• majorAlexa

        See all notifications

        Skip to content
        Moz logo Menu open Menu close
        • Products
          • Moz Pro
          • Moz Pro Home
          • Moz Local
          • Moz Local Home
          • STAT
          • Moz API
          • Moz API Home
          • Compare SEO Products
          • Moz Data
        • Free SEO Tools
          • Domain Analysis
          • Keyword Explorer
          • Link Explorer
          • Competitive Research
          • MozBar
          • More Free SEO Tools
        • Learn SEO
          • Beginner's Guide to SEO
          • SEO Learning Center
          • Moz Academy
          • MozCon
          • Webinars, Whitepapers, & Guides
        • Blog
        • Why Moz
          • Digital Marketers
          • Agency Solutions
          • Enterprise Solutions
          • Small Business Solutions
          • The Moz Story
          • New Releases
        • Log in
        • Log out
        • Products
          • Moz Pro

            Your all-in-one suite of SEO essentials.

          • Moz Local

            Raise your local SEO visibility with complete local SEO management.

          • STAT

            SERP tracking and analytics for enterprise SEO experts.

          • Moz API

            Power your SEO with our index of over 44 trillion links.

          • Compare SEO Products

            See which Moz SEO solution best meets your business needs.

          • Moz Data

            Power your SEO strategy & AI models with custom data solutions.

          Let your business shine with Listings AI
          Moz Local

          Let your business shine with Listings AI

          Learn more
        • Free SEO Tools
          • Domain Analysis

            Get top competitive SEO metrics like DA, top pages and more.

          • Keyword Explorer

            Find traffic-driving keywords with our 1.25 billion+ keyword index.

          • Link Explorer

            Explore over 40 trillion links for powerful backlink data.

          • Competitive Research

            Uncover valuable insights on your organic search competitors.

          • MozBar

            See top SEO metrics for free as you browse the web.

          • More Free SEO Tools

            Explore all the free SEO tools Moz has to offer.

          NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic
          Moz Pro

          NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic

          Learn more
        • Learn SEO
          • Beginner's Guide to SEO

            The #1 most popular introduction to SEO, trusted by millions.

          • SEO Learning Center

            Broaden your knowledge with SEO resources for all skill levels.

          • On-Demand Webinars

            Learn modern SEO best practices from industry experts.

          • How-To Guides

            Step-by-step guides to search success from the authority on SEO.

          • Moz Academy

            Upskill and get certified with on-demand courses & certifications.

          • MozCon

            Save on Early Bird tickets and join us in London or New York City

          Unlock flexible pricing & new endpoints
          Moz API

          Unlock flexible pricing & new endpoints

          Find your plan
        • Blog
        • Why Moz
          • Digital Marketers

            Simplify SEO tasks to save time and grow your traffic.

          • Small Business Solutions

            Uncover insights to make smarter marketing decisions in less time.

          • Agency Solutions

            Earn & keep valuable clients with unparalleled data & insights.

          • Enterprise Solutions

            Gain a competitive edge in the ever-changing world of search.

          • The Moz Story

            Moz was the first & remains the most trusted SEO company.

          • New Releases

            Get the scoop on the latest and greatest from Moz.

          Surface actionable competitive intel
          New Feature

          Surface actionable competitive intel

          Learn More
        • Log in
          • Moz Pro
          • Moz Local
          • Moz Local Dashboard
          • Moz API
          • Moz API Dashboard
          • Moz Academy
        • Avatar
          • Moz Home
          • Notifications
          • Account & Billing
          • Manage Users
          • Community Profile
          • My Q&A
          • My Videos
          • Log Out

        The Moz Q&A Forum

        • Forum
        • Questions
        • My Q&A
        • Users
        • Ask the Community

        Welcome to the Q&A Forum

        Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

        1. Home
        2. SEO Tactics
        3. Intermediate & Advanced SEO
        4. Are pages with a canonical tag indexed?

        Moz Q&A is closed.

        After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.

        Are pages with a canonical tag indexed?

        Intermediate & Advanced SEO
        3
        17
        17864
        Loading More Posts
        • Watching

          Notify me of new replies.
          Show question in unread.

        • Not Watching

          Do not notify me of new replies.
          Show question in unread if category is not ignored.

        • Ignoring

          Do not notify me of new replies.
          Do not show question in unread.

        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes
        Reply
        • Reply as question
        Locked
        This topic has been deleted. Only users with question management privileges can see it.
        • fablau
          fablau last edited by

          Hello here,

          here are my questions for you related to the canonical tag:

          1. If I put online a new webpage with a canonical tag pointing to a different page, will this new page be indexed by Google and will I be able to find it in the index?

          2. If instead I apply the canonical tag to a page already in the index, will this page be removed from the index?

          Thank you in advance for any insights!

          Fabrizio

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • fablau
            fablau @mememax last edited by

            Yes, I will look into doing that on GWT.

            Was a nice and useful chat indeed! Thank you again.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • mememax
              mememax @fablau last edited by

              Sorry Fabrizio I got mad with my old answer 🙂

              that canonical doesn't make sense with a noindex, with noindex follow.you're completely fine.

              Summing up I think that you have many parameters so you should try to write them down and define the role of each one.

              Then add them in GWT and choose there which are the ones which doesn't add any value and which you want to "block" (instead of putting a noindex).

              The valuable ones (the one which adds value and changes content) should contain the self canonical and paginated next/prev. If you can get rid of unesful parameters it could be better so to have cleaner and shorter urls.

              Just be sure that you're mainly using the most important parameters so you're consistent with your strategy.

              Hope this will clear your doubts, it was a nice chat! 🙂

              fablau 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • fablau
                fablau @Dr-Pete last edited by

                Yes, actually I could get rid of the lpg parameter (it wasn't really needed!), so now the tag definitions are (for the 3rd page of the Guitar index):

                <LINK rel="<a class="attribute-value">next</a>" href="[http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=4](view-source:http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=4)"> <LINK rel="<a class="attribute-value">prev</a>" href="[http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=2](view-source:http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=2)"> <LINK rel="<a class="attribute-value">canonical</a>" href="[http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=3](view-source:http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=3)">
                

                Now, the only doubt I still have is to add or not add the noindex tag to the page when it is requested to be displayed in a different way (such as the "table view" or a different item display order). In my opinion, if I stick with the canonical tag I don't need a noindex directive. What do you think?

                mememax 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Dr-Pete
                  Dr-Pete Staff @mememax last edited by

                  Yeah, to be fair, I'm not clear on what all of the additional parameters (like "lpg=") do, so this can get tricky fast. Basically, look at it this way:

                  If the URL is:
                  example.com/page=3?param=x

                  Then the tags should point to:

                  Rel=prev:
                  example.com/page=2?param=x

                  Rel=next:
                  example.com/page=4?param=x

                  Rel=canonical:
                  example.com/page=3 (no parameters)

                  Some parameters may not be indexed and/or functional, though, so individual cases can vary. You may choose to ignore some parameters in Google Webmaster Tools, for example. It gets tricky as the parameter list grows.

                  fablau 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • fablau
                    fablau @mememax last edited by

                    Mememax, after thinking I have some doubts though about what you have suggested.

                    Why I want to put a noindex tag to the page displaying the list in "table view" if I already have a canonical tag pointing to the "regular view" page? Wouldn't the canonical tag be enough for the purpose of telling that the "real" canonical page is the "regular view" version? I am asking this because if I want to apply a noindex tag to that kind of different view, I may want to do the same to the list displayed with a different order, and for any other different way of displaying the list, etc... hence just using the canonical tag would be appropriate, pointing always to the "regular list" view, no matter what kind of "filtering" or "different view' option is selected. What do you think?

                    In other words, I don't think I need to include a noindex tag for any different kind of view the user requests as long as I provide a canonical tag pointing to the regular view list.

                    Am I correct?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • fablau
                      fablau @mememax last edited by

                      Yes, thank you Mememax, I agree with you 100%. That makes perfect sense and I will work on that tomorrow morning. I am eager to know Dr. Peter thoughts and confirmation.

                      On my side, I think I got it cleared-up now. Thank you very much again!

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • fablau
                        fablau @Dr-Pete last edited by

                        Thank you ! That makes sense now.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • mememax
                          mememax @fablau last edited by

                          Hey Fabrizio, I think that what Google states in their guidelines is that you have two choices:

                          • if you have a view all page, you should noindex and follow all your other pages so google will deliver only that page
                          • if you don't have a view all page or if you prefer to show paginated series (i.e. to make pages lighter and quicker to deliver to users) you may consider to use rel next/prev.

                          In this second case it may happen that you also add filters or session ids in the urls of those pages, in that case you should consider adding a self referentail canonical tag to avoid duplicates. But this is only if you cover this case, if you're looking to canonicalize correctly your paginated series you may not use the self canonical tag, because if not properly implemented this may get you a bit of extra work.

                          In this page for example

                          I found this:

                          http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=3&lpg=0">

                          Which  I don't think is what you want to do.

                          Also if you set the page to view as a table: your url changes to http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=3&viewlistflag=1

                          and while the canonical should remain the same (well done but I think you should get rid of the lpg parameter in the canonical), the rel next prev should change accordingly IMO.

                          So instead of being:

                          prev: http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=2&lpg=20
                          next: http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=4&lpg=60

                          you should offer the next and prev page of the filtered url:

                          next: http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=4&lpg=60&viewlistflag=1
                          prev: http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=2&lpg=20&viewlistflag=1

                          Or in this case (since the content is almost the same you may consider the list page as the canonical of the table one putting there a noindex.

                          Summing up, IMO: in this page http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=3

                          you'll have:

                          prev: http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=4&lpg=60
                          next: http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=2&lpg=20
                          (optional) a self canonical to http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=3

                          In this page (and in other filtered pages if you have apply the same idea):
                          http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=3&viewlistflag=1

                          You'll have:

                          noindex,follow and canonical to the list page:
                          http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=3

                          maybe dr peter can correct me if I'm wrong but I think this should be more consistent like this. Sorry for the huge answer

                          fablau Dr-Pete 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • Dr-Pete
                            Dr-Pete Staff @fablau last edited by

                            Wow, yes - sorry about that. I've updated it. Google original write-up actually covers this case, too (it's toward the end):

                            http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2011/09/pagination-with-relnext-and-relprev.html

                            fablau 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • fablau
                              fablau @Dr-Pete last edited by

                              Please, have a look at the page below, I have modified the canonical tag as suggested:

                              http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=3&lpg=40

                              Is that correct?

                              Thank you again very much.

                              mememax 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • fablau
                                fablau @Dr-Pete last edited by

                                Thank you Peter, I guess you meant to have the "canonical" tag as last tag in your example above, and also the previous rel=next and rel=prev definitions should be inverted:

                                Am I correct? That makes sense. If so, I will update my site to reflect this.

                                Thank you for the link!

                                Dr-Pete 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • Dr-Pete
                                  Dr-Pete Staff @fablau last edited by

                                  This gets tricky fast. Google currently wants rel=prev/next to contain the parameters currently in use (like sorts) for the page you're on and then wants you rel-canonical to the non-parameterized version. So, if the URL is:

                                  http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=3&lpg=40

                                  ...then the tags should be...

                                  Yeah, it's a bit strange. They have suggested that it's ok to rel-canonical to a "View All" page, but with the kind of product volume you have, that's generally a bad idea (for users and search). The have specifically recommended against setting rel-canonical to Page 1 of search results, especially if you use rel=prev/next.

                                  Rel=prev/next will still show pages in the index, but I've found it to work pretty well. The other option is the more classic approach to simple META NOINDEX, FOLLOW pages 2+. That can still be effective, but it's getting less common.

                                  Adam Audette has generally strong posts about this topic - here's a good, recent one:

                                  http://searchengineland.com/the-latest-greatest-on-seo-pagination-114284

                                  fablau 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • fablau
                                    fablau @Dr-Pete last edited by

                                    Thank you for your post, and I think you have just opened a doubt I had, and that's exactly what also concerned me.

                                    Have a look at this typical category page of ours:

                                    http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html

                                    For that category pagination, I have implemented the rel=prev/next as suggested by Google, but being afraid to be penalized for duplicate content, I also put a canonical tag pointing at the first page of that index. Should I have put the canonical tag pointing to the page series itself?

                                    Something like:

                                    http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=2

                                    
                                    for the second page instead of the general:
                                    
                                    

                                    http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html

                                    as I am currently doing?

                                    Thanks!

                                    Dr-Pete 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • Dr-Pete
                                      Dr-Pete Staff last edited by

                                      I have to disagree on this one. If Google honors a canonical tag, the non-canonical page will generally disappear from the index, at least inasmuch as we can measure it (with "site:", getting it to rank, etc.). It's a strong signal in many cases.

                                      This is part of the reason Google introduced rel=prev/next for paginated content. With canonical, pages in the series aren't usually able to rank. Rel=prev/next allows them to rank without clogging up the index (theoretically). For search pagination, it's generally a better solution.

                                      If your paginated content is still showing in large quantities in the index, Google may not be honoring the canonical tag properly, and they could be causing duplicate content issues. It depends on the implementation, but they recommend these days that you don't canonical to the first page of search results. Google may choose to ignore the tag in some cases.

                                      fablau 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                                      • fablau
                                        fablau @mememax last edited by

                                        Thank you very much, that makes perfect sense. In my case, I am talking exactly about paginated content, and that's probably why all pages are in the index despite they are canonicalized to point to the main page. So, I guess that even if you have thousands of paginated pages indexed (mine is a pretty big e-commerce website), that's not going to be an issue. Am I right?

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • mememax
                                          mememax last edited by

                                          Normally the only thing which will prevent a page from ranking is noindex tag. If you don't want to have it indexed just noindex it, if that page has been laready indexed, put the noindex tag and delete from index using GWT option.

                                          Concerning the canonical tag thing, it will consolidate the seo value in one page but it won't prevent those page to appear in rankings, however you may have two cases:

                                          1. the two or more pages are identical. In that case google may accept the canonicalization and show always the original page.
                                          2. the two or more pages are slightly different, it's the case of paginated pages which are canonicalized using rel next/prev. In that sense the whole value will be consolidated in page 1 but then the page which will be shown in the rankings will be the one which responds to that query, for example if someone is looking for blue glass, google will return the page which shows blue glass listing if that's different from the first one.

                                          Hope this may help you!

                                          fablau 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                                          • 1 / 1
                                          • First post
                                            Last post

                                          Browse Questions

                                          Explore more categories

                                          • Moz Tools

                                            Chat with the community about the Moz tools.

                                          • SEO Tactics

                                            Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers

                                          • Community

                                            Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!

                                          • Digital Marketing

                                            Chat about tactics outside of SEO

                                          • Research & Trends

                                            Dive into research and trends in the search industry.

                                          • Support

                                            Connect on product support and feature requests.

                                          • See all categories

                                          Related Questions

                                          • Alancito

                                            Alternate page with proper canonical tag Status: Excluded in Google webmaster tools.

                                            canonical google webmaster

                                            In Google Webmaster Tools, I have a coverage issue. I am getting this error message: Alternate page with proper canonical tag Status: Excluded. It gives the below blog post page as an example. Any idea how to resolve? At one time, I was using handl utm grabber, but the plugin is deactivated on my website. https://www.savacations.com/turrialba-costa-ricas-garden-city/?utm_source=deleted&utm_medium=deleted&utm_term=deleted&utm_content=deleted&utm_campaign=deleted&gclid=deleted5.

                                            Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Alancito
                                            0
                                          • Ben-R

                                            E-Commerce Site Collection Pages Not Being Indexed

                                            Hello Everyone, So this is not really my strong suit but I’m going to do my best to explain the full scope of the issue and really hope someone has any insight. We have an e-commerce client (can't really share the domain) that uses Shopify; they have a large number of products categorized by Collections. The issue is when we do a site:search of our Collection Pages (site:Domain.com/Collections/) they don’t seem to be indexed. Also, not sure if it’s relevant but we also recently did an over-hall of our design. Because we haven’t been able to identify the issue here’s everything we know/have done so far: Moz Crawl Check and the Collection Pages came up. Checked Organic Landing Page Analytics (source/medium: Google) and the pages are getting traffic. Submitted the pages to Google Search Console. The URLs are listed on the sitemap.xml but when we tried to submit the Collections sitemap.xml to Google Search Console 99 were submitted but nothing came back as being indexed (like our other pages and products). We tested the URL in GSC’s robots.txt tester and it came up as being “allowed” but just in case below is the language used in our robots:
                                            User-agent: *
                                            Disallow: /admin
                                            Disallow: /cart
                                            Disallow: /orders
                                            Disallow: /checkout
                                            Disallow: /9545580/checkouts
                                            Disallow: /carts
                                            Disallow: /account
                                            Disallow: /collections/+
                                            Disallow: /collections/%2B
                                            Disallow: /collections/%2b
                                            Disallow: /blogs/+
                                            Disallow: /blogs/%2B
                                            Disallow: /blogs/%2b
                                            Disallow: /design_theme_id
                                            Disallow: /preview_theme_id
                                            Disallow: /preview_script_id
                                            Disallow: /apple-app-site-association
                                            Sitemap: https://domain.com/sitemap.xml A Google Cache:Search currently shows a collections/all page we have up that lists all of our products. Please let us know if there’s any other details we could provide that might help. Any insight or suggestions would be very much appreciated. Looking forward to hearing all of your thoughts! Thank you in advance. Best,

                                            Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Ben-R
                                            0
                                          • MBASydney

                                            Date of page first indexed or age of a page?

                                            Hi does anyone know any ways, tools to find when a page was first indexed/cached by Google? I remember a while back, around 2009 i had a firefox plugin which could check this, and gave you a exact date. Maybe this has changed since. I don't remember the plugin. Or any recommendations on finding the age of a page (not domain) for a website? This is for competitor research not my own website. Cheers, Paul

                                            Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MBASydney
                                            0
                                          • VanguardCommunications

                                            Is it okay to copy and paste on page content into the meta description tag?

                                            I have heard conflicting answers to this.   I always figured that it was okay to selectively copy and paste on page content into the meta description tag.....especially if the onpage content is well written.    How can it be duplicate content if it's pulling from the exact same page? Does anybody have any feedback from a credible source about this? Thanks.

                                            Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | VanguardCommunications
                                            1
                                          • deskstudio

                                            How to Remove Joomla Canonical and Duplicate Page Content

                                            I've  attempted to follow advice from the Q&A section. Currently on the site www.cherrycreekspine.com, I've edited the .htaccess file to help with 301s - all pages redirect to www.cherrycreekspine.com. Secondly, I'd added the canonical statement in the header of the web pages. I have cut the Duplicate Page Content in half ... now  I have a remaining 40 pages to fix up. This is my practice site to try and understand what SEOmoz can do for me. I've looked at some of your videos on Youtube ... I feel like I'm scrambling around to the Q&A and the internet to understand this product. I'm reading the beginners guide.... any other resources would be helpful.

                                            Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | deskstudio
                                            0
                                          • theLotter

                                            Should pages of old news articles be indexed?

                                            My website published about 3 news articles a day and is set up so that old news articles can be accessed through a "back" button with articles going to page 2 then page 3 then page 4, etc... as new articles push them down.  The pages include a link to the article and a short snippet. I was thinking I would want Google to index the first 3 pages of articles, but after that the pages are not worthwhile.  Could these pages harm me and should they be noindexed and/or added as a canonical URL to the main news page - or is leaving them as is fine because they are so deep into the site that Google won't see them, but I also won't be penalized for having week content? Thanks for the help!

                                            Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | theLotter
                                            0
                                          • Jellyfish-Agency

                                            Rel=canonical tag on original page?

                                            Afternoon All,
                                            We are using Concrete5 as our CMS system, we are due to change but for the moment we have to play with what we have got. Part of the C5 system allows us to attribute our main page into other categories, via a page alaiser add-on. But what it also does is create several url paths and duplicate pages depending on how many times we take the original page and reference it in other categories. We have tried C5 canonical/SEO add-on's but they all seem to fall short. We have tried to address this issue in the most efficient way possible by using the rel=canonical tag. The only issue is the limitations of our cms system. We add the canonical tag to the original page header and this will automatically place this tag on all the duplicate pages and in turn fix the problem of duplicate content. The only problem is the canonical tag is on the original page as well, but it is referencing itself, effectively creating a tagging circle. Does anyone foresee a problem with the canonical tag being on the original page but in turn referencing itself? What we have done is try to simplify our duplicate content issues. We have over 2500 duplicate page issues because of this aliasing add-on and want to automate the canonical tag addition, rather than go to each individual page and manually add this tag, so the original reference page can remain the original. We have implemented this tag on one page at the moment with 9 duplicate pages/url's and are monitoring, but was curious if people had experienced this before or had any thoughts?

                                            Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Jellyfish-Agency
                                            0
                                          • barney3012

                                            Should you stop indexing of short lived pages?

                                            In my site there will be a lot of pages that have a short life span of about a week as they are items on sale, should I nofollow the links meaning the site has a fwe hundred pages or allow indexing and have thousands but then have lots of links to pages that do not exist. I would of course if allowing indexing make sure the page links does not error and sends them to a similarly relevant page but which is best for me with the SEarch Engines? I would like to have the option of loads of links with pages of loads of content but not if it is detrimental Thanks

                                            Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | barney3012
                                            0

                                          Get started with Moz Pro!

                                          Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

                                          Start my free trial
                                          Products
                                          • Moz Pro
                                          • Moz Local
                                          • Moz API
                                          • Moz Data
                                          • STAT
                                          • Product Updates
                                          Moz Solutions
                                          • SMB Solutions
                                          • Agency Solutions
                                          • Enterprise Solutions
                                          • Digital Marketers
                                          Free SEO Tools
                                          • Domain Authority Checker
                                          • Link Explorer
                                          • Keyword Explorer
                                          • Competitive Research
                                          • Brand Authority Checker
                                          • Local Citation Checker
                                          • MozBar Extension
                                          • MozCast
                                          Resources
                                          • Blog
                                          • SEO Learning Center
                                          • Help Hub
                                          • Beginner's Guide to SEO
                                          • How-to Guides
                                          • Moz Academy
                                          • API Docs
                                          About Moz
                                          • About
                                          • Team
                                          • Careers
                                          • Contact
                                          Why Moz
                                          • Case Studies
                                          • Testimonials
                                          Get Involved
                                          • Become an Affiliate
                                          • MozCon
                                          • Webinars
                                          • Practical Marketer Series
                                          • MozPod
                                          Connect with us

                                          Contact the Help team

                                          Join our newsletter
                                          Moz logo
                                          © 2021 - 2025 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
                                          • Accessibility
                                          • Terms of Use
                                          • Privacy

                                          Looks like your connection to Moz was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.