Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Do Canonical Tags Pass Link Juice?
- 
					
					
					
					
 I have an ecommerce website where some pages link to a product page with a different URL. EXAMPLE: 1: /category/product1.html (not indexed by Google) with canonical pointing to product1.html Other page link to the product like below. 2: product1.html (indexed by Google) Now the question is, does 1: pass any link juice to product1.html or not? Is it worth to change everything and link only to one URL? My site is running on Magento! 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Canonicals can pass link juice (see Dr. Pete's comment here), but it's at Google's discretion. I've seen it go both ways. The best way is to only link the one version you've chosen as the canonical. I'm not familiar with Magento - is that something that you can change easily? I think it'd be worth the time you'd invest in making that change. 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Hello Bill369, I do not know about link juice, whether is passed or not. For that you should use a 301 redirection. 
 As for ranking, it DOES pass PR (Page Rank, something used internally in google search engine algorithms).Remember always to point canonicals to pages that have the same user intent, not just canonicalize some pages in order to gain that page "link strength". 
 Here some other Q&A:Does Canonical Tag passes link juice to the original URL? - Moz Q&A 
 Does rel= canonical combine link juice for 2 pages? - Moz Q&A
 Does "Canonical" tag pass link juice? Which URL should we prefer for link building? - Google Webmaster forumHope it helps. 
 Best luck.
 GR.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
- 
		
		Moz ToolsChat with the community about the Moz tools. 
- 
		
		SEO TacticsDiscuss the SEO process with fellow marketers 
- 
		
		CommunityDiscuss industry events, jobs, and news! 
- 
		
		Digital MarketingChat about tactics outside of SEO 
- 
		
		Research & TrendsDive into research and trends in the search industry. 
- 
		
		SupportConnect on product support and feature requests. 
Related Questions
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Should we Nofollow Social Links?
 I've been asked the question of whether if we should nofollow all of our social links, would this be a wise thing to do? I'm not exactly getting a clear answer from search results and thought you guys would be best to ask 🙂 Thanks in advance. Technical SEO | | JH_OffLimits0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Trailing slash URLs and canonical links
 Hi, I've seen a fair amount of topics speaking about the difference between domain names ending with or without trailing slashes, the impact on crawlers and how it behaves with canonical links. Technical SEO | | GhillC
 However, it sticks to domain names only.
 What about subfolders and pages then? How does it behaves with those? Say I've a site structured like this:
 https://www.domain.com
 https://www.domain.com/page1 And for each of my pages, I've an automatic canonical link ending with a slash.
 Eg. rel="canonical" href="https://www.domain.com/page1/" /> for the above page. SEM Rush flags this as a canonical error. But is it exactly?
 Are all my canonical links wrong because of that slash? And as subsidiary question, both domain.com/page1 and domain.com/page1/ are accessible. Is it this a mistake or it doesn't make any difference (I've read that those are considered different pages)? Thanks!
 G0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Link rel="prev" AND canonical
 Hi guys, When you have several tabs on your website with products, you can most likely navigate to page 2, 3, 4 etc... Technical SEO | | AdenaSEO
 You can add the link rel="prev" and link rel="next" tags to make sure that 1 page get's indexed / ranked by Google. am I correct? However this still means that all the pages can get indexed, right? For example a webshop makes use of the link rel="prev" and ="next" tags. In the Google results page though, all the seperate tabs pages are still visible/indexed..
 http://www.domain.nl/watches/?tab=1
 http://www.domain.nl/watches/?tab=24
 http://www.domain.nl/watches/?tab=19
 etc..... Can we prevent this, and make sure only the main page get's indexed and ranked, by adding a canonical link on every 'tab page' to the main page --> www.domain.nl/watches/ I hope I explained it well and I'm looking forward to hearing from you. Regards, Tom1
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Canonical Tag when using Ajax and PhantomJS
 Hello, We have a site that is built using an AJAX application. We include the meta fragment tag in order to get a rendered page from PhantomJS. The URL that is rendered to google from PhantomJS then is www.oursite.com/?escaped_fragment= In the SERP google of course doesnt include the hashtag in the URL. So my question, with this setup, do i still need a canonical tag and if i do, would the canonical tag be the escaped fragment URL or the regular URL? Much Appreciated! Technical SEO | | RevanaDigitalSEO0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		301 redirect: canonical or non canonical?
 Hi, Newbie alert! I need to set up 301 redirects for changed URLs on a database driven site that is to be redeveloped shortly. The current site uses canonical header tags. The new site will also use canonical tags. Should the 301 redirects map the canonical URL on the old site to the corresponding canonical for the new design . . . or should they map the non canonical database URLs old and new? Given that the purpose of canonicals is to indicate our preferred URL, then my guess is that's what I should use. However, how can I be sure that Google (for example) has indexed the canonical in every case? Thx in anticipation. Technical SEO | | ztalk1120
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Canonical tag for Home page: with or without / at the end???
 Setting up canonical tags for an old site. I really need advice on that darn backslash / at the end of the homepage URL. We have incoming links to the homepage as http://www.mysite.com (without the backslash), and as http://www.mysite.com/ (with the backslash), and as http://www.mysite.com/index.html I know that there should be 301 redirects to just one version, but I need to know more about the canonical tags... Which should the canonical tag be??? (without the backslash) or (with the backslash) Thanks for your help! 🙂 Technical SEO | | GregB1230
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Header Tags
 Ok so I am writing different pages and the first heading is an H3 just because I wanted to it be a certain size. Then as you see the content, I have an H1 tag. Example page: http://www.oxfordmshomes.net/condos/acadia-court-Oxford-MS you can see that "Acadia First" is the first thing you see on the page and it uses an H3 element. Long story short, my hierarchy is wrong. Does this have any negative effect on my SEO efforts? Technical SEO | | blake-766240
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Robots.txt and canonical tag
 In the SEOmoz post - http://www.seomoz.org/blog/robot-access-indexation-restriction-techniques-avoiding-conflicts, it's being said - If you have a robots.txt disallow in place for a page, the canonical tag will never be seen. Does it so happen that if a page is disallowed by robots.txt, spiders DO NOT read the html code ? Technical SEO | | seoug_20050
 
			
		 
			
		 
			
		 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				