Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Can I set a canonical tag to an anchor link?
- 
					
					
					
					
 I have a client who is moving to a one page website design. So, content from the inner pages is being condensed in to sections on the 'home' page. There will be a navigation that anchor links to each relevant section. I am wondering if I should leave the old pages and use rel=canonical to point them to their relevant sections on the new 'home' page rather than 301 them. Thoughts? 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Hi Billy, I read through your question and it appears it's been 6 months since this post. I wondered how things were going here? Did you effectively canonicalize your old pages to your new URLs with Anchor Links? We may be in the process of doing the same thing so just wanted to ask for an update on your outcome? Thanks 
- 
					
					
					
					
 For anyone who may care - this appears to have worked out really well. So far way better than expected. Very competitive market and we are on page 1 for most of our most important phrasing.... cool. 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Yeah, trust me, I have strongly advised against it. They don't use us for design, just marketing, and the company they use for design (while, admittedly, very, very good) was almost done with this before we were brought in to the loop about the redesign. Down the road I hope to convince them to add more pages etc... but for now this is what I have to work with. I am hoping the rel=canonical will take care of the duplicate content issues while perhaps giving a bit more authority to the content sections of the one page design. This is something I have not done before, however, and I wanted to bounce it off my peers. Thank you for the response! I'll come back and post how it goes in a few months. 
- 
					
					
					
					
 I would approach this issue with the following: - I would strongly advice the client against it. This move will hamper the SEO efforts that they're paying for, and they could easily lose 30-60% of their organic traffic. Can they afford this loss?
- If they still insist on doing this, then I think I would keep the old pages as you described. But then that'll give you duplicate issues etc.
 
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
- 
		
		Moz ToolsChat with the community about the Moz tools. 
- 
		
		SEO TacticsDiscuss the SEO process with fellow marketers 
- 
		
		CommunityDiscuss industry events, jobs, and news! 
- 
		
		Digital MarketingChat about tactics outside of SEO 
- 
		
		Research & TrendsDive into research and trends in the search industry. 
- 
		
		SupportConnect on product support and feature requests. 
Related Questions
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Can I safely delete unused tags??
 Can I safely delete unused tags, ones with 0 posts connected to them? Thanks, Mike Technical SEO | | naturalsociety0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Trailing slash URLs and canonical links
 Hi, I've seen a fair amount of topics speaking about the difference between domain names ending with or without trailing slashes, the impact on crawlers and how it behaves with canonical links. Technical SEO | | GhillC
 However, it sticks to domain names only.
 What about subfolders and pages then? How does it behaves with those? Say I've a site structured like this:
 https://www.domain.com
 https://www.domain.com/page1 And for each of my pages, I've an automatic canonical link ending with a slash.
 Eg. rel="canonical" href="https://www.domain.com/page1/" /> for the above page. SEM Rush flags this as a canonical error. But is it exactly?
 Are all my canonical links wrong because of that slash? And as subsidiary question, both domain.com/page1 and domain.com/page1/ are accessible. Is it this a mistake or it doesn't make any difference (I've read that those are considered different pages)? Thanks!
 G0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Quick Fix to "Duplicate page without canonical tag"?
 When we pull up Google Search Console, in the Index Coverage section, under the category of Excluded, there is a sub-category called ‘Duplicate page without canonical tag’. The majority of the 665 pages in that section are from a test environment. If we were to include in the robots.txt file, a wildcard to cover every URL that started with the particular root URL ("www.domain.com/host/"), could we eliminate the majority of these errors? That solution is not one of the 5 or 6 recommended solutions that the Google Search Console Help section text suggests. It seems like a simple effective solution. Are we missing something? Technical SEO | | CREW-MARKETING1
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Can I have an H1 tag below an H2?
 Quick question for you all - Is there an issue with me having an H1 tag physically below an H2 tag on a web page?? Technical SEO | | Pete40
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Find all links in the site and anchor text
 Hi, Find all links in the site and anchor text and i need this done on my own website so i know if we dont have links that are anchored to numbers and punctuations that are not seen at all. Thanks Technical SEO | | mtthompsons0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Do canonical tags pass all of the link juice onto the URL they point to?
 I have an ecommerce website where the category pages have various sorting and paging options which add a suffix to the URLs. My site is setup so the root category URL, domain.com/category-name, has a canonical tag pointing to domain.com/category-name/page1/price however all links, both interner & external, point to the former (i.e. domain.com/category-name). I would like to know whether all of the link juice is being passed onto the canonical tag URL? Otherwise should I change the canonical tag to point the other way? Thanks! Technical SEO | | tjhossy0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		I need help with a PHP canonical URL tags
 I found a little difficult for me to do a canonical tag in my PHP. On-Page Report Card We check to make sure that IF you use canonical URL tags, it points to the right page. If the canonical tag points to a different URL, engines will not count this page as the reference resource and thus, it won't have an opportunity to rank. If you've not made this page the rel=canonical target, change the reference to this URL. NOTE: For pages not employing canonical URL tags, this factor does not apply. I don't know how to tidy my PHP Any suggestion. Technical SEO | | lnietob0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		How to set up a rel canonical in big commmerce?
 I have no clue how to set this up in the Bigcommerce store platform Technical SEO | | Firestarter-SEO0
 
			
		 
			
		 
			
		 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				