Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Best Practices for Homepage Title Tag
- 
					
					
					
					
 Hi, I would like to know if there is any update about the best practices for the homepage title tag. I mean, a couple of years ago, it was still working placing main keywords in the homepage title tag. But since the last google SERP update, the number of characters that are being shown were reduced, and now we try to work with 55 and 56 characters. That has reduced our capacity of including many keywords on the title tag. Besides, search engines are smarter now to choose the correct inner page to show in SERP. But I am wondering if the Homepage Title should have a branded orientation or should include main keywords, cause it is still working that strategy. I would appreciatte any update in this issue. Thank you! 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Thanks again! 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Correct - I can give you a trick though. If the SERP is a high value page. Thousands if not millions of dollars has been spent on Adwords A/B testing the Ads that work on that page. When you frame your meta description and Title if you can - take into account the top Ads that companies keep on replaying. They would not keep running them, if not highly successful on that page. Go get them... 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Thank you! 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Thank you Tom! For sure, a ctr optimized title works better. I still don't know if having less kws in title tag pays the worth... I still don't know, what would be better Attractive title, but less keywords. 
 or
 less attractive title and more keywordsSpanish language makes it a little more difficult, cause generally words are longer, and you cannot say too much... Maybe the only way is testing for each case, what works better. 
 I wish it were esier!Thank you! 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Thank you John for your detailed answer! Very interesting insights 
 It seems that there is not easy way and not a general answer to this question.
- 
					
					
					
					
 Interesting responses - we specialize in title tags and descriptions. There is no uniform practice as such. I disagree more with Tom on the above, but he is also right! The suggested method by Alick is I believe still generally the best way forward. That said as Tom pointed out clickability should also be an integral feature in how you form the Title tag and description. So there is a trade off - and difficult often to find the balance SEO -v- Clickability. High traffic pages should have alot of thought and consideration - impacts can be massive. The positive is with the new search traffic data available in WMT's you can try a few options over several weeks. In the new WMT's you can monitor each page more accurately and the effect of Position, Impressions, Clicks and CTR changes. Our experience is that with changes to the Title & Description & the subsequent Clicks on page google re-evaluates "the page relevance to the query" to answer a "searchers query". Google re-sets or re-tests you. Google either then "publishes the page on more or less searches" and google monitors searchers behavior on the page when people click through, for stickiness. A good Title tag will have strong keyword elements and this can be be measured in WMT's as Google places the Result on more "searched pages". Immediately after indexing the page position may drop and likewise CTR. However the clicks go up. Why does this happen? It is because google believes the new result answers more searchers queries. Then the google tests how people respond to the page when they click through - if positive the page position climbs on the new pages - if there is no stickiness (ie they pogostick) it declines. If google believes the new page is answering a "searchers query" then the page ranking generally will slowly increase, and likewise CTR. Anyway maybe got a bit off track. But feel free to ask any questions. ps Yes I know google state CTR is not a ranking factor however they do take stock of what customers do on a page. 
- 
					
					
					
					
 I disagree with the post above. The most important thing for your title tag is to make it compelling enough to click. It's your biggest shop window - you need to use the space. A "Keyword - Keyword | Brand" isn't going to do that. You will, of course, want to include your primary keyword in there, but you tell me which of these you'd prefer to click: "Blue Widgets - Red Widgets | The Widgets Co" "Cheap Blue Widgets - Free USA Shipping! | The Widgets Co" Try and get your key selling points in the title tag as often as your keywords. Give the user a reason to click. In addition, title tags are truncated/shortened based on character width, not the number characters. Dr Pete at Moz put together a great preview tool that you can check your title tags in to make sure they won't be shortened. Hope this helps. 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Hi, Optimal format for any page title tag is **Primary Keyword - Secondary Keyword | Brand Name. ** You can use it same for homepage also. If a brand is well-known enough to make a difference in click-through rates in search results, the brand name should be first. If the brand is less known or relevant than the keyword, the keyword should be first. If you keep your titles under 55 characters, you can expect at least 95% of your titles to display properly Hope this helps. Thanks 
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
- 
		
		Moz ToolsChat with the community about the Moz tools. 
- 
		
		SEO TacticsDiscuss the SEO process with fellow marketers 
- 
		
		CommunityDiscuss industry events, jobs, and news! 
- 
		
		Digital MarketingChat about tactics outside of SEO 
- 
		
		Research & TrendsDive into research and trends in the search industry. 
- 
		
		SupportConnect on product support and feature requests. 
Related Questions
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Page Title shown in SERPS not the same as
 Hi all, I'm trying to get a homepage to rank for a certain term, but the page keeps showing up in the SERPS with the "Brand Name: Keyword" when I have written it as "Keyword - Brand Name" in the <title>tag. I can't even see "Brand Name" Keyword" in the code of the page so I don't know where Google is pulling this from? </p> <p>I have <meta name="robots" content="noodp,noydir"/> on the page.</p> <p>I'm running Yoast and have removed the Brand from the Site Name and the Page Title for the homepage is "Keyword - Brand Name" in WordPress. I've changed the meta description so I can see the page has been crawled and re-indexed as the new meta description is showing in the SERPs</p> <p>Any idea, where Google is pulling this Page Title from and how I can get it changed to read the actual <title> tag? Or is there something I need to change in WordPress?</p> <p>Thank you!</p></title> Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Marketing_Today0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Should I use **tags or h1/h2 tags for article titles on my homepage**
 I recently had an seo consultant recommend using tags instead of h1/h2 tags for article titles on the homepage of my news website and category landing pages. I've only seen this done a handful of times on news/editorial websites. For example: http://www.muscleandfitness.com/ Can anyone weigh in on this? Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | blankslatedumbo0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Membership/subscriber (/customer) only content and SEO best practice
 Hello Mozzers, I was wondering whether there's any best practice guidance out there re: how to deal with membership/subscriber (existing customer) only content on a website, from an SEO perspective - what is best practice? A few SEOs have told me to make some of the content visible to Google, for SEO purposes, yet I'm really not sure whether this is acceptable / manipulative, and I don't want to upset Google (or users for that matter!) Thanks in advance, Luke Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | McTaggart0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Best practice for expandable content
 We are in the middle of having new pages added to our website. On our website we will have a information section containing various details about a product, this information will be several paragraphs long. we were wanting to show the first paragraph and have a read more button to show the rest of the content that is hidden. Whats googles view on this, is this bad for seo? Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Alexogilvie0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Best practice for retiring old product pages
 We’re a software company. Would someone be able to help me with a basic process for retiring old product pages and re-directing the SEO value to new pages. We are retiring some old products to focus on new products. The new software has much similar functionality to the old software, but has more features. How can we ensure that the new pages get the best start in life? Also, what is the best way of doing this for users? Our plan currently is to: Leave the old pages up initially with a message to the user that the old software has been retired. There will also be a message explaining that the user might be interested in one of our new products and a link to the new pages. When traffic to these pages reduces, then we will delete these pages and re-direct them to the homepage. Has anyone got any recommendations for how we could approach this differently? One idea that I’m considering is to immediately re-direct the old product pages to the new pages. I was wondering if we could then provide a message to the user explaining that the old product has been retired but that the new improved product is available. I’d also be interested in pointing the re-directs to the new product pages that are most relevant rather than the homepage, so that they get the value of the old links. I’ve found in the past that old retirement pages for products can outrank the new pages as until you 301 them then all the links and authority flow to these pages. Any help would be very much appreciated 🙂 Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | RG_SEO0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Best way to implement canonical tags on an ecommerce site with many filter options?
 What would be the best way to add canonical tags to an ecommerce site with many filter options, for example, http://teacherexpress.scholastic.com? Should I include a canonical tag for all filter options under a category even though the pages don't have the same content? Thanks for reading! Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | DA20130
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Are pages with a canonical tag indexed?
 Hello here, here are my questions for you related to the canonical tag: 1. If I put online a new webpage with a canonical tag pointing to a different page, will this new page be indexed by Google and will I be able to find it in the index? 2. If instead I apply the canonical tag to a page already in the index, will this page be removed from the index? Thank you in advance for any insights! Fabrizio Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | fablau0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Does City In Title Tag Inhibit Broader Reach?
 I use our city/state in the majority of our title tags and consequently we do very well locallly for the majority of terms on our ecommerce site. I'm wondering however, if this "localized" optimization will inadvertently affect our keyword rankings outside of our city/state? If a keyword query does not include our city or state, would Google interpret our titles as less relevent and therefore move other results ahead of ours? The city/state is last in the string on the title: Blue Widgets - Our Company in City, State Thanks for any insight. Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | AWCthreads0
 
			
		 
			
		 
			
		 
			
		 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				