• seohunters9

        See all notifications

        Skip to content
        Moz logo Menu open Menu close
        • Products
          • Moz Pro
          • Moz Pro Home
          • Moz Local
          • Moz Local Home
          • STAT
          • Moz API
          • Moz API Home
          • Compare SEO Products
          • Moz Data
        • Free SEO Tools
          • Domain Analysis
          • Keyword Explorer
          • Link Explorer
          • Competitive Research
          • MozBar
          • More Free SEO Tools
        • Learn SEO
          • Beginner's Guide to SEO
          • SEO Learning Center
          • Moz Academy
          • MozCon
          • Webinars, Whitepapers, & Guides
        • Blog
        • Why Moz
          • Digital Marketers
          • Agency Solutions
          • Enterprise Solutions
          • Small Business Solutions
          • The Moz Story
          • New Releases
        • Log in
        • Log out
        • Products
          • Moz Pro

            Your all-in-one suite of SEO essentials.

          • Moz Local

            Raise your local SEO visibility with complete local SEO management.

          • STAT

            SERP tracking and analytics for enterprise SEO experts.

          • Moz API

            Power your SEO with our index of over 44 trillion links.

          • Compare SEO Products

            See which Moz SEO solution best meets your business needs.

          • Moz Data

            Power your SEO strategy & AI models with custom data solutions.

          Let your business shine with Listings AI
          Moz Local

          Let your business shine with Listings AI

          Learn more
        • Free SEO Tools
          • Domain Analysis

            Get top competitive SEO metrics like DA, top pages and more.

          • Keyword Explorer

            Find traffic-driving keywords with our 1.25 billion+ keyword index.

          • Link Explorer

            Explore over 40 trillion links for powerful backlink data.

          • Competitive Research

            Uncover valuable insights on your organic search competitors.

          • MozBar

            See top SEO metrics for free as you browse the web.

          • More Free SEO Tools

            Explore all the free SEO tools Moz has to offer.

          NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic
          Moz Pro

          NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic

          Learn more
        • Learn SEO
          • Beginner's Guide to SEO

            The #1 most popular introduction to SEO, trusted by millions.

          • SEO Learning Center

            Broaden your knowledge with SEO resources for all skill levels.

          • On-Demand Webinars

            Learn modern SEO best practices from industry experts.

          • How-To Guides

            Step-by-step guides to search success from the authority on SEO.

          • Moz Academy

            Upskill and get certified with on-demand courses & certifications.

          • MozCon

            Save on Early Bird tickets and join us in London or New York City

          Unlock flexible pricing & new endpoints
          Moz API

          Unlock flexible pricing & new endpoints

          Find your plan
        • Blog
        • Why Moz
          • Digital Marketers

            Simplify SEO tasks to save time and grow your traffic.

          • Small Business Solutions

            Uncover insights to make smarter marketing decisions in less time.

          • Agency Solutions

            Earn & keep valuable clients with unparalleled data & insights.

          • Enterprise Solutions

            Gain a competitive edge in the ever-changing world of search.

          • The Moz Story

            Moz was the first & remains the most trusted SEO company.

          • New Releases

            Get the scoop on the latest and greatest from Moz.

          Surface actionable competitive intel
          New Feature

          Surface actionable competitive intel

          Learn More
        • Log in
          • Moz Pro
          • Moz Local
          • Moz Local Dashboard
          • Moz API
          • Moz API Dashboard
          • Moz Academy
        • Avatar
          • Moz Home
          • Notifications
          • Account & Billing
          • Manage Users
          • Community Profile
          • My Q&A
          • My Videos
          • Log Out

        The Moz Q&A Forum

        • Forum
        • Questions
        • My Q&A
        • Users
        • Ask the Community

        Welcome to the Q&A Forum

        Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

        1. Home
        2. Moz Tools
        3. Moz Pro
        4. 301 or canonical for multiple homepage versions?

        Moz Q&A is closed.

        After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.

        301 or canonical for multiple homepage versions?

        Moz Pro
        5
        20
        5722
        Loading More Posts
        • Watching

          Notify me of new replies.
          Show question in unread.

        • Not Watching

          Do not notify me of new replies.
          Show question in unread if category is not ignored.

        • Ignoring

          Do not notify me of new replies.
          Do not show question in unread.

        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes
        Reply
        • Reply as question
        Locked
        This topic has been deleted. Only users with question management privileges can see it.
        • kimmiedawn
          kimmiedawn last edited by

          I used 301 redirects to point several versions of the homepage to www.site.com. i was just rereading moz's beginners guide to seo, and it uses that scenario as an example for rel canonical, not 301 redirects. Which is better? My understanding is that 301s remove all doubt of getting links to the wrong version and diluting link equity.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Cyrus-Shepard
            Cyrus-Shepard @kimmiedawn last edited by

            Looks like you found the solution below. Nice work!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • kimmiedawn
              kimmiedawn last edited by

              In case this is helpful to anyone else reading this post, here is the code I am now using in the .htaccess, which seems to have eradicated the double redirect (thanks to help from phranque and lucy24 at webmasterworld):

              RewriteEngine On

              RewriteCond %{THE_REQUEST} ^[A-Z]{3,9}\ /([^/.]+/)*(index.html|default.asp)\ HTTP/

              RewriteRule ^(([^/.]+/)*)(index|default) http://www.site.com/$1 [R=301,L]

              RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^(www.site.com)?$ [NC]

              RewriteRule (.*) http://www.site.com/$1 [R=301,L]

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • kimmiedawn
                kimmiedawn @Cyrus-Shepard last edited by

                Cyrus - Thanks. A familiar face - I've seen it attached to many an article that I've read;)

                While I have you here, maybe you can answer another question related to the situation that has me slightly nervous:

                I've read warnings about creating a loop with a 301 redirect - and I keep being pointed to default.asp in Open Site Explorer (with the message that the url I entered - www.site.com- redirects to /default.asp) but any redirect checkers I've used don't show that. Would it be obvious if I didn't implement it correctly? It looks fine in the browser.

                Would a rel canonical tag in addition to a 301 redirect be a good idea?

                Cyrus-Shepard 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Cyrus-Shepard
                  Cyrus-Shepard last edited by

                  Hi Kimberly,

                  The rel="canonical" is a good option when you can't 301 a page. If you can 301 a page, such as /index.html or some other duplicate version, it's usually a better way to go. As you said, it removes all doubt about where to send visitors and link equity.

                  Both rel canonicals and 301s pass about the same amount of link equity (thought to be around 85%) so it's safe to use either.

                  Canonical tags are usually best when you have lots of parameters needed to render the page, like homepage?color=red&length=long&manu=apple. In this case it wouldn't make much sense to 301, and the rel canonical is easier to implement.

                  Hope this helps. Best of luck with your SEO.

                  kimmiedawn 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • ThompsonPaul
                    ThompsonPaul @kimmiedawn last edited by

                    Glad that was useful, Kimberly. Many times, folks just want a "when this happens, do that" kind of response, but usually in SEO there so many "it depends" aspects to an issue that it's vastly more useful to understand the Why, so you can work out the solution to the specific issue yourself. Sounds like you're that kind of person too.

                    That said - this discussion seems to be going round and round on you. If you want to PM me your site address, I can get a handle on your exact situation and try to explain exactly what's happening. I have my suspicions, but don't want to confuse the issue further with speculation.

                    Paul

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • kimmiedawn
                      kimmiedawn last edited by

                      Could the code I used explain why Open Site Explorer won't let me view link data for www.site.com, but shows me www.site.com/default.asp instead? And within that data it shows an incoming link from www.site.com as a 301 redirect. But when I check it in a browser or redirect checker, it shows www.site.com as the final destination. My head hurts.

                      Edit: (This is what OSE says "The URL you've entered redirects to another URL. We're showing results for www.site.com/default.asp since it is likely to have more accurate link metrics. See data for www.site.com instead?")

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • kimmiedawn
                        kimmiedawn last edited by

                        I don't have access to the control panel and the person who does never did the redirect when I asked so i just did it myself with .htaccess. So did you say I should change it to your code and that will handle everything, including the double redirect?

                        (Edited out a question that I figured out the answer to.)

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • kimmiedawn
                          kimmiedawn last edited by

                          So you are saying I should use the following exact code instead of the code I have:

                          RewriteEngine On
                          RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www.domain.com$ [NC]
                          RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.domain.com/$1 [R=301,L]

                          And that will take care of the default.asp and index.html as well? And it won't redirect to the www in between, thus creating 2 redirects, correct?

                          If you don't mind explaining, what's the working difference between the first code I tried (below) and the above code that makes the above code work?

                          RewriteEngine On
                          RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www..* [NC]
                          RewriteRule ^(.*) http://www.%{HTTP_HOST}/$1 [R=301,L]

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • AlanMosley
                            AlanMosley @kimmiedawn last edited by

                            Yes that's classic asp

                            what sort of server is it on windows?

                            What sort of webserver IIS? if so what version, if it is 7 or greater it is very easy to do your redirects if you have access to the controlpanel

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • kimmiedawn
                              kimmiedawn last edited by

                              I didn't build the site, nor do I have anything to do with the hosting, but I do have FTP access. I can't remember how or why but I came to the conclusion that it's ASP Classic. Is there a quick way for me to double check? All the files end in .asp if that helps.

                              AlanMosley 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • AlanMosley
                                AlanMosley last edited by

                                you are correct, it want do the index.html or default.asp

                                but this rule will solve all your domain problems, not the "!" mean not, so if not the desired domain, then redirect to the desired domain not matter what the domain is. this will fix non www, or any other secondary domain you may have such as oldDomain.com or mergedSite.com

                                Options +FollowSymLinks RewriteEngine On
                                RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www.domain.com$ [NC]
                                RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.domain.com/$1 [R=301,L]

                                but if you have a page called default.asp. your site is a classic ASP site, ASP is a Microsoft technology and would be on a Microsoft web server IIS. if so 301 redirects are very easy to do.

                                Is your site ASP.is it on a Microsoft IIS server?

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • kimmiedawn
                                  kimmiedawn last edited by

                                  I would like to politely add (and first say that I do appreciate anyone's attempt at a helpful response) that it's a very delicate matter to be giving answers without 100% certainty or valid first-hand experience. At least we as a community should be careful to include somewhat of a disclaimer should our answers be anything less than certain. I, for one, do not want to steer anyone down a dangerous path. I do understand it's my responsibility to gauge the accuracy of an answer before I implement it. Think of the potential consequences to someone else if they implement bad/incorrect advice on a site - ouch!

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • kimmiedawn
                                    kimmiedawn last edited by

                                    Thank you Paul! Knowing the WHY behind something always solidifies my understanding of a concept. It does make me wonder why the cheat sheet linked by Sangeetac and Moz's Beginner's Guide to SEO both use that scenario as an example for a 301 redirect - it certainly adds to the confusion.

                                    Alan - while we are on the subject...here is the code I used for the 301 redirect, which was my first ever using .htaccess. The problem is it redirects twice from certain starting points: first from site.com/default.asp to www.site.com/default.asp then to www.site.com/.

                                    RewriteEngine On
                                    RewriteCond %{THE_REQUEST} /index.html? [NC]
                                    RewriteRule ^(./)?index.html?$ /$1 [R=301,L]
                                    RewriteCond %{THE_REQUEST} /default.asp? [NC]
                                    RewriteRule ^(.
                                    /)?default.asp?$ /$1 [R=301,L]
                                    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www..* [NC]
                                    RewriteRule ^(.*) http://www.%{HTTP_HOST}/$1 [R=301,L]

                                    Initially I tried this (which I think is what you are suggesting?), but if I remember correctly, it wasn't taking care of default.asp or index.html (don't quote me on that):

                                    RewriteEngine On

                                    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www..* [NC]

                                    RewriteRule ^(.*) http://www.%{HTTP_HOST}/$1 [R=301,L]

                                    Thanks for helping me do things the right way!

                                    ThompsonPaul 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • AlanMosley
                                      AlanMosley @ThompsonPaul last edited by

                                      Agree with Paul here.

                                      A 301 is a directive to the crawler, while a canonical tag is only a hint and is not always followed. Bing for one will ignore canonical tags if it believes they are misused.

                                      as for the mention of "multiple 301 redirect" .

                                      You do not need to have a 301 redirect for every url, just follow the logic
                                      if HTTP_Host is not myPreferredDomain then redirect to myPreferredDomain

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • ThompsonPaul
                                        ThompsonPaul last edited by

                                        Sorry, I have to categorically disagree with Sangeetac here. Kimberley, your understanding is entirely correct.

                                        There's so much misinformation and misunderstanding about canonicalization, and there doesn't really need to be.

                                        The rel canonical tag is ONLY to be used when there is a justifiable reason why the multiple duplicate pages in question should actually be reachable via different URLs. Unless such a reason exists, you should ALWAYS use a 301 redirect.

                                        Put another way, duplicate page issues should ALWAYS be resolved using 301 redirects unless doing so would harm the user experience.

                                        In the case of multiple versions of a home page, there is absolutely NO BENEFIT to the user to be able to reach that page via multiple different URLs. (In fact the multiple URLs could be confusing.) Therefore, the 301 redirect should be used to FORCE the user (and search engine) to the single version the site owner has decided should be the primary URL. Again, the other URLs are pointless, so the user should be blocked from ever being able to reach them. Using the 301 in this case has the added benefit of explicitly and automatically telling the search engines that all the redirected URLs for that page should be dropped from the index as they are non-functional. (And that's exactly what happened, Kimberley, as you saw default.asp and index.htm disappear from the index.)

                                        The ONLY time you'd use a rel canonical tag in this case, instead of a 301 redirect, is if for some reason the site owner doesn't have sufficient access to the sever files to be able to implement a 301 redirect properly. In that case, a rel canonical tag can be used as a "better than nothing" solution.

                                        The classic example of when to use a rel canonical tag is in the case of a page that lists a large number of products. That default (and therefore canonical version) version of the page may very well list the products in the order they were added to inventory. There may well be additional versions of the page, each at a different URL (often using query parameters, for example) which lists exactly the same content, but one page sorted by size, another version sorted by colour, yet another sorted by price.

                                        Obviously in this case, 301-redirecting those additional dupe pages to the original page would be harmful to the user experience, because the user would never be able to access the content sorted the way they want to see it. So each duplicate version of the page has value to the user and therefore MUST remain available to the user, and therefore to the search engine.

                                        In this case, the site owner adds a rel canonical tag to each of the dupe pages pointing to the primary (canonical) version, to make it clear to the search engine that the dupe pages are intentional secondary variations that should pass all their ranking value back to the primary page. But NOTE! Google themselves say they consider the rel canonical tag as a suggestion only, and will ignore it if they deem it incorrect or manipulative. So it is NOT NEARLY as strong an indicator as a 301 redirect which forces both user and search engine into the desired behaviour.

                                        Sorry if that got a little long-winded, but once we get clear on the basic purpose of 301 redirects vs rel canonical tags, it becomes much more straightforward which to use when. The confusion usually stems from folks trying to justify using canonical tags for purposes for which they were never designed. They are not a panacea or a catch-all for fixing site architecture mistakes.

                                        Hope that clears, rather than muddies the waters?

                                        Paul

                                        AlanMosley 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 7
                                        • kimmiedawn
                                          kimmiedawn last edited by

                                          And I just did a site operator search fror default.asp and index.htm and they are no longer in the index, though I never removed them after the 301 redirect. So I'm assuming Google did the math as expected.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • kimmiedawn
                                            kimmiedawn last edited by

                                            Please excuse the typos - my iPad does not like complying

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • kimmiedawn
                                              kimmiedawn last edited by

                                              Thanks for the link to that cheat sheet, I had forgotten about that! I have to say, the contradictory information I find and receive regarding SEO can make learning feel counterproductive half the time. Last time I asked this question, I was told 301 redirects were the correct plan of action. Are they equally good so long as I remove the others from the index? I am still seeing default.asp in some report

                                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                              • SangeetaC
                                                SangeetaC Subscriber Banned last edited by

                                                if you have several versions of homepage, it is good to use rel='canonical' instead of 301. If you will use multiple 301 redirect then you have to make sure to remove these urls from google or bing webmaster's url removal tool. For more info about canonical tag, visit Moz's Developer cheat sheet.

                                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote -2
                                                • 1 / 1
                                                • First post
                                                  Last post

                                                Browse Questions

                                                Explore more categories

                                                • Moz Tools

                                                  Chat with the community about the Moz tools.

                                                • SEO Tactics

                                                  Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers

                                                • Community

                                                  Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!

                                                • Digital Marketing

                                                  Chat about tactics outside of SEO

                                                • Research & Trends

                                                  Dive into research and trends in the search industry.

                                                • Support

                                                  Connect on product support and feature requests.

                                                • See all categories

                                                Related Questions

                                                • Ben-R

                                                  Why Only Our Homepage Can Be Crawled Showing a Redirect Message as the Meta Title

                                                  Hello Everyone, So recently when we checked our domain using a Moz Crawl Test and Screaming Frog only the homepage comes up and the meta title says “You are being redirected to…”. We have several pages that used to come up and when submitting them to GSC no issues come up. The robots.txt file looks fine as well. We thought this might be ‘server’ related but it’s a little out of our field of expertise so we thought we would find out if anyone has any experience with this (ideas of reasons, how to check…etc.) or any potential suggestions. Any extra insight would be really appreciated. Please let us know if there is anything we could provide further details for that might. Looking forward to hearing from all of you! Thanks in advance. Best,

                                                  Moz Pro | | Ben-R
                                                  0
                                                • AspenFasteners

                                                  Is one page with long content better than multiple pages with shorter content?

                                                  (Note, the site links are from a sandbox site and has very low DA or PA) If you look at this page, you will see at the bottom a lengthy article detailing all of the properties of the product categories in the links above. http://www.aspensecurityfasteners.com/Screws-s/432.htm My question is, is there more SEO value in having the one long article in the general product category page, or in breaking up the content and moving the sub-topics as content to the more specific sub-category pages? e.g. http://www.aspensecurityfasteners.com/Screws-Button-Head-Socket-s/1579.htm
                                                  http://www.aspensecurityfasteners.com/Screws-Cap-Screws-s/331.htm
                                                  http://www.aspensecurityfasteners.com/Screws-Captive-Panel-Scre-s/1559.htm

                                                  Moz Pro | | AspenFasteners
                                                  0
                                                • Adam_RushHour_Marketing

                                                  Canonical URLs all show trailing slash on main site pages - using Yoast SEO for Wordpress - how to correct

                                                  We are using Yoast for a number of our sites.  We use naked domain as the canonical. I have noticed in the header tags that all our sites show the canonical URLs as having a trailing slash: Example:   http;//foxspizzajc.com, when I look at the source code, it shows the canonical as http;//foxspizzajc.com/ Of course, it is much more likely that all sites that link to us will not use the trailing slash - so preferably we do not want that to be the canonical - among other reasons. Does this need to be fixed so the trailing slash is removed? I cannot see how to do this in Yoast SEO or in Permalinks structure for Wordpress. Sorry for my ignorance. Thanks for any help.

                                                  Moz Pro | | Adam_RushHour_Marketing
                                                  1
                                                • TysonDowns

                                                  White Label Version of Moz Pro?

                                                  I may have missed it, but is there a white label option for Moz Pro? I have a few clients that would like to login and have a look at competition, rankings, etc. Perhaps something like WebCEO or MySEOtool?

                                                  Moz Pro | | TysonDowns
                                                  0
                                                • notgwenevere

                                                  HTC access 301 redirect rules regarding pagination and striped category base (wp)

                                                  I am an admin of a wordpress.org blog and I used to use "Yoast All in one SEO" plugin. While I was using this plugin it stripped the category base from my blog post URL's. With yoast all in one seo: Site.com/topic/subtpoic/page/#
                                                  Without yoast all in one seo: Site.com/category/topic/subtopic/page/# Now, that I have switched to another plugin, I am trying to manage the page crawl errors which are tremendous somewhere around 1800, mostly due to pagination. Rather than redirecting each URL individually I would like to develop HTC access 301 redirects rules. However all instructions on how to create these HTC access 301 redirect rules are regarding the suffix rather than the category base. So my question is, can HTC access 301 redirects rules work to fix this problem? Including pagination?  And if so, what would this particular HTC access 301 redirect look like? Especially regarding pagination? And do I really have to write a 301 redirect for each pagination page?

                                                  Moz Pro | | notgwenevere
                                                  0
                                                • yacpro13

                                                  Some questions on Canonical tag AND 301 redirect

                                                  Hi everyone, I'm new here - always loved SEOMoz and glad to be part of the Pro community now. I have 2 questions regarding the Canonical URL tag. Some background info: We used to run an OsCommerce store, and recently migrated to Magento. In doing so, we right away created 301 redirects of the old category pages (OsCommerce) to the new category pages (Magento) via the Magento admin. Example: www.example.com/old-widget-category.html
                                                  301 redicrected to
                                                  www.example.com/new-widget-category.html In Magento admin, we have enabled the Canonical tag for all product and category pages. Here's how Magento sets up the Canonical tag: The URL of interest which we want to rank is:
                                                  www.example.com/new-widget-category.html However Magento sets up the canonical tag on this page to point to:
                                                  www.example.com/old-widget-category.html When using the SEOMoz On Page Report Card, it pick this up as an error because the Canonical tag is pointing to a different URL. However, if we dig a little deeper, we see that the URL being pointed to
                                                  www.example.com/old-widget-category.html
                                                  has a 301 redirect to
                                                  www.example.com/new-widget-category.html
                                                  which is the URL we wan to rank. So because we set up a 301 redirect of the old-page to the new-page, on the new-page the canonical tag points to the old-page. Question 1)
                                                  What are you opinions on this? Do you think this method of setting up the Canonical tag is acceptable? Second question... We use pagination for category pages, so if we have 50 products in one category, we would have 5 pages of 10 products. The URL's would be: www.example.com/new-widget-category.html (which is the SAME as ?p=1)
                                                  www.example.com/new-widget-category.html?p=1
                                                  www.example.com/new-widget-category.html?p=2
                                                  www.example.com/new-widget-category.html?p=3
                                                  www.example.com/new-widget-category.html?p=4
                                                  www.example.com/new-widget-category.html?p=5 Now ALL the URLs above have the canonical tag set as:
                                                  <link rel="canonical" href="http://www.example.com/new-widget-category" /> However, the content of each page (page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) is different because different products are displayed. So far most what I read regarding the Canonical tag is that it is used for pages that have the same content but different URLs. I would hope that Google would combine the content of all 5 pages and view the result as a single URL www.example.com/new-widget-category Question 2) Is using the canonical tag appropriate in the case described above? Thanks !

                                                  Moz Pro | | yacpro13
                                                  0
                                                • holdtheonion

                                                  Blogger Duplicate Content? and Canonical Tag

                                                  Hello: I previously asked this question, but I would love to get more perspectives on this issue. In Blogger, there is an archive page and label(s) page(s) created for each main post. Firstly, does Google, esp. considering Blogger is their product, possibly see the archive and tag pages created in addition to the main post as partial duplicate content? The other dilemma is that each of these instances - main post, archive, label(s) - claim to be the canonical. Does anyone have any insight or experience with this issue and Blogger and how Google is treating the partial duplicates and the canonical claims to the same content (even though the archives and label pages are partial?) I do not see anything in Blogger settings that allows altering these settings - in fact, the only choices in Blogger settings are 'Email Posting' and 'Permissions' (could it be that I cannot see the other setting options because I am a guest and not the blog owner?) Thanks so much everyone! PS - I was not able to add the blog as a campaign in SEOmoz Pro, which in and of itself is odd - and which I've never seen before - could this be part of the issue? Are Blogger free blogs not able to be crawled for some reason via SEOmoz Pro?

                                                  Moz Pro | | holdtheonion
                                                  0
                                                • Brother22

                                                  Is there a tool to upload multiple URLs and gather statistics and page rank?

                                                  I was wondering if there is a tool out there where you can compile a list of URL resources, upload them in a CSV and run a report to gather and index each individual page. Does anyone know of a tool that can do this or do we need to create one?

                                                  Moz Pro | | Brother22
                                                  0

                                                Get started with Moz Pro!

                                                Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

                                                Start my free trial
                                                Products
                                                • Moz Pro
                                                • Moz Local
                                                • Moz API
                                                • Moz Data
                                                • STAT
                                                • Product Updates
                                                Moz Solutions
                                                • SMB Solutions
                                                • Agency Solutions
                                                • Enterprise Solutions
                                                • Digital Marketers
                                                Free SEO Tools
                                                • Domain Authority Checker
                                                • Link Explorer
                                                • Keyword Explorer
                                                • Competitive Research
                                                • Brand Authority Checker
                                                • Local Citation Checker
                                                • MozBar Extension
                                                • MozCast
                                                Resources
                                                • Blog
                                                • SEO Learning Center
                                                • Help Hub
                                                • Beginner's Guide to SEO
                                                • How-to Guides
                                                • Moz Academy
                                                • API Docs
                                                About Moz
                                                • About
                                                • Team
                                                • Careers
                                                • Contact
                                                Why Moz
                                                • Case Studies
                                                • Testimonials
                                                Get Involved
                                                • Become an Affiliate
                                                • MozCon
                                                • Webinars
                                                • Practical Marketer Series
                                                • MozPod
                                                Connect with us

                                                Contact the Help team

                                                Join our newsletter
                                                Moz logo
                                                © 2021 - 2025 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
                                                • Accessibility
                                                • Terms of Use
                                                • Privacy

                                                Looks like your connection to Moz was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.