Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Best Practices for Homepage Title Tag
- 
					
					
					
					
 Hi, I would like to know if there is any update about the best practices for the homepage title tag. I mean, a couple of years ago, it was still working placing main keywords in the homepage title tag. But since the last google SERP update, the number of characters that are being shown were reduced, and now we try to work with 55 and 56 characters. That has reduced our capacity of including many keywords on the title tag. Besides, search engines are smarter now to choose the correct inner page to show in SERP. But I am wondering if the Homepage Title should have a branded orientation or should include main keywords, cause it is still working that strategy. I would appreciatte any update in this issue. Thank you! 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Thanks again! 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Correct - I can give you a trick though. If the SERP is a high value page. Thousands if not millions of dollars has been spent on Adwords A/B testing the Ads that work on that page. When you frame your meta description and Title if you can - take into account the top Ads that companies keep on replaying. They would not keep running them, if not highly successful on that page. Go get them... 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Thank you! 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Thank you Tom! For sure, a ctr optimized title works better. I still don't know if having less kws in title tag pays the worth... I still don't know, what would be better Attractive title, but less keywords. 
 or
 less attractive title and more keywordsSpanish language makes it a little more difficult, cause generally words are longer, and you cannot say too much... Maybe the only way is testing for each case, what works better. 
 I wish it were esier!Thank you! 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Thank you John for your detailed answer! Very interesting insights 
 It seems that there is not easy way and not a general answer to this question.
- 
					
					
					
					
 Interesting responses - we specialize in title tags and descriptions. There is no uniform practice as such. I disagree more with Tom on the above, but he is also right! The suggested method by Alick is I believe still generally the best way forward. That said as Tom pointed out clickability should also be an integral feature in how you form the Title tag and description. So there is a trade off - and difficult often to find the balance SEO -v- Clickability. High traffic pages should have alot of thought and consideration - impacts can be massive. The positive is with the new search traffic data available in WMT's you can try a few options over several weeks. In the new WMT's you can monitor each page more accurately and the effect of Position, Impressions, Clicks and CTR changes. Our experience is that with changes to the Title & Description & the subsequent Clicks on page google re-evaluates "the page relevance to the query" to answer a "searchers query". Google re-sets or re-tests you. Google either then "publishes the page on more or less searches" and google monitors searchers behavior on the page when people click through, for stickiness. A good Title tag will have strong keyword elements and this can be be measured in WMT's as Google places the Result on more "searched pages". Immediately after indexing the page position may drop and likewise CTR. However the clicks go up. Why does this happen? It is because google believes the new result answers more searchers queries. Then the google tests how people respond to the page when they click through - if positive the page position climbs on the new pages - if there is no stickiness (ie they pogostick) it declines. If google believes the new page is answering a "searchers query" then the page ranking generally will slowly increase, and likewise CTR. Anyway maybe got a bit off track. But feel free to ask any questions. ps Yes I know google state CTR is not a ranking factor however they do take stock of what customers do on a page. 
- 
					
					
					
					
 I disagree with the post above. The most important thing for your title tag is to make it compelling enough to click. It's your biggest shop window - you need to use the space. A "Keyword - Keyword | Brand" isn't going to do that. You will, of course, want to include your primary keyword in there, but you tell me which of these you'd prefer to click: "Blue Widgets - Red Widgets | The Widgets Co" "Cheap Blue Widgets - Free USA Shipping! | The Widgets Co" Try and get your key selling points in the title tag as often as your keywords. Give the user a reason to click. In addition, title tags are truncated/shortened based on character width, not the number characters. Dr Pete at Moz put together a great preview tool that you can check your title tags in to make sure they won't be shortened. Hope this helps. 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Hi, Optimal format for any page title tag is **Primary Keyword - Secondary Keyword | Brand Name. ** You can use it same for homepage also. If a brand is well-known enough to make a difference in click-through rates in search results, the brand name should be first. If the brand is less known or relevant than the keyword, the keyword should be first. If you keep your titles under 55 characters, you can expect at least 95% of your titles to display properly Hope this helps. Thanks 
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
- 
		
		Moz ToolsChat with the community about the Moz tools. 
- 
		
		SEO TacticsDiscuss the SEO process with fellow marketers 
- 
		
		CommunityDiscuss industry events, jobs, and news! 
- 
		
		Digital MarketingChat about tactics outside of SEO 
- 
		
		Research & TrendsDive into research and trends in the search industry. 
- 
		
		SupportConnect on product support and feature requests. 
Related Questions
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Best Practices for Title Tags for Product Listing Page
 My industry is commercial real estate in New York City. Our site has 300 real estate listings. The format we have been using for Title Tags are below. This probably disastrous from an SEO perspective. Using number is a total waste space. A few questions: Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Kingalan1
 -Should we set listing not no index if they are not content rich?
 -If we do choose to index them, should we avoid titles listing Square Footage and dollar amounts?
 -Since local SEO is critical, should the titles always list New York, NY or Manhattan, NY?
 -I have red that titles should contain some form of branding. But our company name is Metro Manhattan Office Space. That would take up way too much space. Even "Metro Manhattan" is long. DO we need to use the title tag for branding or can we just focus on a brief description of page content incorporating one important phrase? Our site is: w w w . m e t r o - m a n h a t t a n . c o m <colgroup><col width="405"></colgroup>
 | Turnkey Flatiron Tech Space | 2,850 SF $10,687/month | <colgroup><col width="405"></colgroup>
 | Gallery, Office Rental | Midtown, W. 57 St | 4441SF $24055/month | <colgroup><col width="405"></colgroup>
 | Open Plan Loft |Flatiron, Chelsea | 2414SF $12,874/month | <colgroup><col width="405"></colgroup>
 | Tribeca Corner Loft | Varick Street | 2267SF $11,712/month | <colgroup><col width="405"></colgroup>
 | 275 Madison, LAW, P7, 3,252SF, $65 - Manhattan, New York |0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		What are best page titles for sub-folders or sub-directories? Same as website?
 Hi all, We always mention "brand & keyword" in every page title along with topic in the website, like "Topic | vertigo tiles". Let's say there is a sub-directory with hundreds of pages...what will be the best page title practice in mentioning "brand & keyword" across all pages of sub-directory to benefit in-terms if SEO? Can we add "vertigo tiles" to all pages of sub-directory? Or we must not give same phrase? Thanks, Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | vtmoz0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Splitting One Site Into Two Sites Best Practices Needed
 Okay, working with a large site that, for business reasons beyond organic search, wants to split an existing site in two. So, the old domain name stays and a new one is born with some of the content from the old site, along with some new content of its own. The general idea, for more than just search reasons, is that it makes both the old site and new sites more purely about their respective subject matter. The existing content on the old site that is becoming part of the new site will be 301'd to the new site's domain. So, the old site will have a lot of 301s and links to the new site. No links coming back from the new site to the old site anticipated at this time. Would like any and all insights into any potential pitfalls and best practices for this to come off as well as it can under the circumstances. For instance, should all those links from the old site to the new site be nofollowed, kind of like a non-editorial link to an affiliate or advertiser? Is there weirdness for Google in 301ing to a new domain from some, but not all, content of the old site. Would you individually submit requests to remove from index for the hundreds and hundreds of old site pages moving to the new site or just figure that the 301 will eventually take care of that? Is there substantial organic search risk of any kind to the old site, beyond the obvious of just not having those pages to produce any more? Anything else? Any ideas about how long the new site can expect to wander the wilderness of no organic search traffic? The old site has a 45 domain authority. Thanks! Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | 945010
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Putting Dates In Title Tag
 Hi, I have a site were I write previews for sports match ups. I notice when I don't put the date in the title I rank much better for specific keywords. I also noticed that most people don't really put in the date when they do the search anyways, especially since google does a good job of showing the most recent pages anyways. The only reason I continue to put the date is because of this whole idea of not having page titles that are duplicate. So many of our games will be Team A vs Team B Preview, and Im worried that the term "preview" will become so repetitive that google may not like it. Any tips or ideas on how to approach this issue best? Thanks! Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | tarafaraz1
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Wrong titles in site links
 Hello fellow marketers, I have found this weird thing with our website in the organic results. The sitelinks in the SERP shows wrong written text. As in grammatically incorrect text. My question is where does Google get the text from? It is not the page title as we can see it. kKsFv0X.png Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | auke18101
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Does a UTM tag influence the linkvalue?
 Will Google value a link with a UTM tag the same as a clean link without a UTM tag? I should say that a UTM tag link is not a natural link so the linkvalue is zero. Anyone any idea how to look at this? Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | TT_Vakantiehuizen0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		What is the best URL structure for categories?
 A client's site currently uses the URL structure: www.website.com/�tegory%/%postname% Which I think is optimised fairly well, as the categories are keywords being targeted. However, as they are using a category hierarchy, often times the URL looks like this: www.website.com/parent-category/child-category/some-post-titles-are-quite-long-as-they-are-long-tail-terms Best practise often dictates (such as point 3 in this Moz article) that shorter URLs are better for several reasons. So I'm left with a few options: Remove the category from the URL Flatten the category hierarchy Shorten post titles two a word or two - which would hurt my long tail search term traffic. Leave it as it is What do we think is the best route to take? Thanks in advance! Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | underscorelive0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Best practice to redirects based on visitors' detected language
 One of our websites has two languages, English and Italian. The English pages are available at the root level: Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Damiano
 www.site.com/ English homepage www.site.com/page1
 www.site.com/page2 The Italian pages are available under the /it/ level:
 www.site.com/it Italian homepage www.site.com/it/pagina1
 www.site.com/it/pagina2 When an Italian visitor first visits www.mysit.com we'd like to redirect it to www.site.com/it but we don't know if that would impact search engine spiders (eg GoogleBot) in any way... It would be better to do a Javascript redirect? Or an http 3xx redirect? If so, which of the 3xx redirect should we use? Thank you0
 
			
		 
			
		 
			
		 
			
		 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				