Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Web Core Vitals and Page Speed Insights Not Matching Scores
- 
					
					
					
					
 We have some URLs that are being flagged as poor inside Search Console in the Web Core Vitals report. For example, the report is saying that some pages have too many CLS issues. When looking into things we can do to update we have noticed that when we run the same page using the PageSpeed Insights tool we are not getting the same bad scores. This is making it hard for us to actually know what needs to be addressed. Nor can we tell if a change actually fixed the issue because in PageSpeed Insights there is not an issue. Has anyone else had similar issues. If so have you found a way to fix it? 
- 
					
					
					
					
 To my understanding, GSC is reporting based on "field data" (meaning the aggregate score of visitors to a specific page over a 28 day period). When you run Page Speed Insights, you can see both Field Data and "lab data". The lab data is your specific run. There are quite a few reasons why field data and lab data may not match. One reason is that changes have been made to the page, which are reflected in the lab data, but will not be reflected in the field data until the next month's set is available. Another reason is that the lab device doesn't run at the exact same specs as the real users in the field data. The way I look at it is that I use the lab data (and I screen print my results over time, or use other Lighthouse-based tools like GTMetrix, with an account) to assess incremental changes. But the goal is to eventually get the field data (representative of the actual visitors) improved, especially since that's what appears to be what will be used in the ranking signals, as best I can tell. 
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
- 
		
		Moz ToolsChat with the community about the Moz tools. 
- 
		
		SEO TacticsDiscuss the SEO process with fellow marketers 
- 
		
		CommunityDiscuss industry events, jobs, and news! 
- 
		
		Digital MarketingChat about tactics outside of SEO 
- 
		
		Research & TrendsDive into research and trends in the search industry. 
- 
		
		SupportConnect on product support and feature requests. 
Related Questions
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		What is the best meta description for Category Pages, Tag Pages and Main Article?
 Hi, I want to index all my categories and tags. But I fear about duplicating the meta description. for example: I have a tag name "Learn Stock Market", a category name "Learning", and a main article "What is Stock Market". What is your suggestion for meta description of these three pages that looks great for seo google? On-Page Optimization | | mbmozmb0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		FAQ page structure
 I have read in other discussions that having all questions on an FAQ page is the way to go and then if the question has an answer worthy of its own page, you should abbreviate the answer and link to the page with more content. My question is when using some templates in WP, they have a little + button you can click and it reveal the answer to the question. Does this hurt SEO versus having all text visible and then using headers/subheaders? An example of the + button https://fyrfyret.dk/faq/ On-Page Optimization | | OrlandSEO1
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Should I optimize my home-page or a sub-page for my most important keyword
 Quick question: When choosing the most important keyword set that I would like to rank for, would I be better off optimizing my homepage, or a sub page for this keyword. My thinking goes as follows: The homepage (IE www.mysite.com) naturally has more backlinks and thus a better Google Page Rank. However, there are certain things I could do to a subpage (IE www.mysite.com/green-widgets-los-angeles ) that I wouldn't want to do to the homepage, which might be more "optimal" overall. Option C, I suppose, would be to optimize both the homepage, and a single sub-page, which is seeming like a pretty good solution, but I have been told that having multiple pages optimized for the same keywords might "confuse" search engines. Would love any insight on this! On-Page Optimization | | Jacob_A2
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Punctuation at the Start of Page Titles
 one of my clients appears to be using an exclamation mark (e.g. "! Graphic Prints By Mirrorin - Fun Childrens Graphic Prints") and to be completely honest, I have no idea if this is bad practice or if it wont have any affect from an SEO point of view? Any help would be appreciated because it is site wide, therefore if it is an issue I would like to be able to get it sorted asap! Thanks On-Page Optimization | | ZaddleMarketing0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Footer link to home page?
 Quick question - is it a best practice to add a footer link on each page of a website that points back to your home page, with the anchor text being your official brand name? On-Page Optimization | | Bandicoot0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Is there a SEO penalty for multi links on same page going to same destination page?
 Hi, Just a quick note. I hope you are able to assist. To cut a long story short, on the page below http://www.bookbluemountains.com.au/ -> Features Specials & Packages (middle column) we have 3 links per special going to the same page. On-Page Optimization | | daveupton
 1. Header is linked
 2. Click on image link - currently with a no follow
 3. 'More info' under the description paragraph is linked too - currently with a no follow Two arguments are as follows:
 1. The reason we do not follow all 3 links is to reduce too many links which may appear spammy to Google. 2. Counter argument:
 The point above has some validity, However, using no follow is basically telling the search engines that the webmaster “does not trust or doesn’t take responsibility” for what is behind the link, something you don’t want to do within your own website. There is no penalty as such for having too many links, the search engines will generally not worry after a certain number.. nothing that would concern this business though. I would suggest changing the no follow links a.s.a.p. Could you please advise thoughts. Many thanks Dave Upton [long signature removed by staff]0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Creating New Pages Versus Improving Existing Pages
 What are some things to consider or things to evaluate when deciding whether you should focus resources on creating new pages (to cover more related topics) versus improving existing pages (adding more useful information, etc.)? On-Page Optimization | | SparkplugDigital0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Would it be bad to change the canonical URL to the most recent page that has duplicate content, or should we just 301 redirect to the new page?
 Is it bad to change the canonical URL in the tag, meaning does it lose it's stats? If we add a new page that may have duplicate content, but we want that page to be indexed over the older pages, should we just change the canonical page or redirect from the original canonical page? Thanks so much! -Amy On-Page Optimization | | MeghanPrudencio0
 
			
		 
			
		 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				