the official stance - rel=canonical should only be used on true duplicates (basically, URL variants of the same page). In practice, rel=canonical works perfectly well on near-duplicates, and sometimes even on wildly different pages, but the more different you get, the more caution you should exercise. If the pages are wildly different, it's likely there are more appropriate solutions.

                          Mark-Tillison BlairKuhnen 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • Mark-Tillison
                            Mark-Tillison @Dr-Pete last edited by

                            Hey Pete

                            Can you explain, "you can't use rel=canonical on pages that aren't 100% duplicates" a little further please?

                            Do you mean that only duplicate pages should be canonicalised? Identical pages in two different sub-directories is fine, but two similar pages is not?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • Dr-Pete
                              Dr-Pete Staff last edited by

                              So, here's the problem - if you follow the official uses of our options, then there is no answer. You can't have thin content or Google will slap you with Panda (or, at the very least, devalue your rankings, you can't use rel=canonical on pages that aren't 100% duplicates, and you're not supposed to (according to Google) just NOINDEX content. The official advice is: "Let us sort it out, but if we don't sort it out, we'll smack you down."

                              I don't mean that to be critical of your comment, but I'm very frustrated with the official party line from Google. Practically speaking, I've found index control to be extremely effective even before Panda, and critical for big sites post-Panda. Sometimes, that means embracing imperfect solutions. The right tool for any situation can be complex (and it may be a combination of tools), but rel=canonical is powerful and often effective, in my experience.

                              Mark-Tillison 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                              • mark_baird
                                mark_baird @Dr-Pete last edited by

                                It seems to me that for most ecommerce sites (myself included) that canonical is not the answer. If you have to many near identical products on your site it may be better to re evaluate what you have stocking and if you must stock them then the way forward is to make one page that properly explains them and allows purchase rather than many.

                                The only uses I can see for canonical is to consolidate old blogs and articles on similar topics. Using it to tidy an ecommerce site seems to be a misuse of the tool.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • Dr-Pete
                                  Dr-Pete Staff last edited by

                                  This can get tricky when you dive into the details, but I general agree with Takeshi and EGOL - consolidate or canonicalize. If the products are different brands/versions of a similar item, it's a bit trickier, but these variations do have a way of spinning out of control. In 2013, I think the down side of your index running wild is a lot higher than the up side of ranking for a couple more long-tail terms. It does depend a lot on your traffic, business model, etc., though. I'm not sure any of us can adequately advise you in the scope of a Q&A.

                                  mark_baird 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • PremioOscar
                                    PremioOscar last edited by

                                    Also I forgot to mention that in this way you also don't have to worry about creating tons of different product descriptions because you will put one description for, let's say, 6 different products.

                                    the way we built it, allow us to have just product group pages are reachable; the products pages are indexed and crawled and they have to be there otherwise the whole system wouldn't work, but no optimization is done on them and customers can't see it.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • PremioOscar
                                      PremioOscar last edited by

                                      Hello there,

                                      I manage an e-commerce site and because we have similar products and issues with duplicate content we have implemented product groups pages with a drop-down menu' listing the different options for a particular product and then we have used the rel="canonical" with the different product pages. In this way we have solved this issue and it works very well.

                                      If you do implement it, make sure every passage is done correctly otherwise, as Matt Cutts says, you will have an headache trying to sort it out.

                                      Hope it helps

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • EGOL
                                        EGOL last edited by

                                        Those pen offers are very very similar.  Identical product descriptions except for perhaps number being sold or color or width of the tip.

                                        If these were on my site they would all be on the same page.  One page to concentrate/conserve the linkjuice.  One page to make thicker content.   One page to present all of the options to the customer at same time.  (PITA to click between lots of pages to make up your mind as a shopper).   One page to make maintenance easy.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • mark_baird
                                          mark_baird last edited by

                                          Thanks

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • TakeshiYoung
                                            TakeshiYoung @mark_baird last edited by

                                            Yes, I've used this approach for a number of ecommerce clients, and it is very effective. There are many advantages to this approach:

                                            • Eliminating duplicate/thin content across the site
                                            • Focusing link value on a single page instead of spreading out across multiple products
                                            • Less effort creating unique content (one page vs multiple)
                                            • Potentially better user experience

                                            Of course, if you have the resources to write unique content for each of your product pages, that is going to be a better solution. You can still create a landing page in this instance, you just wouldn't canonical the product pages to it.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                            • mark_baird
                                              mark_baird last edited by

                                              Have you used this approach? If so how effective is it?

                                              TakeshiYoung 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                              • TakeshiYoung
                                                TakeshiYoung last edited by

                                                If you want to rank for "flat head screw driver", the canonical approach can still work. Simply create a landing page for flat head screw drivers, and include all of the flat head screwdriver products from each of the different brands. Then canonical each of the individual product pages up to the main landing page.

                                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                                • mark_baird
                                                  mark_baird @TakeshiYoung last edited by

                                                  I have all the usual colour size attributes on my products. I just used that as a simple example. Its more to do with similar non branded products that are different enough to be "products" but not when I have 15 similar it's impossible to write fully different descriptions. Screwdrivers, screws or paint would have been a better example. There are hundreds of ranges like that. If you had five unimportant brands of screwdriver and you had flat head and philips head. Each one is marginally different (handle style etc) but there is no keyword benefit to having each optimised for say "flat head screwdriver". Having a good range is beneficial to the customer but seems to be detrimental to SEO. Is it better to employ writers to make every description different no matter how complex or should I canonical it?

                                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                                  • TakeshiYoung
                                                    TakeshiYoung last edited by

                                                    Yes, that is a good solution, especially in this post-Panda world. Ideally you would just have one page for Bic pens, with a drop down from which you can select different options such as colors & size. If your shopping cart system doesn't allow you to do that, then the canonical is a good approach. This cuts down on the amount of duplicate content you have and the amount of unique content you need to create.

                                                    mark_baird 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                                    • OlegKorneitchouk
                                                      OlegKorneitchouk last edited by

                                                      Have a client in the exact same situation. Check to see if you are currently getting traffic for terms that would be specific to having separate pages (e.g. "50 blue bic pens" versus a more general "bic blue pens"). If you don't, then you should canonical to one page. If you do, I'd keep it as is and work on diversifying the product pages more.

                                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                                      • 1 / 1
                                                      • First post
                                                        Last post

                                                      Browse Questions

                                                      Explore more categories

                                                      • Moz Tools

                                                        Chat with the community about the Moz tools.

                                                      • SEO Tactics

                                                        Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers

                                                      • Community

                                                        Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!

                                                      • Digital Marketing

                                                        Chat about tactics outside of SEO

                                                      • Research & Trends

                                                        Dive into research and trends in the search industry.

                                                      • Support

                                                        Connect on product support and feature requests.

                                                      • See all categories

                                                      Related Questions

                                                      • Vitzz

                                                        Is it ok to repeat a (focus) keyword used on a previous page, on a new page?

                                                        I am cataloguing the pages on our website in terms of which focus keyword has been used with the page. I've noticed that some pages repeated the same keyword / term. I've heard that it's not really good practice, as it's like telling google conflicting information, as the pages with the same keywords will be competing against each other. Is this correct information? If so, is the alternative to use various long-winded keywords instead? If not, meaning it's ok to repeat the keyword on different pages, is there a maximum recommended number of times that we want to repeat the word? Still new-ish to SEO, so any help is much appreciated! V.

                                                        Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Vitzz
                                                        1
                                                      • india-morocco

                                                        Move to new domain using Canonical Tag

                                                        At the moment, I am moving from olddomain.com (niche site) to the newdomain.com (multi-niche site). Due to some reasons, I do not want to use 301 right now and planning to use the canonical pointing to the new domain instead. Would Google rank the new site instead of the old site? From what I have learnt, the canonical tag lets Google know that which is the main source of the contents. Thank you very much!

                                                        Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | india-morocco
                                                        0
                                                      • BeckyKey

                                                        Ecommerce Site - Duplicate product descriptions & SKU pages

                                                        Hi I have a couple of questions regarding the best way to optimise SKU pages on a large ecommerce site. At the moment we have 2 landing pages per product - one is the primary landing page with no SKU, the other includes the SKU in the URL so our sales people & customers can find it when using the search facility on the site. The SKU landing page has a canonical pointing to the primary page as they're duplicates. Is this the best way? Or is it better to have the one page with the SKU in the URL? Also, we have loads of products with the very similar product descriptions, I am working on trying to include a unique paragraph or few sentences on these to improve the content - how dangerous is the duplicate content within your own site? I know its best to have totally unique content, but it won't be possible on a site with thousands of products and a small team. At the moment I am trying to prioritise the products to update. Thank you 🙂

                                                        Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BeckyKey
                                                        0
                                                      • BrandExpSteve

                                                        Is their value in linking to PPC landing pages and using rel="canonical"

                                                        I have ppc landing pages that are similar to my seo page. The pages are shorter with less text with a focus on converting visitors further along in the purchase cycle. My questions are: 1. Is there a benefit for having the orphan ppc pages indexed or should I no index them? 2. If indexing does provide benefits, should I create links from my site to the ppc pages or should I just submit them in a sitemap? 3. If indexed, should I use rel="canonical" and point the ppc versions to the appropriate organic page? Thanks,

                                                        Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BrandExpSteve
                                                        0
                                                      • RG_SEO

                                                        Best practice for retiring old product pages

                                                        We’re a software company. Would someone be able to help me with a basic process for retiring old product pages and re-directing the SEO value to new pages. We are retiring some old products to focus on new products. The new software has much similar functionality to the old software, but has more features. How can we ensure that the new pages get the best start in life? Also, what is the best way of doing this for users? Our plan currently is to: Leave the old pages up initially with a message to the user that the old software has been retired. There will also be a message explaining that the user might be interested in one of our new products and a link to the new pages. When traffic to these pages reduces, then we will delete these pages and re-direct them to the homepage. Has anyone got any recommendations for how we could approach this differently? One idea that I’m considering is to immediately re-direct the old product pages to the new pages. I was wondering if we could then provide a message to the user explaining that the old product has been retired but that the new improved product is available. I’d also be interested in pointing the re-directs to the new product pages that are most relevant rather than the homepage, so that they get the value of the old links. I’ve found in the past that old retirement pages for products can outrank the new pages as until you 301 them then all the links and authority flow to these pages. Any help would be very much appreciated 🙂

                                                        Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | RG_SEO
                                                        0
                                                      • gregelwell

                                                        Could you use a robots.txt file to disalow a duplicate content page from being crawled?

                                                        A website has duplicate content pages to make it easier for users to find the information from a couple spots in the site navigation. Site owner would like to keep it this way without hurting SEO. I've thought of using the robots.txt file to disallow search engines from crawling one of the pages. Would you think this is a workable/acceptable solution?

                                                        Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | gregelwell
                                                        0
                                                      • mhans

                                                        Any penalty for having rel=canonical tags on every page?

                                                        For some reason every webpage of our website (www.nathosp.com)  has a rel=canonical tag. I'm not sure why the previous SEO manager did this, but we don't have any duplicate content that would require a canonical tag. Should I remove these tags? And if so, what's the advantage - or disadvantage of leaving them in place? Thank you in advance for your help. -Josh Fulfer

                                                        Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | mhans
                                                        1
                                                      • donthe

                                                        Paging. is it better to use noindex, follow

                                                        Is it better to use the robots meta noindex, follow tag for paging, (page 2, page 3) of Category Pages which lists items within each category or just let Google index these pages Before Panda I was not using noindex because I figured if page 2 is in Google's index then the items on page 2 are more likely to be in Google's index. Also then each item has an internal link So after I got hit by panda, I'm thinking well page 2 has no unique content only a list of links with a short excerpt from each item which can be found on each items page so it's not unique content, maybe that contributed to Panda penalty. So I place the meta tag noindex, follow on every page 2,3 for each category page. Page 1 of each category page has a short introduction so i hope that it is enough to make it "thick" content (is that a word :-))  My visitors don't want long introductions, it hurts bounce rate and time on site. Now I'm wondering if that is common practice and if items on page 2 are less likely to be indexed since they have no internal links from an indexed page Thanks!

                                                        Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | donthe
                                                        0

                                                      Get started with Moz Pro!

                                                      Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

                                                      Start my free trial
                                                      Products
                                                      • Moz Pro
                                                      • Moz Local
                                                      • Moz API
                                                      • Moz Data
                                                      • STAT
                                                      • Product Updates
                                                      Moz Solutions
                                                      • SMB Solutions
                                                      • Agency Solutions
                                                      • Enterprise Solutions
                                                      • Digital Marketers
                                                      Free SEO Tools
                                                      • Domain Authority Checker
                                                      • Link Explorer
                                                      • Keyword Explorer
                                                      • Competitive Research
                                                      • Brand Authority Checker
                                                      • Local Citation Checker
                                                      • MozBar Extension
                                                      • MozCast
                                                      Resources
                                                      • Blog
                                                      • SEO Learning Center
                                                      • Help Hub
                                                      • Beginner's Guide to SEO
                                                      • How-to Guides
                                                      • Moz Academy
                                                      • API Docs
                                                      About Moz
                                                      • About
                                                      • Team
                                                      • Careers
                                                      • Contact
                                                      Why Moz
                                                      • Case Studies
                                                      • Testimonials
                                                      Get Involved
                                                      • Become an Affiliate
                                                      • MozCon
                                                      • Webinars
                                                      • Practical Marketer Series
                                                      • MozPod
                                                      Connect with us

                                                      Contact the Help team

                                                      Join our newsletter
                                                      Moz logo
                                                      © 2021 - 2025 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
                                                      • Accessibility
                                                      • Terms of Use
                                                      • Privacy

                                                      Looks like your connection to Moz was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.